Yeah I don't believe you. You're Marvin.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Printable View
Yeah I don't believe you. You're Marvin.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
How close exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Oh my....you lovebirds go on and on don't ya ;)
But MOM!!! He started it!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
It doesn't matter who started it!!!....you're both grounded for a month....NOW go to your rooms don't let me hear a peep outta you guys for the rest of the night!!! Remember mommy loves you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spetnik
Ew that's taking it too far. Just gross.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
What gutter is your mind in :eek:
No gutter. She had aidsQuote:
Originally Posted by Niya
Oh God...somebody shoot me lol
??? What ???
SHOOT ME!! :eek2:
Bang!!!
Oh God....You shot me!!! :sick:
Oh Brother!!
Niya is your brother?!
I wish...
He is Marvin in a deed.
Can we please stop and then get back to the OP???
I think at this point we're post-OP. Which probably means there is no going back.
I thought you had covered the OP pretty well, and were on to other things.
This is how I remember it: We never covered the OP in the first place...
Also, she had A.I.D.S.
Ok, my point can best be summed up by referring you to your post #6 on the first page of this massive thing. As early as that post you were already talking about future versions that you were working on, which meant that you had pretty much abandoned the true OP yourself in very short order. Once the OP moves away from the OP, then OP need feel no obligation to comment on the OP that the OP is no longer OPining on.
To understand that last sentence, please see the acronym key:
1) OP: Original Poster, which is the person who wrote the post that started the thread.
2) OP: Original Point or Original Post, which is often, though not always, covered in the initial post of a thread.
3) OP: Other Posters, all posters in a thread who are not the original poster. In other words every P other than the OP is an OP of the third type.
What that is popersous, in deed it must be because it made no sense as to what this thread WAS about...
You just gave me a headache :sick:......you owe me asprin ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
lol...
This forum is for English speakers. Your post was not in English. Please leave. In deed. She had aids.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Actually it was in English, and then I am Australian, which is an English speaking Nation...
"popersous" is not a word. "in deed" is meaningless. The rest of your "sentence" was barely comprehensible. And you are Nigerian, remember? I know Australians, they don't talk like you. They speak English.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
What does popersous mean? I can't figure out what your reply meant since you spelled that word so badly that I have no idea what word it was supposed to have been. The closest word to that is probably "prosperous", but that doesn't make the sentence meaningful in any way. A better word might be preposterous, but that isn't even vaguely similar to what you actually wrote.
That is an old English word that means nosense or rubbish. If you were of English speaking bacground, you would have known that...
Oh, are you speaking Old English? In that case:Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
þisses dómern sy for Cniht Englisc ángilde. Cwæ awegcuman.
I did know that once, but not now. I have forgotten what it means...
You don't speak Modern English and you don't speak Old English. So you don't speak English.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Also, I just checked several Old English dictionaries. "popersous" is not a word. So you obviously do not speak English. nuff said
I seriously doubt that. However, the definition you gave is pretty much the definition for the word "Preposterous", which is the second alternative I considered for what you had written.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
I've heard of people being hooked on phonics, but you appear to have OD'd on phonics.
Look at my website then, and you shall find out so: Click Here...
What's an "Internet URL Page"? Yeah... you don't speak EnglishQuote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Go seek and you shall find...
Yeah, you don't speak English
Have you gone and surfed my webpage, yet???
Yes, it is terrible. Just like your English.
I was the sole programmer of that webpage, and it is a wonderful tool to have under your belt as a computer programmer...
But you don't speak English
As I have said before, I speak, write and also read English and that is my first choice of language...
And as I have pointed out many times, you have shown quite clearly that you do not speak English. You use made-up words, such as "popersous" or "extremedities". You are obviously not a native English speaker and it is quite pathetic how you think anyone believes that you are.
Fine, I cannot change your thoughts on me, then I shall not do so then...
Great. We're in agreement (your double-"then" withstanding).
Now (seeing as I am the owner of this thread), let's get back to my original question: About the Time Machine that I am Making in VB.Net for Microsoft
I am having trouble designing the counter-paradox library, as the input thread melts whenever I attempt non-parallel 4th dimensional transport. When simultaneous transport is attempted in more than one dimension the effect is reduced somewhat, but serious damage still occurs to the perpendicular circuitry and the spontaneous genetic mutations are quite frightening.
She had aids.
None of the links on your page work. I noticed it says "Also this Webpage is best viewed inside the Internet Browsers, Windows Internet Explorer or our Internet Browser product: QuickBrowser...", can the problem be that I'm viewing it on the waffle iron?Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
I would have thought that would be an improvement. Try meatloaf.Quote:
Originally Posted by baja_yu
I'm still working on most of the pages of the Webpage. However the Products Section, really works but you cannot donate money to me only Download normally...
So many people will be disappointed... I think you should pay us retribution for being unable to donate.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Now, back to the real topic of this thread:
About the Time Machine that I am Making in VB.Net for Microsoft
I am having trouble designing the counter-paradox library, as the input thread melts whenever I attempt non-parallel 4th dimensional transport. When simultaneous transport is attempted in more than one dimension the effect is reduced somewhat, but serious damage still occurs to the perpendicular circuitry and the spontaneous genetic mutations are quite frightening.
All of your applications automatically donate to you once they have been downloaded?
Someone actually tried that here once. You can still find the old threads if you look hard enough. They make quite an amusing read.Quote:
All of your applications automatically donate to you once they have been downloaded?
@ThELiMp - I read through your web page ages ago out of curiosity and it made no more sense to me than this thread.
Have you tried indexing it using the duo-decriment system? The increased performancy might over-inflate the endorphin juxtopositions leading to a cromulent wave tectonic ship.Quote:
I am having trouble designing the counter-paradox library
Never mind, I think I fixed it. I had just spelled a variable wrong. It seems to be working now.
On another note:
Attachment 96341
^That's ThEiMp. He can't possibly be from Australia, because they don't allow mustaches there.
Also, for more entertainment, be sure to read his posts + comments on his Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/richard.ambra?fref=ts
Sheds some light on his "wife" "Emma".
HT baja_yu!
There's also a Twitter link on his webpage, at the bottom, in the scrolling marquee (which I haven't seen on a website in over 10 years).
Not on the guys, certainly. The Sheilas... that's a different matter.Quote:
He can't possibly be from Australia, because they don't allow mustaches there.
Looks South African to me.
Back to the OP though, if you get the time machine working in VB .net for Microsoft, you might be able to go back far enough so that she never even had AIDS.
At least there are no dolls present.
If you go in the right deed you might find some, in deed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
That actually kind of made sense to me, I think I'm losing it....