Attachment 138507
Printable View
I often wonder about that myself.
up cho thá»›t bay lên tháº*t cao nè
.................................................................................................... ......................................................
-link removed-
Lol worst place for spam.
I wonder if that was the first spam to hit this thread - I'm not sure I recall it happening before.
Or do those bot-spammers hit all the latest threads?
Most of them just scatter gun a whole bunch of threads and we usually just do a blanket delete. It's kinda funny that DD left that one in place though. It fits right in to the weird stream of consciousness that is the Post Race.
There were actually 3 posts written by dongtay1001 that were left live.... Now there is just the one above in this thread. :)
With a ban in place, that ID won't be posting here again, so someone will have to cover race posts for him/her/it. :)
I was on my cell phone when I removed the link and said "Oh when I get home I'll ban him/her/it" but when I got home... I forgot :blush:
That's okay, it provided a nice distraction from the 'standard' post race posts..... ;) :)
Never could see where the name for Cheerios came from.
Nothing cheery about it.
Sad lumps of soggy dough with round eyes staring back at you.
Back to the standard post race posts...
Oh!! Good point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruff
Cheers!
Brad!
In polite society we don't call them Cheerios. We call them Toodle-Pips.
Cold breakfast cereal is always tricky.
Optimal soaking time is everything.
Too dry and you lacerate your gums. Too wet... Blech!
Toodle Pips. Sounds like something your poodle leaves behind.
No, it wasn't...at least I don't think it was. Those binary posts were right up there.Quote:
Originally Posted by szlamany
I was curious about how Target's stock is doing considering I see a lot of negativity surrounding the company through Facebook since their policy clarification on bathroom use and transgenders.
On April 19th, which is when they announced the clarification of the policy, their stock closed at $83.29. As of right now the stock is $67.93, this represents a drop of %18.44 in the matter of only 52 days.
I really don't have an opinion on the policy itself, but as a businessman this tells me that Target needs to be doing some kind of brand rebuilding because they're losing it... and fast!
Don't get me wrong, a $67.93 stock price is a solid stock, however if it continues to trend downward its investors are likely to pull out.
Would you say that put a target on them?Quote:
Originally Posted by dday9
Target has had a mix of issues, lately. There was that credit card breach which HAMMERED them a year ago, then just recently they launched some initiative regarding the food side of their business and some other moves on the retain side. I don't even know what policy you are talking about, yet I've seen articles in the Economist that would suggest that Target is trying to change course in some retail areas, which is enough to cause a stock drop without any other issues.
Therefore, I'm not sure whether you can attribute the stock flux to any single cause. They have a few of them going on, at the moment.
I wouldn't take the credit card breach into consideration as the drop associated with it had already occurred and they were on the rebound which was largely pushed by their food initiative.