http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...erreurs_en.htm
An interesting read :rolleyes:
Printable View
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...erreurs_en.htm
An interesting read :rolleyes:
thats wierd
I was able to explain some of them, like the wings probably snapped off and the plane's debris got chucked into the Pentagon, but some of it was weird
Oooo - conspiracy theories... it does look like a pretty small hole for a plane, esp. compared to the other two, which toreethrough steel, not what looks like concrete... :eek:
Geeez........where's Scully and Mulder when you need them;)
Very wierd like something out of the X- files.Quote:
Originally posted by Skitchen8
thats wierd
Arent conspiracy theories supposed to suggest that something crazier and wilder happened than the govt said... sounds like this guy has it arse over tit... now if it was really an alian spacecraft and the govt said it was a 757 that would be a conspiracy theory...
besides i dont see the drama at all.. first reports were that it crashed into the ground just in front of the pentagon and the pic with the wings looks like there is plenty of damage to the building where the wings would have been before they got snapped off... "I bring you love"
I was gonna overlook that - but 12 minutes? You're doing it on purpose aren't you?Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
Very wierd like something out of the X- files.
:p
But what if BB, What If ??Quote:
Originally posted by beachbum
Arent conspiracy theories supposed to suggest that something crazier and wilder happened than the govt said... sounds like this guy has it arse over tit... now if it was really an alian spacecraft and the govt said it was a 757 that would be a conspiracy theory...
besides i dont see the drama at all.. first reports were that it crashed into the ground just in front of the pentagon and the pic with the wings looks like there is plenty of damage to the building where the wings would have been before they got snapped off... "I bring you love"
Yeah just to get on your nerves. :pQuote:
Originally posted by rjlohan
I was gonna overlook that - but 12 minutes? You're doing it on purpose aren't you?
:p
how would wings get snapped off?...if this plane bellyflopped onto the ground, the engines would have torn off but not the wings, they are higher than the lowest point of the fuselage and the engines ripping off wouldn't have snapped them either since they break off at the strut.Quote:
Originally posted by beachbum
besides i dont see the drama at all.. first reports were that it crashed into the ground just in front of the pentagon and the pic with the wings looks like there is plenty of damage to the building where the wings would have been before they got snapped off...
Wings are pretty hardcore too, they tend to "slice" rather than snap, evident in the footage of them going into the WTC...wings just kept on going in with the rest of the aircraft.
this is crap...even the flucking lockerbie 747 left a huge section of the front after a) being exploded b) falling 37000 feetQuote:
"First of all, the question about the aircraft, there are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior during this fire-fighting operation I'm talking about, but not large sections. In other words, there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing."
http://www.cnn.com/LAW/trials.and.ca....lockerbie.jpg
So if that can survive that, you can't seriously believe this 757 would disintegrate and leave nothing.A puddle?? A puddle!? Okay, this thing hadn't been in the air long, and it left a puddle of aviation fuel........hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm sure thing. Flucking flood more likeQuote:
When asked by a journalist: "Where is the jet fuel?"
"We have what we believe is a puddle right there that the
This dude makes a convincing case methinks
You should never let logic and clear thinking get in the way of fanaticism. That's all I've got to say on the matter.
;)
The Pentagon ain't exactly your average split-level family suburban home. It may be the most solid structure next to the pryamids. The section that was hit was being reinforced even further. Many people (including people from my company) weren't in that section because of the renovation. Ayway, it is made of tuff stuff.
When I saw the pictures on Septmber 11, I, too, thought they looked odd because there was just a small hole compared to WTC. What heappened to the wings? I don't know. Pictues from the Pentagon weren't as readily available as those from WTC. And Pentagon is a very different kind of building.
If there is a conspiracy, what is it? Why would anyone say it was a plane that crashed and not something else? What would be the motive?
It's just that Pentagon has limited people around it is an unusual building.
A commercial airliner disappeared from the sky according to radar record and then 'something' crashed into the Pentagon, which those spin doctors claim was that airplane. Actually, the plane was eaten by my green space wander friends that dress in black English suits and I plugged that hole in the Pentagon with a nuclear Farmer's blow snot shot that the aliens showed me. So you got me. Wasn't the missing airplane like all the other missing airplanes that crashed into buildings that day, was my own alien engineered nuclear snot shot that I ripped out just to cause confusion so that someone would post about it on the web and I could have something to comment about because I am so lonely (at least when the aliens aren't here probing).
well if an airplane didn't hit the pentagon, then where the **** did that other 747 go? its not like by coincidence an entire 747 is abducted by aliens at the same time as the pentagon says it was barrelling towards them.
maybe it never existed and in a "happy" coincidence for the pengaton they used the events of the day to cover their arses.
Check this
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/wor...00/1861977.stm
Not only incorrect date and time but that so called plane could frankly be anything, like painted on afterwards for example
What plane? I can't see a damn thing... :p
uhh if they were smart enough to put a plane hitting the building in, why didn't they change the date? and where the **** did the people on that plane dissapear to? its not like the pentagon had prior knowledge to this, picked a plane got the passengers off, poped the all of them in the back of the head, then did something with the plane they were supposed to get on
My first guess as to a reason for conspiracy of this nature would be that someone inside the building detonated an explosive, and hence they of course don't want the public to be aware of how useless their security dept is, so they blamed it on unpredictable events on the day... :p
i'm guessing it's that small white long thing to the top right of the right yellow barrier stand since it isn't there in the second pic but even allowing for distance it's tiny, more like a cesna than a frucking 757Quote:
Originally posted by rjlohan
What plane? I can't see a damn thing... :p
More like a spitball!
:p
Emm Chris u've finally lost it :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by chrisjk
how would wings get snapped off?...if this plane bellyflopped onto the ground, the engines would have torn off but not the wings, they are higher than the lowest point of the fuselage and the engines ripping off wouldn't have snapped them either since they break off at the strut.
Wings are pretty hardcore too, they tend to "slice" rather than snap, evident in the footage of them going into the WTC...wings just kept on going in with the rest of the aircraft.
Ok I never said that the wings snapped off when hitting the ground. But look at the pic of the damage... hell what do u think caused the indendations that coincidently are where the wings wouldve hit. Here, i've used sooper advanced techniques to advance the plane forward and wacky doooo there are indentations at the right spots...
http://www.vbforums.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=883663
This is by no means a rule of air crashes. Having read a number of air safety books I wouldnt have any problem with planes disappearing into zillions of little bits.Quote:
this is crap...even the flucking lockerbie 747 left a huge section of the front after a) being exploded b) falling 37000 feetSo if that can survive that, you can't seriously believe this 757 would disintegrate and leave nothing.
Emm have u ever seen 'safety' tests done on airplanes with and without air fuel. The fuel can explode and burn in seconds.Quote:
A puddle?? A puddle!? Okay, this thing hadn't been in the air long, and it left a puddle of aviation fuel........hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm sure thing. Flucking flood more like
So does Santa Claus :DQuote:
This dude makes a convincing case methinks
Will pass this onto the pilots in the family, and will try and keep[ the tech talk down. But would depend on speed of impact l think..
Psst Aliens were being interrogated in the Pentagon, and all l'm saying is they shouldn't have served baked beans for dinner...
Emm jethro.. ur Snoopy security blanket does not count as a pilot :)
Quote:
Originally posted by beachbum
Emm jethro.. ur Snoopy security blanket does not count as a pilot :)
LOL:D Two commerical pilots in the family. Top blokes, like a beer and the rugby. It's dangerous getting them on this stuff, but what the hey, they'll be able to fully explain it....*groan* DF give me the edited highlights....
ROFLMAO:D...just knew BB had to be involved somewhere....Quote:
Then, he gives no orders. Why? He continues to listen to a student talk about her pet goat. Why?
Compare and contrast the with the picture below . . . which is the result of an ground/aircraft coming-together. Bear in mind that the aircraft was already partially disintigrated . . .
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5260/crater2.jpg
Admittedly the aircraft in question was a) larger (a 747) and b) more fuelled, it was crossing the Atlantic . . .
Quote:
Originally posted by gravyboy
Compare and contrast the with the picture below . . . which is the result of an ground/aircraft coming-together. Bear in mind that the aircraft was already partially disintigrated . . .
http://www.vbforums.com/
Admittedly the aircraft in question was a) larger (a 747) and b) more fuelled, it was crossing the Atlantic . . .
Nope have examine the picture and the Atlantic is no where in view....
Okay Mr Smarty-fookin-pants . . . . . and b) the route taken involved an Atlantic crossing . . .
:rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally posted by gravyboy
Okay Mr Smarty-fookin-pants . . . . . and b) the route taken involved an Atlantic crossing . . .
:rolleyes:
Is the big X where the plane is?
:confused:
Sorry have identified the photo....the remains of a small Norwegian village after Peet and his mates did a pub crawl through it....if you look closely you can even make out their progress....Quote:
Originally posted by gravyboy
Okay Mr Smarty-fookin-pants . . . . . and b) the route taken involved an Atlantic crossing . . .
:rolleyes:
Next we'll be asked to find Waldo :rolleyes:
Until I see a complete coverage (with pictures of plane debris), I remain skeptical about the whereabouts of the flight.
I'm not an aviation specialist but it seems to me that there is at least something suspicious about the whole thing.
I'm not denying the whole disaster but the explanations offered have severe holes in them.
Waldo is currently enjoying a refreshing Ale with Peet and his mates in a small Norwegian village....
Oh goody - I got a picture now...
Hey - isn't that Newcastle - that's the mines isn't it?
:confused:
So those books are purely commercial ? :confused:
Quote:
Originally posted by Wally Pipp
So those books are purely commercial ? :confused:
Damn quick recovery needed here....er....no factual evidence of this Waldo guy who keeps losing himself in the crowd. Bauhaus influence or something....phew might have saved that one...
Waldo's comment on the matter : "Who the hell are all those folks ?? Can't they just leave me alone :mad:"
He consequently disappeared in the crowd.
Police chief has been reported saying "Where's Waldo now ?"
Witnesses have heard a loud scream ("Aaaaaaaaargh ! Not again ! Leave me alone, you lot !") but then things went quiet again.
No-one has yet ascertained the whereabouts of Mr. Waldo.
The search continues ...
Wally - thought you might approve of Waldo's British name change....Quote:
Originally posted by Wally Pipp
Next we'll be asked to find Waldo :rolleyes:
http://www.vbforums.com/images/ieimages/2002/03/21.jpg
[paranoid voice]
THEY'RE OUT TO GET ME !!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHH
[/paranoid voice]
Actually, the dutch title has been "Waar is Wally nu weer ?" ("Where's Wally now ?") for years.
Where did you think I got my screen name from ? :p
I just assumed it was your real name, but that "DWillems" meant something really obscene in Belgian...
:p
D is my first name (betting starts now !) and Willems is short for Willemsens (don't ask me why I shortened it :) ) which means Son of Willem.
I thought a wally was NZ speak for a loser :confused: :p
why would the pentagon have any reason to blame the events of the day on a plane. The chances of ANOTHER radical middle east guy blowing up the pentagon within hours of Osamas 15 mins of fame is nil. The pentagon must have got pretty lucky
:eek:
Never thought I'd need to pepper my posts with smilies for you, Wally. I had actually worked out which way around it was. :rolleyes:
"Wally" means idiot in the UK; don't know about the Kiwi version.
p.s. Dolores?
:p:p
That's why I provided smilies. To let you know that I was in on the joke ;)
ps : oooooooooh, so close ... :p
:o I'm often worryingly stupid. It's a wonder I remember to breathe.Quote:
Originally posted by Wally Pipp
That's why I provided smilies. To let you know that I was in on the joke ;)
Doris?
It's actually Davina but I'll give you the points.
I knew a Davina once, BOY! was she...... ummmmmm,,,,,,
errrr,,,,...well. Oh ****
NZ version would be drop kick, the smut detector wont allow me to post the Oz version.....but it ends with head.....
Wally l was going to go with Dilburt...damn