Printable View
when i found out that in order for someone to launch vb.net they had to have .net framework; i was PI$$ED!
because i spent $60 on somthing that the user has to have .net framework??? argh... i am not going to do that, like 40%-50% of the people i know dont even have framework. i liked vb6 because somthing like 98% of the users, have the files needed to run vb6 exe's.
MY SOLUTION: learn Visual C++ .NET
Errm... "MY SOLUTION: learn Visual C++ .NET", are you trying to be funny? :\
Anything with .Net on the end needs the .Net framework. And VB6 isn't always supported out of the box, 95 definitely doesn't support it... I dunno about 98.
Learn assembly if your worried about dependencies. :)
Or stick to vb6 :afrog:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALL
Dont care. No ones fault you didnt know the product you were purchasing before you bought it except your own.
^ rude
:eek:
Well its true. Consumer education people.
Considering it was Cander making that post, it was actually quite Polite!Quote:
Originally Posted by demotivater
You got Visual studio for $60!?
That makes me mad! I spent a couple of thousand dollars for an MSDN lic.
:mad: :mad:
$60 that about £30 and thats not fair :cry:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pc_Madness
You don't have to use the managed part of VC++ .NET 03 even if you are using VC++ .NET 03. I don't...;)
well, i read in two places online that VC++ .net does not require .net framwork!
they may be wrong, but that is why i said that :wave:
If you code in C#, the MS' .net version of C++ you need the .net framework, but if you use VS to make a plain C++ program you shouldn't (i think).
Acutally that's not true, you don't have to use the .net framework in C++.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pc_Madness
It's an option just like MFC or STL. You don't have to use it but it's there if you want to. I'm sure microsoft did this because most C programmers woudln't be too thrilled to have a lot of bloatware with their programs.
On another note... C++ actually creates faster .net code in the 2005 edition of visual studio or so I've heard. The resaon is due to the long life span of C++ and all the optmizations that have went into it over the years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maven
Hehehehe...first I said that you don't have to use the framework if you are coding in VC++ .NET then ALL, then SLH, and then Maven, whos next...:D
didi someone mention already that you don't have to use the framework if you are coding in VC++.
Ok OK it was lame but you were asking for it Note!
:wave:
HEhehee....I actualy didn't think anyone would even try to post a post like that one now..:D:D:D
hey, it could have been worse!, mendhak could have came in here, and started making sarcastic remarks (no offence mendhak) :wave:
None taken.
:rolleyes:
I haven't programmed in vb.net in long time, so correct me if I'm wrong...Isn't there a lisence that you can get from microsoft that allows you to package the .net framework into your deployable app?
I don't believe you need a license to include the framework. If I'm wrong, it's news to me. :wave:
Did you mean this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...distdeploy.asp
You dont need a license to use the .net framework :afrog:
Whenever I programmed in vb.net, it never let me include the .net framework needed for the application in the installation.
Blah. You should be using Cω instead ;)
My 3 latest posts are on Cω:
http://www.irishdev.com/blogs/plenderj
What is c weird character? Is that somesort of IDE?
You should really learn your Greek letters :)
That's the greek small letter omega. Cω is a research programming language by Microsoft.
Basically it provides further developments beyond C#, but it has some seriously cool features.
As far as I know its features should be in C# 3.0 :thumb:
Take a look at the 3 posts on my blog and you'll see why I think its cool :)
All I know is it's an sideways 3Quote:
Originally Posted by plenderj
;)
I do like the looks of the syntax of that langauge, looks similar to java! I might have to take a look at learning it.
Its the C# similarity that you're seeing. Cω extends on C# by providing some extra language enhancements, and a more strongly typed approach to SQL...
... its quite cool if you ask me :D
You have to distribute applications on CD these days there is no alternative, simply because of the volume of data being shipped out. So what is the difference if you also put the framework runtimes on the disc too?
No fv(king difference, thats what. Its a one-time thing anyway, it takes all of 60 seconds to install the framework. Plus, all new MS OS's are being shipped with the latest frameworks BUILT IN! So what is the problem?
Stop crying. Start developing. :thumb:
{edited from a much less polite version by wossname}
Christ... I hate to think what your original looked like :lol:
It probably would have resulted in "Banning with extreme predjudice". Me, my family, and all my friends would have been barred permanently.Quote:
Originally Posted by plenderj
Chased with pitchforks if you will?
That's a privilege reserved for NotLKHs posts.
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by plenderj
*gothic*
After millions of years of of evolution, this is what you are doing with your opposable thumbs.
Had the organic compounds meandering around the primordial soup known that it would come to this, I don't think they'd have bothered.
Had the organic compounds meandering around the primordial soup been developed enough to posess cognitive abilities we wouldn't be having this discussion right now ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Merrion
within a year, we should start to see some commercial apps built off the framework... (like ATI's control panel for their graphics card) this will make .net application deployment easier.... all you need to do is state that the .net framework is needed, and tell people to visit windowsupdate.microsoft.com to get it.. if your app is going out on CD, then unless its huge, you shouldn't have a problem squeezing the framework on the CD with the app...
Well I've been producing ASP.NET applications for quite a while now. Commercial apps for companies...
"forcing" users to download the .NET framework is no lessannoying than
"forcing" them to download the JAVA runtimes :rolleyes:
Cω (pronounced "cow")
Almost everyone has java runtimes..
A broad spectrum antibiotic will clear that up pretty quickly.Quote:
Almost everyone has java runtimes..
Did it take you the whole 48 hours to come up with that response? :bigyello:Quote:
Originally Posted by Merrion
LMAO:lol::lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by szlamany
My ATI control panel wont boot even though I have the runtimes and framework :cry:
Its no different from when you had to install VB6 runtimes but it is alot bigger I must admit :)
No - I was in rural Sligo over the weekend. They don't really have electricity there, let alone the internet.Quote:
Did it take you the whole 48 hours to come up with that response?