Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
DyslexiaQuote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
DyslexiaQuote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Thanks for the Input$, I have it so bad that I cannot really spell all that well, even though I speak it really well...
Not sure why you referenced my post. "Dyslexic" isn't the same as "Unwilling to Listen"
The reference to your post is just because for me that's the best description for this repeated behavior and (for me) there is a relation with "the link", notorious on writing and reading, all this many times comes with a package that includes many other things, also related to partial understanding in some cases or a complete impossibility to understand in some other cases, like this "game on.." so common on Chit-Chat. In my opinion, this disconnection with reality, blindness, even not being able to see almost all files attached have cero downloads, well for me all this parallel reality is related to the same thing, it's just my impression, I really wanted to leave this explanation implicit in my previous post without adding words but failed to do it.
So what I am gaining from your last post, you mean that you don't believe in reality as being key???
"I reject your reality and substitute my own." - Adam Savage
-tg
Yes, I think he was saying he believes that he is living in a different reality. Possibly one where VB 6 is still massively used and accepted.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Well you see that Macromedia Director, was able to be working with the Visual C++ 5.00 for Windows and then that was able to work even on a PowerPC MAC, without anykind of delay in processing, etc. Which is the norm, when working on cross platform type of applications. However when you was using the Lingo Code, which is the internal coding system at the time. Which is then still being used, however it is always being upgraded, etc you could then use the code to the interpretered into C++ Source Code, but you could never see the C++ Source Code. But then who would want to see that because you were thinking that you were using Lingo code, but you were in a way only using Text data, that was then written in C++ code...
This type of process, went out the door, when that came apparent that, that couldn't and then shouldn't work, as such and the like. You know that it now is totally redudenant that about reworking source code into something more that what it is, in one application. However there isn't any other way to do this work, that I am doing. Because of the fact of the matter, still stands that you really have to use something like Binary or even SQL to create a self sufficient programming language, but then who is just going to do that for just one application. Also I can now tell you that, I am not going to do that, for just one application...
Also: Like all of the Windows platform programming gurus, I am waiting for the next incarnation of the Visual Basic programming language, to take effect in the # arena!!
That's more than I got from it.Quote:
So what I am gaining from your last post, you mean that you don't believe in reality as being key???
If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary-wise; what it is it wouldn't be, and what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?
Not sure what the new world is going on here, but then hey it's just life, in deed!! Also I am glad you're not in charge of making the new reality, in which is just around that corner!!
Anyway I am now releasing in a few days, the new MSDN Library for my application. It will then be able to feature the functions that exist for the following applications that I have been able to write for public businesses or even other types of corporations, etc that wish to use my programming language that I am writing, at this very point in time. The two applications, will then be: QuickDirector, which has more support to the fact of the matter and then there is the application, which is then called: QuickBrowser. Which has only limited support, in the fact that I am still building the MSDN Library for the application. However I have to cover all of my bases, to the extent that coninsides with the release of the application to the public enterprise sections, of businesses of the world, at large!!
Oh god you guys are giving me a brain aneurysm :eek2:
More like a brain meltdown, in this case. (LOL, My memory chips are on fire!!)
Just kidding!!
Here it is, right about now!!
Please look further into this Thread, cause there is the newer versions popping up, all the time. Please remember this isn't a trolling Thread, and then I am taking steps to not make it one. But seeing that there is a lot of data coming in from multipul sources, then that makes my task here, very even more so difficult, in deed!!
Are you 100% sure of this? It seems like it is more a long the lines of a "food for troll" thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
You could probably stop me with a Lewis Gun. Or just join in and sing a Caroll.Quote:
Also I am glad you're not in charge of making the new reality
Well in all in all. Some good person downloaded by MSDN Console, that was a good thing to do. But then they haven't gotten back to me with the result of their views on the products that I am making. I then really hope that they do so, because it will then be good input into the views of the end-user typed person that I am working to please and then at the end of the day, that is the person that is going to keep using my products...
So sorry that I make a bad comment, but then I was only trying to make a statement becuase of what you had posted. But seeing that this is in the chit chat section of the Forum, then that means that well you know the rest...Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
No need to be sorry. My new world will be a veritable Wonderland. Mind you, I Alice get carried away.
I just awoke from a data bandwith over flow and then discovered that I didn't even breathe for the time between the objects: 32,xyz and then 76,xyz on my Virus Scanner!! What is the world going to, and then that is something like tweleve minutes, tops!!
hehe, that sounds like a really wacky new world reality thing, going on at your workplace!!Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
Well, this is certainly going down the rabbit hole, yet I find it oddly familiar. Very very familiar. Is this Battle Programming 5.0 (or whatever version it is up to)?
I'm the one who downloaded it out of curiosity. You put a lot of work into it and I admire that. Maybe it has to do with your dyslexia, but a lot of what you wrote didn't make any sense to me at all, sorry. Or maybe it's just me who doesn't really understand what you're trying to make/achieve.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
There are a few forms as well, but I've sold my copy of VB6 two years ago when I moved on to VB.NET and C#, so I won't be able to open them.
I've also downloaded your browser a few days ago and on page #5 of this thread you claim that it has a special "rendering engine" written for you. But when I opened the 'frmBrowser.frm' file with Notepad it had Object = .......; "ieframe.dll" on the third line, which means you're simply referencing "Microsoft Internet Controls". In other words, you're using the standard WebBrowser control based on Internet Explorer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Yes, but there are other features that I didn't place in the Project Files. You have to see the proper built EXE File, instead of the Project Files. Because I cannot and then will not add everything to the posted project files. If that doesn't makes an sense, then please ask me for more information...
What's your first language? I mean not the language you are writing, but as in human languages. Because it seems to me all the serious advice and the mockery are failing.
.
Australian, Engish...
Figures. Had it even been Australian English, you stood a chance. That comma has sealed the fate.
.
Whoops I spelt: English wrong...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
You are some sort of processor, I knew it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
OMFG. I never say that, but it deserves an OMFG and a ROFL. Maybe even a MAO!Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
That has go to be the most hilarious thing I've read all week, but we'll see what the rest of the week brings. Definitely a top 10. Of course, context counts: it's all in the context.
It could be the dyslexia, my friend has it and he can speak perfect english, but when it comes to writing or texting.... not so much.Quote:
Originally Posted by honeybee
Thanks, I think...
It wasn't much about being able to express oneself through writing or speaking, but more about understanding what was going on here. I would hate to see someone wasting his time on something he thought was being encouraged when actually it wasn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Then again, I might not!
.
I know that I am not wasting my time, here on this Project. Because people are able to learn from it, as such from the Forum members, as for example...
In this day and age.
OK that proves that your Australian is good enough for you to understand the general sentiment here, and I must salute you for the resolute manner in which you tirelessly publish stuff about the new language or interpreter or whatever else you are creating in a historical (read: outdated and soon to be forgotten) language.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
.
Well I can rewrite it to be written from another type of programming language, such as C#...
Not many people are willing to use VB6 code in combination with C#. Everything you can do with VB6 you can also do with C# and a lot more. It's like putting a steam engine in a Porsche. It'll probably work, but there's no reason why you should do it.
-- Hehe ,, Yes but a Steam Engine has about eight hundred times more horsepower than a Porsche. So then that makes it a good idea to invest time and money, which I am doing to work on this Project of mine...
Only if Porsche is the name of a Steam Boat...Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
which is what this whole thread represents both metaphorically and Allegorically...
With whatever respect I can muster for your work, and this is probably my most serious post on this thread, why do you still want to work with VB6?
By the time you are done, there won't be anyone who 'can' run your code and give you any feedback. The world will have moved on to VS2011 or maybe F#.
Switching to dotnet, you at least stand some chance, even though you may be only doing it to please yourself.
.
I still want to work with Visual Basic, because of the fact that it is able to do what I want it to do. Also I know how to use it, I must go back to University to learn C#, or then as someone has been able to say that now there is: F#, now...
You do know that there are books out there on C# and all other programming languages that you can read to learn, right? Also, just because F comes after C doesn't mean that F# is something new to replace C#. It's a completely different ball game, a language geared towards the functional programming paradigm.
Agreed. You really don't need to go back to university to learn .Net or C#. VBForums is among the best learning routes available for these languages... and it's completely free! Of course, you have to want to learn.
Oh really, that's really good. To hear that people are willing to help each other even in the programming field of information technology...
I think that I need a personal or business loan to purchase this type of software, agreed???
Well I am no hack, if that means a software pirate, but then I am not sure what that means in this context???
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Quote:
Originally Posted by baja_yu
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
Please tell me you haven't been sitting in a cave with a Pentium MMX machine connected only to VB Forums! Microsoft has been releasing Express editions of the Visual Studio, so you can pick any Express version of the programming language of your choice. Have you been hibernating all these years?Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
And you don't even need books to learn anything. Nowadays that job is handled by Google. I sometimes fear that if Google were to go out of business (now that's a very distant possibility) or if our internet connection were to go down (nearer than the earlier one), today's programmers won't be able to solve many of the programming issues they face everyday. They are so much used to Google, they can't survive without it.
So if you have an internet connection you can not only download one of (or all of) the free Express editions of Visual Studio .Net but also browse enough sites to write a book about it yourself. Just make sure it's more focussed than Battle Programming.
.
Well guess what I went for a Personal Loan, and then was able to go for a personal load for the special $5000(AUD), that I needed to purchase: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET 2010 and then was able to then install it on my Penitum IV, which isn't a Pentium MMX for that matter. If you were wanting to know that, for instance...
PS: Having problems with the Source Code, converter as per say that it isn't allowing me to convert my VB6 COM Source Code Project Files, then that means that it totally sucks, chockers because it isn't allowing me to do this, as what the other programmers have been able to do so in the pervious versions of the products. That I have been told before, hand...
I'm beginning to think that this is Yotamarker talking.
Is Moti back?Quote:
Originally Posted by baja_yu
Seriously?! After we told you that it was free you still went and paid for it?! Why?! Why would you do that?! There aren't enough exclamation marks in the world to fully express my exasperation.Quote:
Well guess what I went for a Personal Loan, and then was able to go for a personal load for the special $5000(AUD), that I needed to purchase: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET 2010
Here's the same reply I gave to you in your other thread:Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp
Microsoft has officially ended support for VB6 4 years ago (April 8, 2008).
You had almost 10 years to switch to .NET and now your are complaining that the VB6 to VB.NET converter doesn't exist anymore in VS2010? Well, boohoo... :rolleyes:
Even if you could convert a VB6 project to VB.NET with VS2010.... both are two different languages and only the most basic "Hello World!" type of projects can be converted correctly. Any medium size project will generate hundreds of errors and warnings that need to be fixed. Fixing them takes often a lot more time than rewriting everything from scratch.
You can try the commercial VBto Converter, but I'm sure you'll come back here whining that it didn't convert your project properly... :rolleyes:
Why did you buy VS2010? There is a free Express version that can do 98% of what the commercial version of VS2010 can do, which was already explained to you in your troll thread in the Chit/Chat forum.
I'll also add what I put in the other thread (but only because I want to stay relevant): You would be so totally dissapointed with the converter that you are better off without it. You may be frustrated by it not being there, but that is nothing when compared to the frustration you would have felt if it HAD been there. The thing sucked. Nobody ever recommended using it for anything other than the most trivial projects, and your project isn't even close to being that trivial.
So, where does that leave you: It leaves you with less work to do, because you re-write. The reason it is less work is that the converter made such a mess out of your code that you would spend at least as much time fixing the mess, yet you would feel compelled to do so because it had done so much work that looked valuable.
What you will find out is that re-writing isn't as bad as it sounds. The forms are considerably different in .NET, but most of that is hidden from you, as it was in VB6. The event handlers look similar, and you can copy code from the old to the new. I found that re-writing a significant VB6 project took only a tiny fraction of the time that writing from scratch took, because I was a ble to copy in functions and function bodies, then turn them into working code with minimal changes.
It isn't as bad as you might fear, and is probably better than the converter would have done.
So wait, you just bought Visual Studio 2010 (professional I'm assuming?) to write an IDE/Compiler/Whatever for VB 6? I still don't even know what you're trying to accomplish, I don't see how 2 different contexts of english can have such a language barrier.
Well it's an IDE, however I scratch wrote an app, which is called: CodePad, which is the one that features only the CodeBox section of the Visual Suite's QuickDirector IDE. But then yes, I had bought the professional version of the Visual Studio 2010 edition. Also it runs pretty slow on my machine, seeing that there are so many of my projects are on it, and then they are also working in the background of the system, nearly everytime I get on the Net to do work, etc...
Looks like you need a new machine too! I am willing to sell you for this one time offer, my Asus G74sx 12gb of JESUSLIKE RAM, i7 HOLYDEATHMACHINE processor, and 2x 500gb hardrives, all for this one-time low price of $2000 + shipping.
Comes with a free version of Visual Studio C#/C++ Express, real nice.
Doesn't the Express version have an expiriy date process found inside it??? If so then I don't want to even download it from a pirate website!!
PS: I have purchased the edition of Visual Studio Professional 2010, but then found that it totally sucks chockers, because of the failed attempt to win myself and then the other countless millions of computer programmers around the world. So then I am going to wait until there is a patch to fix this problem, or even on the other hand I am going to ask Microsoft to rectify this problem of ours, in the Morning. Because of the time slip here, I'm not going to do so at midnight in Perth, WA!!
Express is 100% free from Microsoft.
Just a quick digression. Are you by any chance using Google to translate what you are writing in some other language? If not, then this must be Moti's Yotamarker, no human can write like this.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThEiMp