Quote:
Originally posted by KayJay
I had posted this in another thread, I'll post it here as well
Question to all of you who wanted a war in Iraq, not those who are in right earnest supporting your respective nation's troops, who at the end of the day, are just doing their job, a mighty dangerous one at that.
How many of you know the history of Iraq? The history of the Shia/Sunni conflict? The history of the Kurds' struggle? The history of Mesopotamia/Iraq as a 2500 year old civilization? 100 years for a 2500 year old civilzation is not history, mind U. Its still current affairs.
Another question.
The war, stretching my value system to the hilt, has only one justification. The US of A and its Co-alition partners are sacred to death of the purported WMD being targetted at their nations and families and friends and feel premptive stikes to remove any and all danger to their families and loved ones, right and necessary, be they half-way across the world.
Of course, on record, I am not convinced of neither the presence of sufficient quantities of the WMD (I may be stoned for saying so, therefore I'll cower as I'm scared for my life just as President GWB who has to be scared for millions of American lives, and admit that there are sufficient quantities of WMD. Ok ) nor the intent of Saddam Huessein to bombard the US of A, UK. Why do/did you think Saddam would attack the US of A and the UK before September 2002?
If the reason was not fear of mass murder of American and British lives, but to do the right thing, just a word of caution. The other party has its own sense of right and wrong. So please be careful as to your stated purposes for killing Iraqi soldiers and their families and their regime. Should even 10 of them survive and want to extract revenge, enough proof has been provided of their devastating capabilities.
I second Jamie is stating that the world will not be a safer place. Neither in NY, nor London, nor Chennai, nor Kashmir, nor Chechnya, nor Baghdad.