Printable View
Yes, BodwadUK I know all of that. But I still say there were too many "mistakes".
HB, what are the chances for a guided misile with acuracy of 3 meters to hit a moving train?
You don't drop 500 kg bombs on something you "think" is a tank, but is actually a tractor.
And my next-door was in special police forces in Kosovo. When I asked him about rapeing and stuff he sayd "With KLA on left and right an NATO above me, I didn't even have time for some manual work (if you know what I meen)."
Your government will not be threatened by you so no you are not an enemy. The statement reaches to those who claim to be innocent and yet sit amidst those who are not innocent. E.g If Iraq was guilty of holding nukes and used them on Israel (An Example only). People who sit in Iraq (Civilians) and do not make an effort to remove themselves or prove themselves friendly to you would be considered enemys. The reason is simply this, they are sitting in enemy territory and not showing any signs of frienship so you have to assume they are an enemy because if you dont then it can cause many of your own people to be shot while the civilians stand in the way and pevent any retaliation.
It is becoming increasingly clear that nations are using the weakness of sympathy in their favour. in theory the west will not kill civilians only enemys soldiers and so by placing your soldiers behind a 'Sheild' of civilians you can strike out and cause more damage. The solution to this is to consider all those that are in enemys territory and not showing any signs of friendship to be an enemy as they are supporting the military by being the shield.
Tactics of a human sheild needs to be stopped now or the consiquences of the future can be very grave indeed for the civilian population.
If for example a hospital had nuclear bombs ready for use in its basement, it has now become a military target and could no longer be considered a civilian building no matter how many civilians are in it. The damage of destroying it will be massive and cause chaos in civilian ranks but will eliminate a much larger threat.
e.g We do need to look at the larger picture and that counts for both sides, will a strike on Iraq eliminate the apparent threat or just cause more problems.