And, of course it got it wrong. Had you included my name spelled correctly, then it certainly would have known.
Printable View
And, of course it got it wrong. Had you included my name spelled correctly, then it certainly would have known.
It really did not matter because as I was typing, swiftly figured out that it was futile since I am the best, so kinda flogged the names quickly.
It's GoreTex!Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e58SiFSxLs
Isn't Tex Gore one of Al's cousins from out west?
"Windows 12" will require onboard AI hardware?
https://youtu.be/M7N--Zf-Ypo
Considering that "onboard AI hardware" probably means, "a good video card", I'm not sure that's a huge lift. The rest of the video is much more interesting, in my view.
Please try to write a poem or a more pertinent comment to this great programmer inventor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Porter
vfb ,visual freebasic ide,like vb7
http://www.yfvb.com/soft-48.htm
Origin of VisualFreeBasic
Since the birth of FreeBASIC for more than ten years, its IDE has been in the state of code editor, and there is no automatic processing, except for experienced programmers who can use it. Novices have no way to start and simply don't know where to start. Until 2015, FireFly software developed by Paul Squires (nationality: Canada) appeared, which greatly simplified FB programming and enabled novices to write software in FB.
Although FireFly has brought great progress to FB's IDE, many of them are not satisfactory, so at the end of 2016, Yongfang began to patch FireFly for more than two years. Because there is no source code, it can only be patched with DLL combined with plug-in technology. I have gradually accumulated a lot of experience in doing IDE in my research on FireFly.
It has been very mature since FireFly 3.X was patched for more than two years, and it was named VisualFreeBasic 4.X However, due to the lack of IDE source code, it was impossible to continue to improve and add better functions. So in June 2019, VFB5 was written from scratch with VFB4, and it took five months (with experience and imitation, and a lot of code written for FireFly before, It was written in a short time, and if there was nothing, it was written by Yong Fang alone, and a stable beta version was published, so VisualFreeBasic5 was born. Programming is endless, life is endless, and improvement is endless. VisualFreeBasic will get better and better.
Many people will question? FireFly 3.X hasn't been updated for so many years? Yes, it hasn't been updated, because FireFly was developed with PowerBASIC, not FreeBASIC. The original wanted to develop with FreeBASIC. Since 2017, the software named WinFBE has been developed, and it is open source, but the development efficiency is too low. After three years, the software looks like a semi-finished product, and it is only suitable for experts to play, but novices can't play at all, and it seriously deviates from the original FireFly way.
WinFBE, an IDE that has been in development for many years, has a very simple interface like twinbasic.And I tested that he didn't have such a language pack.
This author has previously developed another version of the IDE designed to be more powerful, similar to the vB6, but lacking many features.The latest version, I did a test two days ago.I found it very difficult to create a new form. But after learning it, I feel it is more convenient, but the function is too simple.
Just like ie11 failed, the development of edge failed again, and then everything was thrown away directly, the Google kernel was put in, and the interface development was better, more functional and more convenient.I am very satisfied that the result is finally successful.
The author of VfB has been developing for 7 years. How many 7 or 10 years can be wasted in a person's life.
The product itself is also free, and he gets very little return from it, maybe only $500. Seven years of work is not as good as someone else's income in a day.
On the contrary, if all his interfaces can be readjusted to make the simplest interface, it will be better to use.
just like vb6 ide addin,vba addin,You can delete any menu. Or increase the functionality of the tab.
Now there are so many functions of the software。I don't think it's very convenient to use.
Our this forum website, I feel is VB6 the most authentic exchange big station.
Maybe there is a greater community.
If I ask AI to tell me the 10 most famous and active VB communities.
It seems that no one has used this software seriously in our forum.So I hope someone can try it and give me the most pertinent evaluation.
Is this software easy to use? How about his design idea? Why does a person persist in developing for such a long time?
What's a miniblink?This is a free minified version of Google Kernel.
I didn't develop him either.And the sharepdevelp development tool
I admire these three softwares very much.
I like free things best. It can be used without spending money.
This was done with a collaboration request from a well-known software company, as well as the opportunity to develop with the author of C#。
It should be said that he developed a free product, and then he finally became famous and got money in return. But he still offers a free version.
Miniblink is a brand-new browser kernel project that pursues extreme com
pactness.
Based on the latest version of chromium kernel, it removes all the redundant components of chromium and only keeps the most basic typesetting engine blink.
Miniblink maintains a minimalist size of about 10M, which is the smallest size of all similar products, and supports windows xp and npapi at the same time.
Now the latest version is about 30 megabytes.
Google Kernel, version 75. Google has now reached the 130 or so version.
Maybe the old version can achieve most of the functions.
If the new version is simplified, the workload is very large.
edge webview2,There are three versions of this, basically around 400 megabytes.
Compared with this, the volume is reduced by 10 times. Most of the functions can be realized.
The main reason I say this is that these people have invented some great products. What are they doing with this great software? Why can it last for 5 years and 10 years?
And out comes a man from Mars
And you try to run but he's got a gun
And he shoots you dead and he eats your head
And then you're in the man from Mars
You go out at night eatin' cars
You eat Cadillacs, Lincolns too
Mercurys and Subaru
And you don't stop, you keep on eatin' cars
Then, when there's no more cars you go out at night
And eat up bars where the people meet
Xiaoyao, you have to be the first programmer on the planet to ask someone to ask ChatGPT to write something for you when you can ask this AI yourself. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by xiaoyaoPlease try to write a poem or a more pertinent comment to this great programmer inventor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Porter
vfb ,visual freebasic ide,like vb7
http://www.yfvb.com/soft-48.htm
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by xiaoyao
ChatGPT couldn't list any forum where there are posts on WinFBE, if that's what you're writing about.Quote:
Originally Posted by xiaoyao
Are you the author of WinFBE? :rolleyes: If not, no one is stopping you from trying it yourself. :bigyello:Quote:
Originally Posted by xiaoyao
I never heard of it. Glad you asked yourself! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by xiaoyao
You know everything you wrote above comes off as spam.
It does, but it isn't. It's the result of some poor translation software. True idiomatic Chinese and true idiomatic English don't translate all that well. We say things that make sense to others who speak the language, but if translated literally, they make very little sense at all.
Eerie thought. Does this (or possibly future) service do things like accept a description, nickname, and a few constraining factors about a person and then run through its database of scraped data to present a doxing profile on your target or a list of probable matching individuals?
Or is that what some of the posts above were describing?
Perhaps in the future but not now. GPT-4 has recently added the ability to browse the internet, click links and parse the content. Google Bard was also recently opened to the public with web browsing capabilities. One of the first things I did was to tell both of them to go on VBForums.com and tell me about me about myself, giving it my handle, Niya. The idea was to see if these AIs have the ability to target and scrape my posts specifically, process them and do up a profile on me. They both failed. However, this doesn't mean they won't be able to do this by next year but for now, they can't.Quote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
Ok wow.....I just decided to test GPT-4 again after making the above post and it seems Open AI has already fixed it. I gave it this query:-
And after about a minute of scraping scraping the web:-Quote:
Go on VBForums and tell me something about the user Niya.
https://www.vbforums.com/images/ieimages/2023/05/13.png
It came up with this:-
This information is 100% accurate. It wasn't capable of the first week or so of it's release. I guess it is now.Quote:
Niya is a very active user on VBForums, a platform dedicated to discussions related to Visual Basic and VB .NET. They joined the forum in November 2011 and, as of the last post I found, they have contributed over 8,410 posts1.
Their activity spans a range of topics. For instance, in July 2021, Niya started a thread about a simple web server they developed using pure VB.Net code. In the thread, they shared that the project started as a small sample but grew as they added more functionality. Niya intended this project to be a teaching tool, providing insights into how web servers work, including aspects like 404 errors, favicons, redirects, and downloads. They cautioned that the project is not intended for building real websites, but rather for demonstration and learning purposes. The project requires Visual Studio 2019 and .Net 5 to open and compile2.
When asked by another forum member if it was possible to return actual web pages with a form and process them upon a POST request, Niya confirmed that it was indeed possible. They described the server as a "real web server in every sense of the word," albeit a skeleton implementation without all the features of a production-quality web server3.
However, I was not able to find more recent posts from Niya due to limited browsing time. There may be more recent contributions by Niya that I have not discovered yet.
Ok it seem it has limits. I asked it a follow up question about me:-
It tried for a minute again, making various searches and it came up with this:-Quote:
Tell me about Niya's political leanings.
I guess it cannot yet target specific information about users on a website based on limiting criteria like political beliefs. So I guess for now, we are safe from AI based censorship.Quote:
I'm sorry, but I wasn't able to find specific information on Niya's political leanings from the VBForums site. While I was able to find various posts by Niya, none of them explicitly mentioned or implied political beliefs or stances. Niya seems to be primarily focused on technical discussions related to programming and the use of Visual Basic.
Please note that political leanings or beliefs are often considered private, and users on a programming forum like VBForums may choose not to share such information. If you have any other queries or need information on a different topic, feel free to ask.
I guess I'd worry more about responses to queries asking for home address, phone numbers, employer, investments, net worth, account numbers, typical daily itinerary, sleep schedule, etc.
I can imagine narrower and more specific things like "home and work addresses of drivers of vehicles with quickly removable high value parts within 60 miles of me." Or even specific make, model, year vehicles when a quick and easy theft exploit becomes known.
In that case, I wouldn't worry too much. Because currently, these AI tools like Bard and ChatGPT do it no differently to us meaning if you can't find that information using a casual Google search, AI is not going to find it either. I mean if I could find that information myself without AI, that might be the actual problem. Currently AI doesn't make the impossible possible. It only speeds up what is already possible.
However, it doesn't mean that organizations can't attach AI to internal proprietary searching technology to do it. I could imagine the NSA, CIA or FBI doing something like this.
I'm less concerned that AI has magical powers or access to data we can't all find. I'm more worried about the breadth of the database it works from, built over time, and its ability to do fairly fast and robust searches, correlation, and distillation of the data to order.
It sounds like your experience suggests that it doesn't yet work from accumulated data, instead doing web searches to fulfill requests. I guess that would limit its power to some extent by limiting the practical amount of data it can winnow today.
Yea, this is a legitimate concern. If someone manages to get a hold of a large cache of personal data, AI will be able to do a lot of very very scary things with it. I'm willing to bet intelligence agencies around the world are already salivating over this.Quote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
Yea, this is the current state of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
They also has built-in artificial time limits. They are only allowed to search for a finite amount of time so if it can't find the information within a few minutes it will time out. I don't think this is for moral reasons though. I believe this is simply because of cost. A single query to ChatGPT costs something like 100K I think.
I was going to mention it didn't mention your political leanings but you beat me to it...;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
It may not be able to figure it out today but as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, it will be capable of such discernment in the future. Big tech tends to lean hard left and one of the defining features of leftism is an insatiable hunger to impose leftist morality upon everyone they can. I have no doubt that the web-scraping AIs of the future will be able to identify users on forums espousing unsanctioned beliefs which will then be used to persecuting them in various ways from forum bans and doxxing to outright criminal prosecution.Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
This was the exact reason I tested Bard and ChatGPT with those queries. I wanted to see how far along big tech was in their ability to detect people like me with unsanctioned beliefs. Seems I have some time left ;)
You just don't get it...the country is leaning left. Society and the media just reflect that. The right feels left behind and consider it some kind of conspiracy. The truth is society is moving away from them.Quote:
Big tech tends to lean hard left and one of the defining features of leftism is an insatiable hunger to impose leftist morality upon everyone they can.
I wanted to give Google's Bard a try, but it's not available for Germany and all the other EU countries because of our data protection and privacy laws.
Might be the same for ChatGPT 4, but I'm still using the free version.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
As long as you don't post a call to arms manifesto, you have all the time in the world. :bigyello:
That is very very bad. If these countries don't get over whatever it is they fear, they will be left behind. Access to powerful AIs is going to be essential in the near future if a country wants to remain competitive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Porter
Anheuser-Busch thought so too. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
It won't take anything that drastic. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Porter
Touché...but Fox news making a major narrative over it was a big part of it. Same thing they did to Target over LGBTQ clothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
Fox News? hahaha :lol:....Fox News is irrelevant here. Twitter is the driving force behind this. Ordinary and famous folk alike speaking up on Twitter is where this all began. Fox News had nothing to do with it. They only really started paying attention after the boycott went viral on Twitter. They are just spectators in this whole thing.
Don't take this the wrong way but some of you here really need to start getting into social media. It feels like you're so out of touch. You're clinging to corporate media as if they are still relevant. Us young folk, we're on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube etc. That's where you go to take the pulse of culture, not Fox News lol.
Here's a small tip. Go on Twitter and see what's trending. More than a few times you're going to hit on something that the corporate media like Fox News and CNN will be talking about next week. They're always late to the party lol....Now not everything that is trending on Twitter blows up but there is where you can get in on current events early.
Social media also gives you something corporate media can't, which is quick and reliable feedback from the people. I mean when you watch a story on CNN or Fox, you really have no idea what the other people watching it are thinking. You don't know if they're angry, sad or happy but on social media, you find out very quickly where the wind is blowing on any particular event.
TLDR; You need to get with the times man :D
Molson Coors (Miller Lite) tried a spoof ad campaign trying to profit off the backlash against the ill-conceived Bud Light campaign. But it used such a heavy hand that stung-once consumers mostly didn't grasp its sarcasm, and neither did the small minority who the Bud Light campaign had tried to bootlick. Some really wacky ads about women inventing beer.
Reminds me of a song:
"Trogs to the right of me, nutjobs to the left, here I am: stuck in the middle with you."
This whole BudLight fiasco has provided me with a lot of entertainment. It's fun watching these companies run around like headless chickens trying to figure out what is happening. I find it hilarious that none of these companies understand why this revolt is happening. They keep looking for the answer everywhere except where they will actually get them.
Perhaps related:
https://youtu.be/fv_PoLtfk5s
U.S. Political Ideology Steady; Conservatives, Moderates TieQuote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
While a near-total grasp of media has slowly moved the needle, neither wishing nor shouting will make it so.Quote:
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Conservatives and moderates still tied as largest ideological groups
Liberals remain the smallest group at 25%
Republicans' and Democrats' ideological identification unchanged
While we don't have more recent figures, the trends suggest a possible move further back into moderation.Quote:
Half of Democrats Still Identify as Liberal
The increase in Americans' liberal identification since the early '90s has occurred mainly among Democrats, but that has leveled off in recent years. Last year marks the fifth straight year that the percentage of Democrats describing themselves as liberal (50%) was in the 49% to 51% range after reaching that point in 2017.
However the extremism of the contemporary left seems to be fueling a backlash of extremism on the right. It feels like a recapitulation of post-war Europeanism that led to the Berlin Wall. Come on, people. We can do better than this.
I suppose that the good news is that insanity doesn't prevail. At least not yet, and the rush toward that abyss may be abating or even reversing at last.
Additional confirmation:
Political ideology by state
Hardly...it is the most watched cable news in the US and they really attacked Budweiser. Now they are attacking Target stores. And I thought Twitter was going by the wayside with the younger folks? Your funny, you say I should get into social media, and you told me that on social media. I do get your point, the younger folks aren't watching TV like us older folks. But we have a lot of money to spend.Quote:
Fox News is irrelevant here.
You focused on politics...I'm speaking of society in general. One glaring example is TV. Look how much it has changed since the 50s, 60s, 70, until now. That reflects what is happening in society. It definitely isn't leaning to the right.Quote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
Ok, you're still not understanding. Fox News is reacting to this, they aren't driving it. Twitter is driving this. I mean do you have any idea how much activity there is on Twitter behind these boycotts? You know how many arguments there are on Twitter over this? You know how many memes and videos are getting posted by the hour? Then on top if this you have the hundreds if not thousands of YouTube commentary channels and independent journalist that pick up on this Twitter activity and comment on them to milk views. This alerts segments of their respective audiences who in turn respond by going on Twitter themselves to argue, meme etc so now you have this massive feedback loop that just gets bigger and bigger. Fox News is not relevant here. This has a life of it's own without them doing anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
Every time I go on Twitter and YouTube there is something new. Some video of someone doing something crazy or saying something interesting, some new meme etc. I'm not seeing Fox News anywhere here. Look at this. I just opened my Twitter just now and this is what greets me:-
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/sta...57847452356611
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/statu...65667971387393
https://twitter.com/GrahamAllen_1/st...90984509075458
https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status...58870221361152
https://twitter.com/hodgetwins/statu...44167512498178
https://twitter.com/TexasRepublic71/...42048747167744
I could keep probably keep going for hours posting links. Fox News is irrelevant. I could get endless hours of content on this story just from Twitter alone. We don't need Fox News!
You are the one the just doesn't get it. I'll concede that other outlets may be the main driver of the movement and are more massive but they are definitely NOT "driving Fox". Fox has been driving crap like that for years. CRT, WOKE, and now this.
This kind of thing is their narrative and they were "driving" things like this way before Twitter and all the social media was even massive like it is.
Has it crossed you mind maybe some of the 2.2 million Fox viewers also get on Twitter and propagate what they saw on Fox. And that helps fuel many other posts around the world.
2.2 million? That's laughable. Elon Musk has 140.9 million followers on Twitter. What this means is that if you are I tweet something and by some miracle he retweets it, it shows up in the feeds of all 140.9 million of his followers and then it becomes a story instantly.Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
Now Elon Musk has nothing to do with this, I just used him as an example to show you just how insignificant 2.2 million is. Let's look at the follower counts of people I follow on Twitter, some of which themselves are driving this conversation:-
- Libs of TikTok - 2.2 million followers
- Babylon Bee - 2.6 million followers
- Candace Owens - 3.7 million followers
- Jordan Peterson - 4.2 million followers
- Matt Walsh - 1.9 million followers
Any one of these people tweet or retweet a single thing about this instantly reach millions. 2.2 million people watching Fox News is nothing. Jordan Peterson by himself on Twitter can reach twice that amount of people in an instant.
Here's an interesting thing to note, Fox News also has a Twitter account which boasts 23.8 million followers but when I scroll through their feed, it contains almost nothing about the boycotts. They don't even really care about this. I mean you can see for yourself:-
https://twitter.com/FoxNews
Look, I'm not saying Fox News doesn't have some part to play, but you are vastly over-estimating their influence. They are a drop in an ocean. I mean even with their 23.8 million followers on Twitter, they are still dwarfed by the likes of Elon Musk, Kim Kardashian, Barack Obama etc. They are also dwarfed the by the combined reach of smaller celebrities like those I listed.
I wasn't going to get into this, but the math you just used is clearly faulty. 2.2 million isn't nothing, even by your own examples. It's as much as one that you listed, more than another, almost as much as a third, and then you had to round up to claim that one person had just twice as many. You're trying to make the case that 2.2 million is nothing, and yet you used a series of examples where 2.2 million would certainly NOT be nothing. The argument for Musk would be reasonable, as 2.2 million is a fairly small percentage of 140.9 million, but those other points just don't make the case.
Are you trying to argue that a Twitter follower is somehow a higher value than a TV viewer, and therefore should have a multiplier? If so, I might agree with you, as I don't feel they are equivalent, but I'm not sure that the multiplier is greater or less than 1, so make your case.
I'm not sure which 2.2 million you are referring to but if it was my post what I was thinking is the 2.2 million Fox viewers may also have Twitter accounts. Some of those can have hard to count followers but hypothetically hundreds of thousands posts that turn into other hundreds of thousands posts. So Fox news' influence and narrative are expanded exponentially with untold Twitter accounts making that media, Fox, potent. Versus the "hardly worth mentioning" argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
I understand the point you're making. However, what I am trying to say is that Fox News with their 2.2 million viewers aren't special because there are literally hundreds if not thousands of people on Twitter with that that kind of reach but I only listed a handful just off my own Twitter account. If just 50 of those people catch wind of a story and started re-tweeting, their reach will far exceed those 2.2 million Fox News viewers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
Lets do some math. Lets say some event happened and 50 Twitter users with an average of say, 1.1 million followers took interest in it. 50 x 1.1 = 55 million. Now lets assume some overlap, say 20% of that 55 million is shared between those 50 Twitter users. 20% of 55 million = 11 million. 55 - 11 = 44 million. So these 50 people would be reaching 44 million unique individuals. That's way in excess of 2.2 million viewers on Fox News.
Oh yes very much so but I would not go so far as to say we should apply a multiplier. You think Elon Musk spent 40+ billion dollars for Twitter for his amusement? Twitter is very serious business. I don't think many of you truly realize just how important social media has become. "Old guard" TV news networks like Fox News and CNN are no longer the primary portals to current events. They are too slow, un-interactive and their coverage is too limited. They have no advantage over social media except being able to reach that older audience like all the grandmas and grandpas who haven't caught up with the times.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
I get what you're trying to say but what I am saying, traditional media is way too slow. These things go super viral on social media very very quickly. When something happens and Twitter gets a hold over it, it spreads like wild-fire and by the time traditional media catches on, it already has a life of it's own. If you found about anything through Fox News, I can guarantee, you've arrived late to the party. So those paltry 2.2 million viewers who found out on Fox News and decide to jump on Twitter, are coming behind many times that number who were already in on the action before them.Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonLPrice
This is where you are so wrong and you just don't understand. Their narrative (Fox), their drive, is to find/enhance/and super charge on a 24/7 the very stories that feed the media you think drives them. I just have to disagree if you insist Fox news is hardly worth mentioning when it comes to the Bud Lite boycott.Quote:
If you found about anything through Fox News, I can guarantee, you've arrived late to the party.
The FDA recently granted Neuralink approval for human clinical studies. This was posted by the company on Twitter May 25th, 2023 at 6:10 PM. As of this post that was 20 hours ago:-
https://twitter.com/neuralink/status...57379460468736
It has 25 million views as of now.
If you search for this story in Google you find these:-
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-65717487
That was 4 hours ago, 16 hours late
https://www.reuters.com/science/elon...ts-2023-05-25/
This one was 9 hours ago, 11 hours late.
I tried to find any clips of this being talked about by a major traditional news network, the best I found was this:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXW6OV-qryI
Which as best as I could tell is some backwater branch of CNN and even then they were 16 hours late.
25+ million people have already been made aware of this and I can't find a single piece of evidence that a major news network devoted even single 5 minute segment towards informing the public. By modern standards, this is already old news so even if a major news network picks it up tomorrow, all they would really be doing is picking up a little bit of slack. They far too slow to have the kind of influence you believe they have.
As far as I can tell that's a tentacle of CNN in India, designed to use local broadcasters to reach beyond the big cities where highly subsidized cable TV can be made available for token rates.
It seems odd so little coverage has occurred elsewhere, but that's the tip of the iceberg when it comes to suppressed stories. For example the Congressional hearings on whistleblower persecution and what the whistleblowers revealed about the FBI's illegal January 6th activities gets very slim coverage as well. The Durham Report on the Russiagate hoax gets just as little coverage.
They seem to be back to thumping the drum of Trump Derangement Syndrome again in the west.
Haha don't even get me started on this.Quote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
Yeah, there isn't any point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
Yep!Quote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
https://www.vbforums.com/images/ieimages/2023/05/17.jpg
Target stocks collapsed to it's lowest trading value in a year. This is on Twitter as of 6 hours ago:-
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/sta...97288741650435
It already has 5.6 million views.....Lets just wait for Fox News to arrive late to the party with their paltry 2 million viewers.......
I'd say this whole Fox Vs Social Media is Apples and Oranges.
The average age of a Fox news viewer is 68. That's the demographic that Fox has to entertain. What the 30yr olds on Twitter are talking about doesn't drive Fox. Social media is a different demographic.
Yea, kinda my point. You're right in that Fox isn't really concerned with "30yr olds on Twitter" however, with regards to the boycott, it just so happens that both Fox's demographic and the "30yr olds on Twitter" are caught up in it but only one of these demographics is actually driving this particular narrative and it's not Fox's demographic.Quote:
Originally Posted by wes4dbt
I'm just trying to figure out who all of these hard drinking 68 year olds are. Most people that age who I know can make a 6-pack last months if they buy one at all.
lol :lol:
Well, a six pack certainly doesn't last long at my house but i don't watch Fox news so I guess it doesn't count. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by dilettante
Yeah, I do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya