It's not just Opera ... they come up blank in IE & FF too. In fact, they are blank 90% of the time (if not more) for me. I'm sure the advertisers (who are paying top dollar no doubt) would be thrilled to know that...
Printable View
I think that is most likely limited to your case. I've only seen them blank and Opera so far. At least consistently.
Anyone experiencing an issue with chrome?
Why is the inside of the advertisement box taking so much time to load? Also CPU usage jumps to more than 15% during this time.
I'm using:
IE6.0 SP3
Windows XP Professional SP3
3.40GHz Dual Core CPU
4GB RAM (3.6GB effectively)
Attachment 78067
Sorry for being lazy and not reading the entire thread to see if someone mentioned this before, but is it possible to put just a tiny time delay on the keyword ads, so they don't pop up if I just move the mouse over it by chance? Some threads have a lot of them and it's beginning to be a pain. Something like 1/3 of a second would probably do just fine.
Hi Admins,
There seems to be a new "feature" on VBForums. When certain "keywords" appear in posts (like application, program, etc..) and you happen to pass your mouse over them, a popup from Internet.com appears with a "relevant" link :sick: I interpret this as "This company paid Internet.com to show you their link when this keyword is used". :D
Is this happening only to me? Is there any way to get rid of this? PLEASE?!
Thanks.
-EM
WOOOPS! Sorry. Shoulda known somebody would have complained already. :D
I've been away from VBF for a while and lately have only stuck around the VB6 and Office Development forums, so I didn't see this Forum Feedback thread.
Thanks for the boot... mmm, I mean, nudge in the right direction. :bigyello:
-EM
THe load time of the insides is something being addressed. I agree it is way too slow and should be near instant. I've been told it is being addressed.
As to 15% CPU usage... I see more of a bump in my CPU usage when I sneeze ;) :D Seriously, I'm not sure I see that small bump as an issue as that is way less than what some flash running on a page would do. If people disagree with me... well, if they do, I'm sure I'll get the PMs or the responses in this thread :)
Brad!
Yes. I know it seems sarcastic to raise an issue of CPU usage in such situations, when there are web elements (like flash etc.) that eat a much greater amount of CPU. But shouldn't we keep this in mind that we are here loading just a 10KB image file which is no comparison those heavy elements we are comparing it to? :)
Actually, there is a lot more going on than just loading a 10k image. There is logic being executed to look at the current page and determine what words to underline. The page is then being adjusted to do that underlining and to associate the appropriate ads. After all that, the image you indicated is loaded. Overall, there is some real calculation and processing happening.
If we monopolized the CPU doing this, then I agree that we'd need to further tweak the code to lighten in up. If we are taking only 15% of the CPU,then I (personally) think it makes more sense to be focusing on speeding up the code rather than lightening its CPU load.
Regardless, we are letting the tech team know all the issues that are being raised here. We are taking each one seriously.
Brad!
Thanks :thumb: