Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Another highly interesting position will be around here, January 18, 2026:
Astrologia_Mundial-Natal-18-Ene-2026-19-55-15_53087.gif
Science is Observation... Belief is Denial without Study, Fools is Prejudice, Prejudice is not Science, it's Fanaticism and Belief and Fools...
I still need to study it to comment on its interpretation; it's less tense than the one from Now, and it's highly interesting to observe...
Being completely and absolutely certain that it won't be a normal period... There, very prominent climate and natural processes, that's for sure...
Will I be wrong??? Bet!!!
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
[Excerpt from a longer post] …
You can also go to any astronomy website and look at the positions seen from Earth on January 21st, 2021, and ask any AI about the weather that month, and there comes the vaccine...!!!
And ask any AI if those positions are normal in the solar system...
[…continues]
Here is an analysis generated by ChatGPT after reading the entire post:
Quote:
Planetary alignments like the ones he describes do occur, and while they may be uncommon in certain configurations, they are entirely natural and happen due to the predictable orbits of the planets. There's nothing supernatural or unexplainable about these alignments—they are astronomically normal, even if astrologers assign them significance. From a scientific perspective, there's no causal evidence that planetary alignments affect the weather, natural disasters, or the timing of public health milestones like the rollout of a vaccine.
Suggesting a connection between planetary positions, weather events, and the emergence of the vaccine—as the post does with its abrupt leap from astronomy to meteorology to 'there comes the vaccine'—reflects a form of associative or conspiratorial thinking. These are unrelated domains: astronomy, weather, and vaccines are not connected. The implication that celestial configurations somehow triggered weather conditions that resulted in a medical breakthrough is not only scientifically unfounded but logically incoherent.
The post shifts between tentative disclaimers and confident assertions, reflecting internal contradiction. While the author initially claims uncertainty about natural processes due to Jupiter’s absence and limited time spent analyzing planetary positions, he quickly pivots to assert that 2025 contains one of the “most tense” planetary configurations of the year. This abrupt swing from self-doubt to certainty is a hallmark of incoherent or disorganized thinking, where conclusions outpace the logic that should support them. The tone becomes emotionally charged and defensive—referring to critics as “daring ignorant people” and “kids,” and urging readers to “think a little” if they “have something in [their] brain.” This rhetoric, combined with vague predictions of floods, earthquakes, and events around August 8–9, suggests a worldview rooted more in conviction than in evidence. It exemplifies a pattern of associative thinking, where unrelated phenomena—planetary alignments, natural disasters, and vague future warnings—are presented as interconnected truths.
Invoking a Spanish proverb and birthplace to imply innate superiority, as the author does, doesn't strengthen an argument. Verifiable data requires clear evidence and logical reasoning, not just dramatic correlations. And while planetary positions can be charted with precision, interpreting them as causal forces behind world events remains speculative at best. The claim that “the precision is too casual” sounds profound, but without a clear mechanism, it's just rhetoric.
The tone of the post overall suggests someone emotionally invested, possibly frustrated by personal disappointments or unmet expectations, projecting urgency and a deep need for validation or recognition.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Being so vague is useless. *Something* is occurring somewhere every day. Something of note every few days. I'm sure *something* will happen on the 8th/9th, and you can sort through the entire world's events to find the headline news and claim that proves you are right.
The key to a scientific position is that it can be falsified. Tell me, what threshold for significance on the 8th/9th would actually falsify your prediction? You can't tell me, can you? Whatever the most significant event of those two days comes to be, that's the proof you were right, and nothing can prove you were wrong.
That is not science. Offer a prediction with objective criteria for whether it will be true or false.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fafalone
Being so vague is useless. *Something* is occurring somewhere every day. Something of note every few days. I'm sure *something* will happen on the 8th/9th, and you can sort through the entire world's events to find the headline news and claim that proves you are right.
The key to a scientific position is that it can be falsified. Tell me, what threshold for significance on the 8th/9th would actually falsify your prediction? You can't tell me, can you? Whatever the most significant event of those two days comes to be, that's the proof you were right, and nothing can prove you were wrong.
That is not science. Offer a prediction with objective criteria for whether it will be true or false.
I think SH described it best. It's predicting the past. lol
That's all this nonsense is.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Something of note is happening every day, so long as you set your threshold of "noteworthy" sufficient to your needs.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
How can it be “highly interesting” if you follow that up later with:
"I still need to study it to comment on its interpretation"?
So… you haven’t studied it, but it’s already worthy of bold declarations?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Science is Observation... Belief is Denial without Study, Fools is Prejudice, Prejudice is not Science, it's Fanaticism and Belief and Fools...
So belief without study makes someone a fool… yet you go on to say:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
I still need to study it to comment on its interpretation; it's less tense than the one from Now, and it's highly interesting to observe...
Being completely and absolutely certain that it won't be a normal period... There, very prominent climate and natural processes, that's for sure...
You admit you haven’t interpreted it, but you’re completely and absolutely certain it won’t be a normal period? That’s not observation—it’s exactly the belief-without-study you just criticized. A full contradiction.
And what does “very prominent climate and natural processes” even mean? It’s so vague, any random weather or natural event can be pointed to later as proof you were right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Will I be wrong??? Bet!!!
Bet? You want us to gamble on a vague forecast you haven’t even analyzed yet? The only safe wager is that you’ll be back with more color-coded dramatics, tossing around “science” and “observation” like incantations, while sidestepping actual evidence and methodology.
Your posts have all the formatting of a 90s webpage, and still manage to shed less light than a solar eclipse.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
So, what? Doesn't the precision of Mars, the ancient God of War, make sense to you?
Or is it just a matter of chronic luck?
If you no longer see the importance of what it means for those boulders to move things in the world, then something, forgive me, something is wrong in yours head...
I could be wrong, but I doubt it, but in about 10 days or so, when Mars moves away from forming strong angles with Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, the tensions will calm down...
Here's - bellow - is a graph of my program, which is probably the best ever made for Astrology - the others were made for business, but they had no idea how it works. The proof is that I'm the only Astrology programmer who has ever dared to predict. The others have never predicted anything, they don't know, they just saw a market opportunity, and a chance to win. And some may have known something, but that something was from the astrology that is said out there, which is false. The one that really works is so simple and straightforward that they have I've had to thoroughly discredit it so it doesn't get out -...
This graph of my Cycles Window is key and very simple: an X-axis, a timeline, a Y-axis, angles. You choose what you want to see in what period, and there you can clearly see the key dates. Thanks to this window, I've been able to get it right approximately 85 to 90%:
Click for See:
Ciclos_Mundial_From_02-Jul-2025_To_19-Sep-2025_MarM-SatM_MarM-UraM_MarM-NepM_MarM-PluM.gif
Don't forget that I don't move planets or post anything you can't verify on any astronomy website, and if there's one thing in this world that no power can manipulate, it's the positions of the planets...
No one in this world can move the planets or manipulate their position data, because even with Kepler's simple laws, we have a very high degree of accuracy...
Mars's precision is always the highest of all the planets... It's a true Cosmic Clock...
Best regards...
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
It's getting funnier with every post :D
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
The prophecy returns, in full Technicolor.
It's like a holiday newsletter written by Nostradamus high on caffeine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
So, what? Doesn't the precision of Mars, the ancient God of War, make sense to you?
Love how you start things off with the Crazy Uncle Defense. When confronted with contradictions, just invent a new argument against an invisible critic floating in the ether. Doesn’t matter what anyone actually said, just pick a fight with a voice only you can hear, ideally one that insults Mars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Or is it just a matter of chronic luck?
Sure, right between perpetual perfect coin flips and dice rolls. I'm so sick of winning!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
If you no longer see the importance of what it means for those boulders to move things in the world, then something, forgive me, something is wrong in yours head...
No longer see? You’re the one confusing this place for an astrology forum, and describing Mars and other celestial bodies as mystical boulders. This is exactly why you should never trash the medication your nurses give you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
I could be wrong, but I doubt it, but in about 10 days or so, when Mars moves away from forming strong angles with Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, the tensions will calm down...
Ah, yes, the classic vague cosmic prediction technique, starting with your chronic calling card disclaimer, "I could be wrong, but I doubt it." So, you’re hoping Mars does its thing but, like always, won’t name where this tension is, so you’ll never look wrong. Then you’ll wait for something in the news, anything, and claim, "I told you so." The art of predicting everything and nothing at the same time!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Here's - bellow - is a graph of my program, which is probably the best ever made for Astrology - the others were made for business, but they had no idea how it works. The proof is that I'm the only Astrology programmer who has ever dared to predict. The others have never predicted anything, they don't know, they just saw a market opportunity, and a chance to win. And some may have known something, but that something was from the astrology that is said out there, which is false. The one that really works is so simple and straightforward that they have I've had to thoroughly discredit it so it doesn't get out ...
So, according to what you’ve written in the past, the "elites" have secretly mastered astrology for centuries, using it for success, while the rest of us have been stuck with watered-down, profit-driven versions of astrology. But now that the planets have perfectly aligned and brought you to us, you’re here to save the day.
For someone who claims to be the only astrologer bold enough to predict, why haven’t you made any predictions before they happen? Instead, you wait until after, scribbling like a child using colored chalk on a classroom board.
Be daring, man! How else can we know if you really have your cosmic powers in check?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
And as for your Cycles Window graph, it’s so complex it looks like the astronomy department at NASA took a coffee break and handed you the controls. You’ve managed to take a simple concept, astrology, and turn it into something that looks like a weather forecast for nuts. But hey, I guess that’s the elite knowledge they’re trying to keep hidden from the rest of us, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Don't forget that I don't move planets or post anything you can't verify on any astronomy website, and if there's one thing in this world that no power can manipulate, it's the positions of the planets...
No one in this world can move the planets or manipulate their position data, because even with Kepler's simple laws, we have a very high degree of accuracy...
Thank you for another helpful disclaimer! I can now sleep soundly knowing that Mars can’t just be moved around by my neighbor to cause chaos after I accidentally scratched their car yesterday. What a relief!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Mars's precision is always the highest of all the planets... It's a true Cosmic Clock...
Dammit, I just bought myself a Rolex!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Best regards...
Usually how I end my comments after calling everyone stupid at the start. Not!
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Well, perhaps his best regards aren't all that good?
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
The proof is that I'm the only Astrology programmer who has ever dared to predict. The others have never predicted anything
Speaking of predictions... so August 8th-9th came and went with absolutely nothing of abnormal importance. Prediction wrong or going to latch on to something ordinary and say it fits?
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fafalone
Speaking of predictions... so August 8th-9th came and went with absolutely nothing of abnormal importance. Prediction wrong or going to latch on to something ordinary and say it fits?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Well, pay attention to the next few weeks. They're pretty key, especially around August 8th and 9th, or so...
;) ...
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
By the 5th, he was afraid nothing would happen on the 8th or 9th, so he extended it by 6 more days to the 15th, replacing Mars detonation with calm. LOL!
August 5th:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
I could be wrong, but I doubt it, but in about 10 days or so, when Mars moves away from forming strong angles with Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, the tensions will calm down...
I predict he's gonna move the goalposts again for his non-predictions. :bigyello:
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Oh, how did I discover this so late. I've been missing out. I particularly liked the bit where you told Shaggy that he was only pretending to be a scientist. You should definitely let his colleagues know.
I predict that there will be monumental events in January 2028. They won't be caused by Uranus, though. An anus, certainly. But not Ur one.
Edit> I also predict that this post will be the first on a new page.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FunkyDexter
Oh, how did I discover this so late. I've been missing out. I particularly liked the bit where you told Shaggy that he was only pretending to be a scientist. You should definitely let his colleagues know.
No, he's right about that. I'll be retiring in a couple months, so I'm become a pontificating greybeard.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
I predict James will have around 200 shortcuts pinned to his Taskbar by the end of this year. He currently has 155 pinned there, from what I've seen in his latest YouTube video.
The man really loves collecting apps. :bigyello:
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Well, was the Mars effect seen or not?
Well, the next Mars effect, the next moment of greatest tension, when Mars makes 90 degrees to Saturn and Neptune, which will be followed by a conjunction (0 degrees) of the Sun with Mars...
Will it fail? I wish you were more scientific and put aside your prejudices, which were never science; what matters are the data, the established facts...
The next period of greatest tension will be around December 9-11, 2025, from week minus to week max, climax around the 7 to 13 december...
But it will continue in January 2026, due to the long conjunction of the Sun and Mars - They move seen from Earth at almost the same speed, which is why their effects last for almost a month -...
Note, I don't move planets nor can I change planetary ephemeris, and so it will be, because Mars doesn't fail!!!
The great danger, in any case, is in late 2027 and, above all, 2028. You'll see that...
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
"Something of arbitrary significance might happen over these weeks/months" -- this is not science.
You predicted something would occur and it didn't. Even by a highly unscientific vague standard interpreted very generously.
If you were engaged in science, you would lay out a specific claim, and provide specific criteria for evaluating it. You're not doing that. You're not engaging at all, completely ignoring my comments.
Quote:
The next period of greatest tension will be around December 9-11, 2025, from week minus to week max, climax around the 7 to 13 december...
What will happen , specifically? How do we judge whether this "period of greatest tension" affects anything? Can your claim be falsified at all-- because if not, that's not science. If it can, how?
I'm being scientific here. Not dismissing it out of hand, I've been here asking you for standard, basic science, but you're not offering anything beyond labeling some weeks 'high tension'-- unrelated to science.
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Well, was the Mars effect seen or not?
Ah, you mean the “tensions will calm down” you predicted for August 5th? Still waiting…
August 5th:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
I could be wrong, but I doubt it, but in about 10 days or so, when Mars moves away from forming strong angles with Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, the tensions will calm down...
Apparently reality didn’t get the memo about your cosmic schedule. Or, by your logic, does 'calm down' actually mean "peak tension"? It certainly seems that way, judging by this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Well, the next Mars effect, the next moment of greatest tension, when Mars makes 90 degrees to Saturn and Neptune, which will be followed by a conjunction (0 degrees) of the Sun with Mars...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Will it fail?
Smart move to put Mars on the spot since it left you hanging the last couple of weeks. I would've kicked it to the curb!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James Reynolds
Note, I don't move planets nor can I change planetary ephemeris, and so it will be, because Mars doesn't fail!!!
That's it! Put the pressure on Mars after it failed you the last time! It should've played nice.
Anyway, glad you can’t move planets. Would hate to be your next experiment!
Re: A brief explanation to fafalone
Faf, funny how he kicked this thread off like it was a private message to you, while making sure the rest of us got front-row seats to the Javier Astrology Show.
