Ah, i've waited for this so long now!
Quote:
If God DOES exist and he isn't some amorphous blob that has a thousand heads, one for each "culture" then it means ALL but ONE are automatically incorrect.
I'm so so glad that you finally showed what the problem with your view is :) YOU ACTUALLY STATE ONE RELIGION MUST BE CORRECT, THAT THERE IS A TRUE RELIGION (IF GOD EXIST)
THEN YOU DRAW THE CONCLUSION GOD IS UNLIKELY JUST BECAUSE NONE OF THE MOST COMMON RELIGIONS ARE CABABLE OF BEING FLAWLESS.
What a mess these hundreds of threads have been just because of that! Why can't you consider what you think cannot effect the outcome of what has already happened, that a true religion actually must exist to cause the fact of there being a god. NONSENSE! BULLCRAP!
Gen-X interesting points you raise
In the Catholic church you must be baptised to have any chance of gaining heaven. Now clearly if you are a Muslim (example only) you are not likely to be baptised into the Catholic church. This would seem to be an exceedingly stupid world viewpoint, and is held up by any number of religons/churches.
Does God exist;
If he/she/it does then he/she/it would probably be highly critical of organised religons, who have started any number of genocides/wars etc etc over minor differences of opinion.
contridictions in the bible..
did you miss those posts about contridictions?
if so
go back
you will find quite few of them
and i am about to post set 4..
Quote:
1.) Which one will show you a GOD of love? Well, you can take away 10% of religion.
2.) Which one will show you everlastiing life? That's another 16% broken off...
go on...
i like to see 100% made up based on your way of thinking
i wonder if my religion is going to miss any of it :)
Damn got to agree with a pommie here
The mistake most of you are making is equating Gen-Xs attacks on religon as direct attacks on the existence of God.
Organised religon, (of any creed) is an attempt to codify the existence of God in such a form as it will support the hierarchy of that religon. The spread of christianity in Britian was an attempt to stamp out the local "religons" as rallying points. Also witness it's use, (and especially the promotion of anti-Witch craft etc), to down play women's roles in society. The same l might add could be applied to the Muslem faith, especially those caring and sharing folk in Afghanistan.
The requirement to believe in a set religon in order to believe in god is misleading and deceptive. As Queen Elizabeth stated, "I do not wish to open windows into man's souls".
Therefore can we be a bit more selective here, and decide waht we are debating, organised religon or the existence of god.
Interesting that kovan got a whole thread going just to attack Gen-X, a bit put out were we with some of his comments.
Thank you Gen-X for replying
Yep, this is really important, at least for me, we have been like "doing nothing" for ages and for the first time i think I get somewhere, and I think if you read what i'm going to post, you could learn something. I'm sorry if had to get that offensive but you know, we know each other, and I just had to get a reply from you.
Commenting belief structure
Quote:
What a person believes in provides an insight into their character. If I said "My belief structure is that God is an Apple" you would be able to assertain something about me as a person right?
Quote:
I am hoping that these people will understand that perhaps their beliefs are not 100% and are in fact 99%. The whole reason I do this is because it is my opinion that those people who have absolute faith (read that 100%) are ultimately BLIND... and if I can provide someone with at least 1% doubt then they no longer limit themselves and can look with TRUE eyes and not those of someone who has been trained NOT to look.
Apple... Yeah I know what you mean, You like to hear the details and correct them. You've been doing that for ages now. You know as well, I don't have those details and you should be proud if that was your goal. But that's not totally correct. You're instead a bit upset with me, trying to ignore me. And the only statement i'm usually making about God is that I believe he exist, and that I don't have any faith in any detailed views of him. This seems to make you nervous. I hope you can get over this because tumblingdown, had a good point, and that is to religion will disappear (your work eliminating the details will be a success) And only two types of people will remain, those who don't believe in that God exists, and those who believe there is. Without any details, and definition of God, as you know, the creator of universe. However I hope you take me seriously, I'm going to ask you directly, What do you really have against me? What is so uncomfortable to have me around?
BTW, I forgot to take that Orange Juice, thanks Arbiter