Boycotte Jesus4u

He needs to go - plain and simple.....

Ked et al,

It is one thing to discuss religion, it is another to attempt to influence weak minded and impressionable people and attempt to recruit them into whatever faction he is a part of.....

I believe that if J4U gets one person interested then he will latch onto that person and brainwash them.....

I have seen the way these people operate, it is devious and dangerous, and his mass preaching is the first stage in finding a victim - trust me, i've seen it first hand.

The destruction and pain that these people can cause is large and very real.

All it takes is one curious impressionable person and he'll be as happy as larry....

If you dispute my thoughts then please PM me and i'll give you the whole sordid story of what happened to my family if it'll help convince you....but I GUARANTEE you that this is what he is trying to do...

"So you say you want to know why the world goes around,
and you can't find the truth in the things you've found -
and you're scared ****less cause evil abounds - come join us"
Bad Religion - Come join us...

Quote:

---

Originally posted by crispin
....but I GUARANTEE you that this is what he is trying to do...

---

Notwithstanding what might have happened to your family, you can't possibly have any evidence to make this assertion.

The important word here is discussion. If j4u was keen to discuss the results of his plagarism, then I see no problem.

But random postings of biblical snippets and replying to queries about these posts with tghe same religio-blipverts amounts to as much value as spam.

Sorry simon, I got to say that I'd prefer the threads to continue - I'm almost addicted to the fragility of the proof of Christianity.

Guys, I think we're getting off the point a bit here. To me, this is a discussion forum for individuals to express their views, essentially on the subjects of coding etc. By kind grace there is a chit-chat board.

To my mind, this chitchat board is categorically NOT a forum in which to bang any drum, be it political, religious,, moral or anything else to the intensity of that which J4U is doing.

By all means debate issues, any issues, but what J4U is doing is 'selling', or 'spamming' his religious wares because it makes him feel good about himself and not to canvass opinion or to open up any spirited discussion.

The propaganda moungering tactics he uses to sell his wares are tantamount to mis-use of these boards and as such I would advocate censure.

Look, the whole point here is that J4U insults the very notion of discussion.

I want to communicate with him. But, he has demonstrated repeatedly that he in not interested in debate. He throws quotes at us claiming to have Jesus communicate with us directly. Any question you put to him is met (if attall) only indirectly. He is derogetory towards those that he speaks at. I say AT and not TO because this is exactly what he does.

I happen to feel that the best way to communicate that to him is to (temporarilly) boycott his threads. Responding to his threads only reinforces his attitude. He doesn't read anything anyone says in response to his quotations (at least he doesn't give any indication of doing so).

Jim,

Its like the guy that comes up to you in the street and says he has a load of real Rolex watches.....

Fill in the blanks: _ _ _ _ up and smell the _ _ _ _ _ _

Don't believe me if you dont want - i couldn't give a toss - I really couldn't (and that goes for everyone else on this BBS!)....I just don't want to think that I stood by and let him find someone to mess up....

Quote:

---

Originally posted by crispin
Jim,

Its like the guy that comes up to you in the street and says he has a load of real Rolex watches.....

....

---

But I was so SURE they were real Rolices. Darn!

If you have some strong reason to think he's up to no good - operating for some sort of evil cult and is acting fraudulently for instance- then rather than you mentioning it here you should be bringing it to the attention of the Law! I suspect you're making an assumption based on what happened to your family- and by the way I don't question your word that somnething DID happen for a moment. I just question the link from that to here.

Personally I think he's a harmless twit and we should let him be. Rather than boycott him in the sense of not RESPONDING to his posts, if he sees that no-one is VIEWING them then he might cotton on to the fact that he's wasting his time.

I get what you're saying Jim - really I do, and I made my point anyway - so i'll leave it at that ;)

i'm off back to Post Race - theres a really good food fight going on in there right now.....

I agree with Jim, we can't judge someone who hasn't caused anything yet. Second we should skip this public disrespectful attitude and let those that actually are interested in what J4U has to say, reply without any kind of resistance.

http://www.vbforums.com/member.php?...fo&userid=23905

Kedaman

So are you asking people to boycott my boycott?

Quote:

---

I agree with Jim, we can't judge someone who hasn't caused anything yet.

---

I am only saying that we judge him on his actions so far.

I am not saying we boycott him because he is a lunatic christian, but moreover because he is an enemy to debate and discussion.

I am not objecting to the fact that he talks about religion, rather I object to the way he talks about it.

Lets just egg his car!

SImon
[QUOTE]Originally posted by simonm
Kedaman

So are you asking people to boycott my boycott?

Quote:

---

I am only saying that we judge him on his actions so far.

---

that was directed to crispin

Quote:

---

I am not saying we boycott him because he is a lunatic christian, but moreover because he is an enemy to debate and discussion.

---

If I avoid him, I personally avoid him for that reason, but i think it's disrespectful to make it public. I've heard a lot of complaints on this subject.

Quote:

---

I am not objecting to the fact that he talks about religion, rather I object to the way he talks about it.

---

How?

Kedaman

Quote:

---

If I avoid him, I personally avoid him for that reason, but i think it's disrespectful to make it public. I've heard a lot of complaints on this subject.

---

I have never felt the need to go this far with anyone I've ever encountered on this forum. Even those who have thrown insults and are agressive in the way they post I never felt that they should be boycotted (or banned).

I have never felt anyone to be a noose about the throat of reason as much as J4U. I find his attitude universally disrespectful to all members of this forum. I do not make this claim lightly.

If he doesn't want to debte the merrits of his faith/religion then fine, don't keep starting threads on the subject. But the way he he spouts his beliefs and then refuses blatantly to address anything that people say to him, conveys a sence of smugness and superiority that I find truly offensive.

I (and many others) have repeatedly tried to reason with him and get him to stop preaching and start debating but he is impervious to it. I honestly feel that the only way we can get through to him now is to boycott him.

We could always crucify him?

Ked,

These are just my opinions and fears - if you take notice of all my VB oriented replies to J4U they are always helpful and respectful, but I have serious doubts about his intentions, and have therefore expressed my concern and opinion. I am not disrespecting anyone, so dont judge me as being disrespectful. I dont want to talk about this anymore - it's becoming tedious and i've spent enough time in my life doing it already....yawn...

Believe what you want to believe......

Don't involve me any more please - any of you - i've said my piece - those are my personal views and opinions, and they are not up for debate.

Quote:

---

I find his attitude universally disrespectful to all members of this forum. I do not make this claim lightly.

---

This is higly debatable. Can you explicitely express his disrepect towards various kind of members?

Quote:

---

If he doesn't want to debte the merrits of his faith/religion then fine, don't keep starting threads on the subject. But the way he he spouts his beliefs and then refuses blatantly to address anything that people say to him, conveys a sence of smugness and superiority that I find truly offensive.

---

First, those who respond to him are either interested or wants to debate; the latter to also bend the "truth" to his disadvantage, that is entering his territory. IF he refuse to respond, then he looses the debate, and thats that. If you think he is arrogant, have he explicitely expressed this? If he has then the situation is clear, he has not earned YOUR respect, not everyones respect. There is no need for DISrespect, which is completely offensive in contrast to just no respect.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by crispin
Ked,

These are just my opinions and fears - if you take notice of all my VB oriented replies to J4U they are always helpful and respectful, but I have serious doubts about his intentions, and have therefore expressed my concern and opinion. I am not disrespecting anyone, so dont judge me as being disrespectful. I dont want to talk about this anymore - it's becoming tedious and i've spent enough time in my life doing it already....yawn...

Believe what you want to believe......

Don't involve me any more please - any of you - i've said my piece - those are my personal views and opinions, and they are not up for debate.

---

You don't have to show your arrogance just because he do if he do. Your expression here clearly shows your disrespect for him so I might as well judge you. I can though understand you are just tedious of this so it's totally ok if you take back your disrespectfull expressions.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by simonm


So are you asking people to Boycott my Boycott?

---

I think we should send Geoffrey round to duff up his wife and sisters.

Oh Ked......i'm not up for an argument about this, nor do I want to be judged by you. I'll be clear and consice.....

1. I'm not arrogant

2. I'm not disrespectful

3. I have fears for this persons intentions and have expressed them - how is that disrespectful?

4. Outline and please quote my disrespectful comments and describe how they are so please...and be detailed.

Kedaman

Quote:

---

This is higly debatable.

---

Fine, if you want to debate it, this is the place to do so.

Quote:

---

If you think he is arrogant, have he explicitely expressed this?

---

Yeah right, people always claim to be arogant, don't they?

Quote:

---

There is no need for DISrespect, which is completely offensive in contrast to just no respect.

---

Look, If people want to reply to his threads, they are going to despite whatever is said here.

I will no longer reply to (or view) his threads and I urge others who share my opinion to do the same.

crispin
Thanks for being clear and consice, I am sorry for demanding it and at all suggest to judge you, but I have heard of people who leaves this forum just because of the disrespectful attitudes been shown lately.

3a > I have fears for this persons intentions and have expressed them

"this persons"? Do you refer to a group of persons which has acted in a common way with common results or J4u himself?

3b > how is that disrespectful?

It is disrespectfull to publically suggest to avoid someone, however you are not disrespectful if you break this connection explicitely.

OK - i'll dissolve some ambiguity here.

"This persons" == This particular person, and only this person.

I have not said to people that they should avoid him, or tried to stop anyone from talking to him....

I have expressed my thoughts i.e. he should go == should be banned.

I have also expressed my perceived opinion of his intention, and tried to make it clear what I believe his intentions to be.

Although I have made it clear I have not attempted to encite or entice anyone to my opinions - I have in fact said the opposite:

QUOTE ME:

"Don't believe me if you dont want - i couldn't give a toss - I really couldn't (and that goes for everyone else on this BBS!)....I just don't want to think that I stood by and let him find someone to mess up...."

UNQUOTE ME

SO.....Please Ked now detail where EXACTLY I have suggested to people on this BBS to avoid J4U......

Simon

Quote:

---

Yeah right, people always claim to be arogant, don't they?

---

Sorry, I meant express his arrogance rather than to claim that he is arrogant

Quote:

---

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no need for DISrespect, which is completely offensive in contrast to just no respect.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look, If people want to reply to his threads, they are going to despite whatever is said here.

I will no longer reply to (or view) his threads and I urge others who share my opinion to do the same.

---

Have you changed your mind? Others will be infused with lack or disrespect towards J4U thanks to your suggestion of boycott.

Why don't you use your feckin ignore list, or I'll damn you to hell.:D

Kedaman

Quote:

---

Have you changed your mind? Others will be infused with lack or disrespect towards J4U thanks to your suggestion of boycott.

---

No, I have not changed my mind. My assertion is the same that I set out with when I began this thread and I don't need to reiterate them.

I don't think people will be infused with a dislike after anything I say about J4U. People will make up their own minds. It is not the purpose of this thread to encourage people to disrespect J4U. The purpose of this thread is to encourage other like minded people to embark on a particular course of action.

You underestimate the other people on this forum to such an extent that it borders on being disrespectful. You are suggesting that they are not capable of making up their own minds.

crispin

Quote:

---

Originally posted by crispin
[B]
"This persons" == This particular person, and only this person.

---

Ok.

Quote:

---

I have not said to people that they should avoid him, or tried to stop anyone from talking to him....

---

I can now say that you implicitely suggest it.

Quote:

---

I have expressed my thoughts i.e. he should go == should be banned.
I have also expressed my perceived opinion of his intention, and tried to make it clear what I believe his intentions to be.

---

Have you seen those thread with typical insults; "Is denniswrenn a retard?" for instance. That question isn't directly an insult, but it does suggest it. The poll was closed because leaving it open could accumulate disrepsect towards Dennis. Similarily your suggestion could accumulate disrespect towards J4U which is inself an implicit act of disrespect. It is not wrong to disrespect but to express disrespect is offensive.

Quote:

---

"Don't believe me if you dont want - i couldn't give a toss - I really couldn't (and that goes for everyone else on this BBS!)....I just don't want to think that I stood by and let him find someone to mess up...."

---

You could have warned about the common results of the common action, your reference to J4u makes a personal attack.

I hope you take back this personal part of your expression.

Ok Ked,


Please consider "I just don't want to think that I stood by and let him find someone to mess up...."

changed to:

""


i.e. I take it back ;). I bear him no personal grudge....

* but I still respectfully fear for his intentions :( and that is my right.

Peace to ya Ked, and may the rest of your day be v.cool...

I dont understand all this disrespect stuff. I mean it is not like the world is populated by green fairies and everyone is equally nice to each other. Of course there is disrespect as well as hate, love, etc etc. I think that Simon, Crispin etc have every right to feel as they do towards j4u. And Kedaman, I would be amazed if you had never been disrespectful to people in your life. And if you haven't then what can i say.. u are either infinitely patient or a fence sitter.

Anyways, back to j4u. I think he is a complete loonie, crazier than a coconut (to quote a current song) and the so called disrespectful posts are mostly piss taking. Noone threatens him or swears at him etc. I don't respect him at all and dont mind saying it. I could say i do because that is the right thing to do but that would be lying. So Simon, post what u want about ur boycott. I wont be boycotting his threads becos they are a good laugh with gaffer, chris etc and jimbo in monty python mode.

You seem to have grand ideas Kedaman but i sometimes think that you lack maturity and the experience of life. And i dont mean that u have to surrender to the status quo of today's society but you also cannot dismiss simply because it doesnt meet your theories.

I respect your views even though I dont agree with much that you say but you approach it in a deliberate and honest way. J4u on the other hand is a complete prat that makes my spine tingle!! :D

If you like reading J4Us contributions to the forum, do so (you get to quote lines from Monty Python films at least :D )

If you don't like reading them, don't read them.

To be honest, I don't think he even knows what half the stuff he posts really means anyway.

PS who u think was worse for cricket? Geoffrey Boycott or Bruce Tavare??? :p

Simon

Quote:

---

I don't think people will be infused with a dislike after anything I say about J4U. People will make up their own minds. It is not the purpose of this thread to encourage people to disrespect J4U. The purpose of this thread is to encourage other like minded people to embark on a particular course of action.

---

Unfortunately your weapon is a double-edged sword.

Quote:

---

You underestimate the other people on this forum to such an extent that it borders on being disrespectful. You are suggesting that they are not capable of making up their own minds.

---

When you define the runtime function O(n) of an algoritm you do the most pessimistic assumptions, resulting in worst case n for O. Similarily I do the most pessimistic interpretation of the results of your expression. Also a parallell to the Dennis Wrenn thread, I bet that all would have voted no but it still leaves an open door to those who have something against him.

All people here are definitely not mature enough to do the objective decision. I think nobody can't be and that most would be affected more or less by your source of disrespect.

Kedaman

Quote:

---

All people here are definitely not mature enough to do the objective decision. I think nobody can't be and that most would be affected more or less by your source of disrespect.

---

He is his own source of disrespect.

I wish to try and get through to him and I can't see a better way to do it. If you have a better proposal, let me know.

crispin
Peace to you too :)

beachbum

Quote:

---

Originally posted by beachbum
[B]I dont understand all this disrespect stuff. I mean it is not like the world is populated by green fairies and everyone is equally nice to each other. Of course there is disrespect as well as hate, love, etc etc. I think that Simon, Crispin etc have every right to feel as they do towards j4u. And Kedaman, I would be amazed if you had never been disrespectful to people in your life. And if you haven't then what can i say.. u are either infinitely patient or a fence sitter.

---

Hate all you want, but you don't have to hit the one you hate for that reason. You can't undermine your hate but you can avoid the transplantation of furhter hate and make something productive out of it. I do have disrespectful attitudes to people in my life but i mostly keep them to myself, or i can go talk to the one i hate and resolve the problems and go home happy, but i rarely spread my disrespect.

Quote:

---

You seem to have grand ideas Kedaman but i sometimes think that you lack maturity and the experience of life. And i dont mean that u have to surrender to the status quo of today's society but you also cannot dismiss simply because it doesnt meet your theories.

---

Great! You are judging my maturity now, now where am I naive?
I am 21 and I haven't been exposed to the whole world yet, but does that have to shut my mouth until i've seen it all? Have anyone? Even a considerably important fraction?
If you want to prevent me from expressing my ideas, I beg you explicitely mention what misinformation I'm spreading.

Quote:

---

I respect your views even though I dont agree with much that you say but you approach it in a deliberate and honest way. J4u on the other hand is a complete prat that makes my spine tingle!! :D

---

Come on and debate then, if you can't debate with J4u then you have me :D

Simon

Quote:

---

Originally posted by simonm
Kedaman
He is his own source of disrespect.

---

This is debatable. You know US can be considered it's own source of disrespect and you may ask if the naive americans should just shut up and give a **** about others, and that all damage caused by terrorism is just their own fault for being naive and disrespectful as well as ideologically wounerable. This kind of attitude advocates further conflict and war, something which the modern ideal human being should consider wrong.

Quote:

---

I wish to try and get through to him and I can't see a better way to do it. If you have a better proposal, let me know.

---

Then you should do that without pointing a sword at him.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kedaman
Hate all you want, but you don't have to hit the one you hate for that reason. You can't undermine your hate but you can avoid the transplantation of furhter hate and make something productive out of it. I do have disrespectful attitudes to people in my life but i mostly keep them to myself, or i can go talk to the one i hate and resolve the problems and go home happy, but i rarely spread my disrespect.

---

LOL I don't hate anyone. But at the same time I dont feel the need to bottle every emotion about people. There is no life obligation to like everyone equally. Might sound cold but I (and i am sure many others) use perceptions of people we meet and act accordingly.

Quote:

---

Great! You are judging my maturity now, now where am I naive? I am 21 and I haven't been exposed to the whole world yet, but does that have to shut my mouth until i've seen it all? Have anyone? Even a considerably important fraction?
If you want to prevent me from expressing my ideas, I beg you explicitely mention what misinformation I'm spreading.

---

Hmm, I never once mentioned anything about preventing you expressing your ideas. I merely said that i dont agree with them all. I am allowed that view as much as you ar allowed yours. In regard to maturity it may be a translation issue but it is not in reference to you dropping your pants at passing buses. I am commenting on my perception of your solutions to world problems etc. Again, I dont think bad of you for dreaming this way in the same way that I wish kids would never lose their innocence (oh gawd pls dont join them together as a perceived insult!! :p ). But I feel that your views lack the tempering of 'reality'.

"Vincent, this world was never meant for one as beautiful as you"

Quote:

---

Come on and debate then, if you can't debate with J4u then you have me :D [/B]

---

I would love to debate but i have had a few beers and some very strange liquer containing gold flakes and am about to head off to la la land.

Anyhow, I still stick with my view that j4u is a looney bin and that I can think that way without worrying about or even contemplating the views of others. It doesnt make me evil. Hell, I have only murdered 2 people... oops did I think that or write it.
Ok Kedaman, time for u to bash the keys!! :D

I have started a new thread that will be my only one.
:)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by beachbum
[B]
LOL I don't hate anyone.

---

Sure you do ;) probably everyone does :p

Anyways, I meant disrespect, it just happened to be an expression you use for hate as well.

Quote:

---

Hmm, I never once mentioned anything about preventing you expressing your ideas. I merely said that i dont agree with them all.

---

Okay we are both immature :)

Quote:

---

I am allowed that view as much as you ar allowed yours. In regard to maturity it may be a translation issue but it is not in reference to you dropping your pants at passing buses. I am commenting on my perception of your solutions to world problems etc.

---

WORLD PROBLEMS?! Okay now, have we suddenly jumped of the subject lol :D

Quote:

---

Again, I dont think bad of you for dreaming this way in the same way that I wish kids would never lose their innocence (oh gawd pls dont join them together as a perceived insult!! :p ). But I feel that your views lack the tempering of 'reality'.

"Vincent, this world was never meant for one as beautiful as you"

---

OMG, if you want to debate about reality, there is a thread for that, always ;)

Quote:

---

I would love to debate but i have had a few beers and some very strange liquer containing gold flakes and am about to head off to la la land.

---

Have fun mate :)

Quote:

---

Anyhow, I still stick with my view that j4u is a looney bin and that I can think that way without worrying about or even contemplating the views of others.

---

Go with your ideas, just don't pollute it all down here :)

Kedaman

You are misunderstanding the whole point of this thread. I am not spreading disrespect for J4U.

Quote:

---

This is debatable. You know US can be considered it's own source of disrespect and you may ask if the naive americans should just shut up and give a **** about others, and that all damage caused by terrorism is just their own fault for being naive and disrespectful as well as ideologically wounerable. This kind of attitude advocates further conflict and war, something which the modern ideal human being should consider wrong.

---

This is all very well but I am not saying that we do anything bad to J4U. I am suggesting that the best way to get through to him is to boycott his threads. I'm not saying that we go out and attack him or cause him to suffer in anyway.

Quote:

---

Then you should do that without pointing a sword at him.

---

This "sword" exists only in your imaginiation.

Quote:

---

You know US can be considered it's own source of disrespect and you may ask if the naive americans should just shut up and give a **** about others, and that all damage caused by terrorism is just their own fault for being naive and disrespectful as well as ideologically wounerable. This kind of attitude advocates further conflict and war, something which the modern ideal human being should consider wrong.

---

Kedaman.....painting all American's with the same brush due to people like jesus4u, and patooey is as bad as saying all Muslims are evil due to the actions of a minority. To quote your own words "This kind of attitude advocates further conflict and war, something which the modern ideal human being should consider wrong. " The majority of the people who posted in this thread are not Americans anyway so BACK OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally posted by barrk


Kedaman.....painting all American's with the same brush due to people like jesus4u, and patooey is as bad as saying all Muslims are evil due to the actions of a minority. To quote your own words "This kind of attitude advocates further conflict and war, something which the modern ideal human being should consider wrong. " The majority of the people who posted in this thread are not Americans anyway so BACK OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---

Geez! I didn't say that. I said "can be considered" which is what, i shouldn't actually say; but i've heard a lot of people is of this opinion.

Hey, SimonM, I'll join your boycott!

That guy sucks, big time!

I wouldn't bother about it really...No one else seems to be paying much attention.

It seems that some people still believe they can have a reasonable discusison with him. :rolleyes:

I agree! Following Jesus is VERY logical If you give Him a chance.

Maybe you'd like to prove that without just bleating bible quotes at people. And maybe you'd like to do it in the thread you said you would do it in. ie the one you started.

Jesus4u

Quote:

---

I agree! Following Jesus is VERY logical If you give Him a chance.

---

Yeah, very logical, if you build a whole logical framework around the assumption that everything in the bible must be true.

Why is it you assume that we're not giving it a chance? I have repeatedly put points to you, points that you have failed to address. I'm fed up trying to get an intelligent response from you and I'm suprised others persist.

If you start with the assmption that Jesus (and all that's said about him) is true and all you ever do is try to make the facts fit with your prior assumption, how is that logical?

I did say when I started the other thread that I would not limit myself to that thread only.

To answer the second comment, I have proven this over and over again. One day, hopefully, you will see the light.:)

Jesus4u (or what ever your name is), why don't you just keep your bull**** out of this thread and I'll stay out of yours!

Agreed?

(unless, of couse, you actually want to specifically address anything I've said to/about you).

Quote:

---

Originally posted by jesus4u
I did say when I started the other thread that I would not limit myself to that thread only.

To answer the second comment, I have proven this over and over again. One day, hopefully, you will see the light.:)

---

Don't be so f***ing patronising you irritating little man. You aren't doing anything for your cause, you're just making everyone hate you by posting patronising bollocks like that.

You haven't proven f*** all, you've just quoted from the bible, and from some of your self-serving sites that tell you how the bible proves Christianity true. That's all completely useless, and only an idiot wouldn't see it.

Maybe one day you'll see the light and realise that you can't prove something you've already assumed to be true.

Go take some f***cking propositional logic classes and stop polluting the forum with your mindless 'logic'.

j4u

Looking back at the posts on this thread, it's nice to see the effect of Jesus first hand, bring unity, peace and harmony to all people...

I was going to reply to your PM, but I feel I must do it here:

You may believe what you are doing is for the benefit of all, but with so many diffr'nt strokes to move the world, you may have to suffer the slings and arrows...

Quote:

---

Originally posted by jesus4u
One day, hopefully, you will see the light.:)

---

Ouch! :D Thats pious with a BIG P

I can handle the arrrows. When you care about someone you can take it :)

You know, I have to the best of my ability answered all of your questions. If I missed some I apologize. If you take the time to do the research yourself about Jesus you will find that there is irrefutable proof of his claims.

Let it be known, I do not pretend to know ALL the answers.
But I share what I do know..

:)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by simonm
Look, the whole point here is that J4U insults the very notion of discussion.

I want to communicate with him. But, he has demonstrated repeatedly that he in not interested in debate. He throws quotes at us claiming to have Jesus communicate with us directly. Any question you put to him is met (if attall) only indirectly. He is derogetory towards those that he speaks at. I say AT and not TO because this is exactly what he does.

I happen to feel that the best way to communicate that to him is to (temporarilly) boycott his threads. Responding to his threads only reinforces his attitude. He doesn't read anything anyone says in response to his quotations (at least he doesn't give any indication of doing so).

---

I don't read? Blanket statement!

Okay, fine, J4U. Simon was wrong, you do read.

But he was right about every other point. You have never addressed my issue. You have never given me an answer, no matter how much I hound you.

Is it true that your god created man out of vanity and that he enforces worship with terror and fear? You have described your god in no other manner, so we can only conclude that this must be true. Now once and for all, answer the accusations or never ever make another post to this board again.

J4u, I feel the need to post this again since you seem to think you've answered questions 'to the best of your ability'.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by HarryW
Don't be so f***ing patronising you irritating little man. You aren't doing anything for your cause, you're just making everyone hate you by posting patronising bollocks like that.

You haven't proven f*** all, you've just quoted from the bible, and from some of your self-serving sites that tell you how the bible proves Christianity true. That's all completely useless, and only an idiot wouldn't see it.

Maybe one day you'll see the light and realise that you can't prove something you've already assumed to be true.

Go take some f***cking propositional logic classes and stop polluting the forum with your mindless 'logic'.

---

If the answers you've give were 'to the best of your ability' then you believe this stuff very easily. You can't have given it much thought if you can't come up with any decent reasons for believing it other than bible quotes. Judging by your logic skills, I can't say I'm optimistic about finding the evidence it took for you to believe to be at all convincing.

You still haven't even vaguely responded to CiberTHuG's question either, even though this must be about the fourth time he's posted it.

Guys,

So far this week I have kept well away from posting on the J4U issue. I intend to do so in future. However, I would make the point again to you that the guy you're dealing with 'NEEDS' to preach, to feel he is an upstanding 'Christian'. He 'NEEDS' to do this for himself, to make himself worth something, to be noticed.
His rhetoric has very little to do with christianity it has to do with the ego of a very sad individual.

All of you who have attempted to engage him in debate have done so valliantly, in a constrained and educated manner, but have failed miserably.

For a time, J4U was confined to his own thread. I feel that was working as the boards were not polluted. Resurrecting these threads only feeds his ego and gives him what he craves.

I'm not saying ignore him if you don't wan't to, but you only have to look at his replies to note how arrogant, conceited and condescending he is being. That is not Christian behaviour. He never answers any of your questions to your saisfaction and I do feel ultimately, he beleives himself to be a martyr taking the 'slings and arrows' for his 'belief's as Gaffer put it.

That's what he wants from you and you're giving it to him and rather than being disappointed that you have'nt seen his particular brand of light, he's ecstatic about feeling he's being martyred for his cause.


FBP

FATBOYPEE

Quote:

---

He never answers any of your questions to your saisfaction

---

My point exactly!
Jesus4u

Quote:

---

You know, I have to the best of my ability answered all of your questions. If I missed some I apologize.

---

You've never even attempted to address any of the points I have put to you. I have even responded to some of the, so called "proofs" that you have posted but these have, once again, been ignored.

You think you are being strong for standing up for what you believe in? Twaddle (for want of a more offensive word)! If you really cared in the slightest about bringing us into the "light", you would make more of an attempt to explain things to us on our level as does Tygur. Take a leaf out of his book, he talks to us and not at us.

You're so pompous and puffed up with self righteousness that you are blinded by the light of your own halo. To you, we are no more than skunk rats skittering around your feet. Why should you "muddy" yourself by stooping down to really speak with us?