Quote:
Originally posted by kedaman
hehe.. there are loads of applications of templates.. if you just look around on the net, one thing though, you're probably getting information overload.. so if you don't want that you could always ask me ;)
Yeah I will...going to use some templates soon...I can feel it..:D....thanks...I know where to find you....have to go now. My GF is shaking me here...:D
*touches note (to disclaim that he doesn't hate him)*Quote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
Don't touch me....;)
BTW in that same page as the code I posted a link to he sais this:
What does he mean by binarys....he can't mean the cpp files, does he?
Binaries are executables
Hehe....of cousre....I was pretty sure he didn't mean the cpp files. But that is what you usually say. Compile the cpp files...:D...not compile the EXE files..:D...and when I understood that he didn't mean that I was starting to think abou the media files...but then again...how the hell do you compile a media file..:D
yeah thats right, i used to do both at the same time a couple of years ago, then i interruped myself hitting on the NP-problem, and then i got really mad at stuff and quit programming for a long time. So if i'm ever going to continue i'm going to work out the theory (which is the language itself) the implementation, that is the compiler, can wait. The compiler doesn't have to be platform dependent, i can do with partial compiling to a portable and well optimized language like C or C++Quote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
I don't understand this about making a langauge....if you make a language, isn't that just theory, and then you have to make a conpiler to make it run on a platform? Isn't that the implementation...are you just doing the theory part?
hehe.. i'm competing with your GF now :DQuote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
Yeah I will...going to use some templates soon...I can feel it..:D....thanks...I know where to find you....have to go now. My GF is shaking me here...:D
hehe lolQuote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
Hehe....of cousre....I was pretty sure he didn't mean the cpp files. But that is what you usually say. Compile the cpp files...:D...not compile the EXE files..:D...and when I understood that he didn't mean that I was starting to think abou the media files...but then again...how the hell do you compile a media file..:D
Quote:
Originally posted by kedaman
hehe.. i'm competing with your GF now :D
Yeah, and if I wasn't sutch a weak person you would have won..:d
Can't you make a compiler that compiles to native code, but has the exact same syntax and implementation in all OSes....like C/C++ should have had a thousend years ago?Quote:
Originally posted by kedaman
yeah thats right, i used to do both at the same time a couple of years ago, then i interruped myself hitting on the NP-problem, and then i got really mad at stuff and quit programming for a long time. So if i'm ever going to continue i'm going to work out the theory (which is the language itself) the implementation, that is the compiler, can wait. The compiler doesn't have to be platform dependent, i can do with partial compiling to a portable and well optimized language like C or C++
yeah sure, but thats a lot of unnecessarily painful work if you ask me. Thank god for partial compiling.Quote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
Can't you make a compiler that compiles to native code, but has the exact same syntax and implementation in all OSes....like C/C++ should have had a thousend years ago?
Partial compiling, is that the same as Java does when it compiles to Java Byte code? Or am I way off here....or is it more like the P code that VB used to compile to, the kind of code that was compiled when you first ran the app...
Or is it like JIT?
yeah those are partial compilations and java byte code is then interpreted, full compilation is always down to machine code, so you could compile partially like this Squirrel -> C -> machine code using a C compiler and a Squirrel2C partial compiler. Usually you start writing compilers like this until you bootstrap them and compile them in themselves.Quote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
Partial compiling, is that the same as Java does when it compiles to Java Byte code? Or am I way off here....or is it more like the P code that VB used to compile to, the kind of code that was compiled when you first ran the app...
dunno much about JIT, but i think thats compilation to native codeQuote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
Or is it like JIT?
Quote:
Originally posted by kedaman
dunno much about JIT, but i think thats compilation to native code
If I have understood JIT correct, it's like when you compile it, you don't compile it to native code at once. But first time it is runed it will compile on the machine you are using.
So the first time you use it, it will not be as fast as the rest of the times...;)
Quote:
Originally posted by kedaman
yeah those are partial compilations and java byte code is then interpreted, full compilation is always down to machine code, so you could compile partially like this Squirrel -> C -> machine code using a C compiler and a Squirrel2C partial compiler. Usually you start writing compilers like this until you bootstrap them and compile them in themselves.
So I wasn't that far away..:D...thanks for the explenations..:D
NPs, I know you live in norway so its not that far away ;)Quote:
Originally posted by NoteMe
So I wasn't that far away..:D...thanks for the explenations..:D
You stupid fool...:DQuote:
Originally posted by kedaman
NPs, I know you live in norway so its not that far away ;)
BTW I found this compiler. Made by game developers, for making games. Looks pretty nice to use. Fast as hell. If you look at the benchmark link to the right you will understand what I mean.....;)
ah really what compiler is it? what do you mean by fast as hell.. that it compiles fast or makes fast games ;)
I have no idae on how to make compilers, but say they have used some vector thingy to compile the code. THe code EXECUTES fast as hell...;)....you can use it as a "plug in" in VB6 and I guess .NET, and you can use that compiler to compile everything or just some files in the final application...pretty nice...
vector<thingy>? :D
so have you got a link or anything?
Did I forget to post the link...:D...I feel so dumb..:D
http://www.codeplay.com/vectorc/index_pc.html
Here you go...now you can look at the benchmark link to the right...;)
ah.. so its really just for speeding up vector graphics.. well thats cool
Maybe....:D...what do I know...:D....but it is faster on integer arrays and quicksort and a lot of other things that isn't that close related to vector graphics...
hehe yeah well its related a bit thoguh because they are sort of vectors too ;)
Yeah they are. Thats why I said THAT CLOSE related...;)
But I get you idea. But as long as it improves speed for games I am happy...at least if it didn't cost that much..:D..way to much money for me at the moment. Unless I was supposed to earn money from the compiled code that is....
hehe yeah.. money is the root of all evil, they should make a free compiler instead ;)
Yeah they should. Or MS should buy them up, and add it as a plug in for VC++...;)
nah, if they buy it no good will come of it ;)
If MS give them a **** load of money, maybe they can use more time to get it even better...;)
I think giving someone **** load of money will get them to think of the $$$$ instead of the customers ;)
Not if you find the right person....but in our world I guess you are right. Most persons seems to care more about the money then what they do for the world....
yeah, so in other words if you want to do something, you should do it for non profit ;)
No, you should do it so you have enough money to support your self, and then work 16 hours days, and forget about ssetteling down and get a girl and kids...
so why should you forge3t about getting a girl and kids when you once where a kid? ;)
That was a irrasjonal question...and I refuse to answer it...;)...that has nothing to do with my point....if you want to screw your life...then fine...but don't screw others life telling them to use functional programming...;)
sure thing note ;) Maybe you don't want to answer that question to me but you have to answer it once yourself anyway ;)
I don't want to have kids...finished...