Somehow this bypassed when i replied last time.Quote:
Originally posted by Kzin
Jahwol, mein Furher . . . I vill order ze jackboots so ve can all march together . . . ;)
Seriously - what happens when people dissent and say *I don't want any part of this*?
What happens when it's all going quite well - basically most of the world agrees with you to varying extents and thinks by and large you are doing a good job (maybe better than anyone else who has tried)
Now lets say some bearded nutter in a cave on the other side of the world decides to massacre Kedamanites because they don't want to *act as a single mass* or *agreement to be educated*. What do you do then?
Ok a big critical point actually. Who would not want to be part of the system? Well I'm definitely not sure. If the mass media can't reach everywhere and there is people with "evil inside" where the society is weak and everyone is isolated there's a potential threat. In the tightly bound society where everyone will immediately be affected by the ideology, and also I suppose critiminal rate is higher as well as intelligence, the chance of oppositions is much much higher. To deal with this the process has to go step by step to ensure everyone is following. Those who not will be requring more processing than the others.
IF say a little group of opposing nutters would isolize themselves from the rest of the society and hide in some cave, until nobody expects there to be any more but eh.. true kedamanites, and thereby start to disband all military forces, police forces and weapons of all kind and finally forget all ways of defend yourself, you really have a critical situation.
I don't think the police forces will be ever disbanded, there will always be nutters among the society and they would have to be catched and brainwashed again. The police force especially will undergo a more stricter brainwash and educated with the techniques that might not be avaliable to the rest. They would protect the society from all kinds of harm.
The military forces would though need to be disbanded, in the rate the threats are disappearing.
I don't think the dictatorship would be safe enough, I'm definitely not going to say someone has to stand at the top, he could on one hand get shot (chances are high as dictatorship doesn't sound good to people) or the other hand misuse his position or in worst case turn my ideology into something else.Quote:
Another possibility is a world wide benovolent dictatorship that starts applying behavior modification to everybody at at birth. With the right techniques, we can have a world full of docile people. Until the next generation reaches maturity, we can use some of the techniques developed in the USSR to keep everybody under control.
As long as it is a benevolent dictatorship with high ideals, we can trust them to brainwash in the correct behavior.
Actually simply an agreement between the current nations to start to implement the ideology, and all other internal business stays intact.
