Can I use one Winsock control for both Client and Server whichever it turns out to be?
I want two apps both able to connect to each other and listen for a connection from the other side
Anything I post is an example only and is not intended to be the only solution, the total solution nor the final solution to your request nor do I claim that it is. If you find it useful then it is entirely up to you to make whatever changes necessary you feel are adequate for your purposes.
When I click on your link I get following message:
File 'Unicode1on1 Chat.zip' appears malicious
Anything I post is an example only and is not intended to be the only solution, the total solution nor the final solution to your request nor do I claim that it is. If you find it useful then it is entirely up to you to make whatever changes necessary you feel are adequate for your purposes.
Use winsock for the client, and winsock with an Index of 0 for the listening server. Make the server load a new winsock for each connection. That's how you accept multiple connections.
And it says it's malicious because it's a vb extension. I have Chrome and it does that to me every time.
Use winsock for the client, and winsock with an Index of 0 for the listening server. Make the server load a new winsock for each connection. That's how you accept multiple connections.
I already know that but that wasn't my question. It's not for multiple connections; it's only for two-way communication where either side can be either the client or the server depending on who connects to who. I was just wondering if that can be done using only one Winsock per side instead of two Winsocks per side.
Anything I post is an example only and is not intended to be the only solution, the total solution nor the final solution to your request nor do I claim that it is. If you find it useful then it is entirely up to you to make whatever changes necessary you feel are adequate for your purposes.
Anything I post is an example only and is not intended to be the only solution, the total solution nor the final solution to your request nor do I claim that it is. If you find it useful then it is entirely up to you to make whatever changes necessary you feel are adequate for your purposes.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Conroy Vanderbluff
