ijkl
Printable View
ijkl
mnop
qrst
uvwx
yz01
2345
6789
Muwahaha! Power of no 30 second wait
I can post... FOREVER!
Size 6 post
Size 1 post
I need to write an auto bot to write this carp for me!
You get it, carp?
Like the fish that's crap.
Magikarp!
Splash
That was it's only move.
Until level 15 then it learned tackle.
And then at level 20 it evolved into the OP Garados!
I had difficulties understanding that as well, but it could be my complete lack of knowledge on the topic.
At the risk of upsetting DD by reintroducing politics back into post race I'll explain. Through the 60s the UK used to run two kinds of schools, Grammars and Secondary Moderns. The idea was that academically gifted kids would go to Grammars while less gifted kids would go to Secondary Moderns. Which you went to was decided by a test you sat at age 11 called the 11+. The idea was that Grammar schools kids would be pushed harder and progress at a faster rate while SM kids would still be pushed but not so hard that they'd be left behind. It was an attempt to progress each kid as fast as they could handle. Sadly the reality tended to be that the Secondary Moderns were underfunded and just became dumping grounds.
In the 70s (I think) the labour party largely abolished both (there are a few exceptions still floating around) and replace them with comprehensives where all kids would attend the same classes regardless of ability. I personally think this was just throwing the baby out with the bath water and means that in a given class you're either going to have gifted kids being held back or weaker kids just being left behind. Actually, you probably get both as the class gets pitched at the centre of the bell curve.
I personally think that streaming by ability is pretty much a no brainer, as long as you're not under funding those at the back and you allow kids to move up and down streams as appropriate. Probably separating them into different schools was a bit daft but, in the UK, they're not even separated into different classes.
Anyway, politics over...
Moar Size 6 Posts!
lol....this place panders to feminism like nearly all mainstream sites. If you want sites that haven't been touched by feminism try 4chan.org or the red pill reddit.
Anyways, the reason I ask is that the topic being discussed, the wage gender gap issue is actually feminist trolling. In other words, its not a real topic, just mental masturbation by hardcore feminists that somehow managed to get taken seriously by the mainstream.
No, not really. The gender gap is a real thing with multiple causes. It is going away, bit by bit, but it still exists. It also starts very early on and persists. As women increasingly outnumber men in higher education, it seems likely to reverse. There will always be a difference, though, and that's a good thing.
I've never ever seen this occur in real life. To me, its a myth that was the product of careful wordplay and deliberate misinterpretation of statistical data. I don't know anyone who would actually say to themselves or anyone that they would pay someone less for the same job simply because they are a woman. This flies in the face of basic common sense and feminism is devoid of common sense.
Imagine a world without children... Future generations will thank us!
I have seen it happen, to a small extent. This was a bigger issue a few decades back, which is before I entered the labor force. It was certainly an issue for an earlier generation.
Yeh i was tempted to reply to a few posts BUT this is post race and i feel i have sullied it enough already!!!Quote:
Anyway, politics over...
In my experience Humans are really excellent at flying in the face of common senseQuote:
This flies in the face of basic common sense
In fact i would go as far as to say we do few things better.
:thumb:
The thumb is my favorite smiley.
Any time I rep anyone I just type it in the comment.
It's like, "Good Job Mate" only in a Australian accent.
I like to pretend that everyone on VBForums has an Australian accent except for JMcIlhinney.
I hate having flies in my face, and I'm sure common sense does too. However, I know this because flies like eyes. Common sense doesn't have any "I"s, but I'm sure that flies are still attracted to its face because they like to annoy common sense as much as they like to annoy me. Heck, most of them don't even land, they just fly back and forth trying to stick their tongues out at me...but they can't because they are flies and don't have tongues. It's really frustrating for all involved.
I know people who fly in the face of common sense so often they hover a couple of feet off the ground.
Scanning through the last three or four pages of post race I thought.
"Man if I ever got writers block post race would stir the pot right quick."
Something, Something, ... and that's how they earned street smarts. :)
Well hello, Patrick...
Meet ‘Patrick’: The robotic proctology-simulation ass
Attachment 126853
Now there's some serious software development right there.
How the HELL do you find this stuff????
broke left wrist today. typyngwith 1 hand. need pain killers,,,
Were you trying out Patrick a bit too vigorously?
That actually made me laugh out load in the office this morning, i got a few strange glances from my fellow workers :)Quote:
Were you trying out Patrick a bit too vigorously?
I heard that Patrick's an ass.
And that his job also stinks.
I really hope that the doctors don't mistake the glue for lube.
Now you're just being tacky
The doctor who did physicals for our department also played in the community league basketball tournaments. Guys were terrified that he'd break his finger, or jam it badly.
The brook in my backyard
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8702/1...93dac96c_z.jpg
That is very pretty.
There's a bunch of shade for some good fishing.
We added that line of small stones last summer - over a foot in depth. During the winter and all it back filled naturally with sand and silt and now really holds back that higher ponded area.
And it makes for a nice white noise that I can hear from by bedroom.
We regularly get great blue heron sneaking along looking for a bite. Kingfishers, river otter, fisher cats (they say - I've not seen them). Got a beaver dam about 1000 feet downstream.
Duck's love the algae - they would nest except for the fact that their is a dam and holding reservoir upstream and they alter the water level easily 2 feet up and down to manage area drinking water supply. That image is a very low moment for water - that row of small stones should be fully submerged.
Anyone got any ideas for a bridge that could span the 30 feet or so?
I have only seen one Fisher EVER, and that was in New Hampshire on a day when the crust of the snow was strong enough to support my weight. I think it allowed me to move quietly enough that it didn't hear me coming.
I miss the New England forests.
I DON'T miss the New England insects.