Heh.
What do you think about the Iraqi "Information Minister".
Apparently the Iraqi forces killed most of the infidel invaders, and are about to finish them off any time
:D This guy is great.
Printable View
Heh.
What do you think about the Iraqi "Information Minister".
Apparently the Iraqi forces killed most of the infidel invaders, and are about to finish them off any time
:D This guy is great.
Yea, Iraqi soldiers killed all of the US soldiers shown on TV at the baghdad airport. Of course, according to him it was found that the Video tape was filmed in hollywood and if they were there they would have killed them. :D Sad part is people there still believe that crap.:rolleyes:
Some people, but I think people are starting to wake up.
That stunt they pulled where they rolled 60 tanks and Bradleys in and out of the city must have woke some people up.
They won't believe it for too long though, they will soon realize that they are being lied to. To me, the Information Minister is actually doing the regeme bad by saying this. This means the Iraqi people will actually be able to easily say to themselves that they have been lying to us, and that will actually help our cause more. I hope he keeps doing it, it will just make it better for us.
I was waiting for a bomb to take him out when I was watching that last night live. That would have been sooooo sweet. I know, there were others around him, but those guys are feeding the crap to the masses, so they deserve to go with him.
There are quite a few western reporters there to ya know.
It would be funny if he was doing one of his live interviews and an Abrams rolls by in the backround. Lol.
Ya, that would have been funny. It is amazing to me how he does it with a straight face.
He needs to dress as a clown and dance around a bit :D :D :D
He might be more convincing :D :D :D
It could, and SHOULD have been 0 had those @$%#! Blair & Bush not gone into this pointless war in the first place.Quote:
Yup, my point is that it needs to be reduced even more, and the mistakes are far too many.
As to the Uh-Oh what else did we find point, whether saddam had or has WMD is irrelevant as Bush will smuggle, plant & photo a load of WMD anyway if they're not found so he can try to rally people & justfy his cause, there's no way this war's gonna end without them saying they didn't find any!
God I despise these f*****g governments.
You didnt vote labour then??? :D :D :D :D
Some people forget that people are starving to death in Iraq every day. Before anyone says it is just because of sanctions i can say the only reason many get to eat is because of the oil for food program that was set up. Saddam uses all money for himself and does not invest in his country hence the starvation. Look at his palaces he is the worst example of a bad leader that i can think of.
Yes people are dying in war but how many will be saved from starvation when money starts flowing back into their economy again and not into Saddams filthy hands!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Good old Charles Kennedy mate - I went for the underdogs the Lib Dems as they offered more for me.
Blair's had some good idea's when he first started out, but now his head's shoved so far up Bushe's ass, that he's become part of bush, mitosis or whatever it's called - they've become like one person & Blair's stopped completely any thinking he did for himself before!
As far as waking up to a cloud of poison gas, you don't know my co-worker. Boy is it rough working at a field station some times.
For those who are after the terrorists, keep in mind that Sept. 11 was the worst terrorist attack, but the second worst was committed by a blond haired, blue eyed, gulf war veteran. Furthermore, the Tokyo subway attack used Sarin gas, which didn't come from some dictators regime, it was cooked in Japan.
We can't end terrorist threats by getting rid of any group of people. The unfortunate truth is that our own people cause more terrorist attacks than foreign nationals do. If you look at the last ten years of crimes appearing to be terrorism, I would site the Atlanta Olympic bombing, the snipers, Oklahoma City, and WTC I and II. Only the last two were foreign influence. If you add in some plane bombings, it could get a little larger, but I can't think of any US plane terrorist bombings recently.
To summarize this scattered post: The terrorists are us as well as them. To attack a foreign country and kill their people in the belief that it will decrease terrorism, is to ignore the fact that most attacks are domestic by domestics.
Yea, I know. I'm not talking abour sarin gas or ricin or any of the other home brewed coctails. It was confirmed that Saddam had VX Gas and Anthrax by weapons inspectors before saddam threw them out the first time. Where the hell is this stuff. It is either A. destroyed B. Hidden in a hole somewhere C. Sold to someone else. Saddam had 12 years to proove "A" and failed. That only leaves 2 other alternatives.Quote:
Originally posted by Shaggy Hiker
As far as waking up to a cloud of poison gas, you don't know my co-worker. Boy is it rough working at a field station some times.
For those who are after the terrorists, keep in mind that Sept. 11 was the worst terrorist attack, but the second worst was committed by a blond haired, blue eyed, gulf war veteran. Furthermore, the Tokyo subway attack used Sarin gas, which didn't come from some dictators regime, it was cooked in Japan.
Agreed, there is no way to rid the world of terrorists. However, if bombing the crap out of Iraq reduces the odds of terrorists making it to the US/Europe with VX or Anthrax I say go for it.Quote:
We can't end terrorist threats by getting rid of any group of people. The unfortunate truth is that our own people cause more terrorist attacks than foreign nationals do. If you look at the last ten years of crimes appearing to be terrorism, I would site the Atlanta Olympic bombing, the snipers, Oklahoma City, and WTC I and II. Only the last two were foreign influence. If you add in some plane bombings, it could get a little larger, but I can't think of any US plane terrorist bombings recently.
Our government Is responsible enough not to hand out chem/bio weapons to domestic terrorists AFAIK.Quote:
To summarize this scattered post: The terrorists are us as well as them. To attack a foreign country and kill their people in the belief that it will decrease terrorism, is to ignore the fact that most attacks are domestic by domestics.
My point about the Tokyo bombing was that Sarin can probably be manufactured at home (not my home, thanks, but in this country). As for Anthrax, I left it off the list, along with the unibomber. We had our little anthrax attack, and we still don't know who did it. I would bet it was domestic, but I also thought that the snipers would turn out to be a pair of bubbas.
I, personally, feel that bombing the crap out of Iraq makes terrorism more likely, not less. Domestic terrorism won't change one way or another due to this, and I don't see how this will reduce the likelihood of terrorists using chemical weapons. VX might be reduced, but readily manufactured chemicals will not be reduced. Terrorist attacks on civilian populations would be just as effective with lesser chemicals than VX, since the damage will be done before anybody reacts.
:rolleyes: Of course we'll be planting evidence. Isn't that always the case?:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by alex_read
It could, and SHOULD have been 0 had those @$%#! Blair & Bush not gone into this pointless war in the first place.
As to the Uh-Oh what else did we find point, whether saddam had or has WMD is irrelevant as Bush will smuggle, plant & photo a load of WMD anyway if they're not found so he can try to rally people & justfy his cause, there's no way this war's gonna end without them saying they didn't find any!
God I despise these f*****g governments.
No amount of evidence will ever be enough for people like you. And even when it's presented or found, it was either planted or fabricated by our government. You despice these ****ing governments? I hear Antactica is nice this time of year. Their government should suit you just fine.
I feel that if you don't like your government, move or do something about it.
I know in the US, we vote for who is in our government. If we don't like said representitive, we vote to change them out. If that isn't how it is in the country your at, maybe you need to try to fix that, or move to another country that expresses your views. I can't stand people whinning about their government, but yet don't do anything about it. It is in your hands to change the government, or change the place you live. If you stay and don't to anything about it, well..... it must not be too bad!
Please note: In the US and other free contries, you can change things in govt without your life being threatened.Quote:
Originally posted by hellswraith
I feel that if you don't like your government, move or do something about it.
I know in the US, we vote for who is in our government. If we don't like said representitive, we vote to change them out. If that isn't how it is in the country your at, maybe you need to try to fix that, or move to another country that expresses your views. I can't stand people whinning about their government, but yet don't do anything about it. It is in your hands to change the government, or change the place you live. If you stay and don't to anything about it, well..... it must not be too bad!
Saddam could sell Nukes to terrorists that is what they fear!!! You cant build one of them (Thats reliable at least) in your house.
Saddam is a threat because he promotes terrorism, true killing him wont get rid of it but it will reduce the amount of fanatics brought up and will also reduce the terrorists supply of weapons.
Imagine if they set off a nuke in Paris, London, New York etc etc etc!!!!!:( :( :( :(