Quote:
Originally posted by CiberTHuG
Okay, let's look at this logically. And first, I want you to realize, unlike Kedaman, that logic is a universal set of self-evident rules. They are not something invented by man.
The bible is a book. This book claims that a god exists. If this god exists does this mean that what is written in all books is true? Obviously not, so we can't hold the text of any book as being sole proof. We need something more.
Jesus of Nazereth. Yes, he existed, and he claims there is a god. If this god exists does this mean that all men who claim their father is god or some such are speaking the truth? Obviously not, after all, the followers of Jesus claim that Budda was mistaken, and the follows of Budda claim that Jesus was exagerating. Oh, then there is Charles Manson and Joan d'Arc. We need something more.
Okay, he has touched your life in some spiritual matter, one that has left no physical evidence. Well, there is this carpet cleaner that has touched my life, and I think everyone should buy and use my carpet cleaner. Obviously again, you aren't going to believe the mouth of he who is trying to sell something. We need something more.
Vein is a line, or a course of something: a blood vein, a quartz vein. Vain is self interest, vanity.
Why did your god make man?
There is no perceivable reason, so I have to wonder why a god would make a man without good reason. Which inturn makes me think that perhaps there really isn't a god.
But if there is, the only reason revealed to us (and thus the only reason that is a basis for worshipping him) is to love him. He made man in his own image so that we may know him. That is conceit and vanity. He didn't make us to do the right thing (to fight evil), he didn't make us so he could take joy in watching us grow (as a parent would), he didn't make us so he could share the universe with him (as a parent would), and he didn't make us so we would outlive him (as any life strives to do). He made us for the sole purpose of laying down at his feet and worshipping.
I could be wrong, but no one has put forth any plausible cause.
As to using the sublime elegance of the universe as evidence of the hand of a creator, well...
the universe wouldn't work with out its intracicies, which means that we wouldn't be here to appreciate it. So you aren't saying "it's so good has to be created", you are saying "it is created". You have no basis for comparision. Perhaps our universe is not as elegant as it could be.
In any case, the existance of a creation does not indicate the existance of a creator.
you talk to much