Jeez...You guys take stuff to seriously.
Printable View
Jeez...You guys take stuff to seriously.
AMD and Intel are the most known CPU manufacturers, but there are more out there.
VIA make motherboards with their own "x86 compatible" CPUs don't they?
Most of the other ones got put out of business a long time ago...but im sure there are some small time companys that are making some.
I think there are some via processors....do you remember cyrix?
Now you are saying everyone else is touchy (IntelSucks). The way this thread has gone is exactly what Danial was talking about in the first couple posts until you got on his ass about it.Quote:
Originally posted by Danial
No need to get so touchy !
I think you should take your lips off of AMD's ass and just realize that there are only minimal differences between AMD and Intel and everyone who thinks Intel is better isn't wrong. I think you are just compensating for a small schlong. Myself personally I prefer AMD but that doesn't mean I think Intel makes a ****ty processor. I also don't feel the need to attack anyone that feels differently although I think you have been rude to many people answering your post and if you ***** about my post then just read your own words "its funny to start threads like this because everyone starts to get mad and thats what this forum needs." - Glad to oblige.
I believe IBM and Sun make their own processors too but mainly for LARGE super computer type operations. IBM also made the CPU for the PS2 (I think?) and will probably make the one for the next XBOX. Which even though they are consoles they still run on CPUs.
cyrix\via doesnt make processors anymore as far as I know
I think they started back up again sometime this year or so: http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20020605/index.html
Via used to make those cyrix cpus and quit but came back with the c3 (i think thats the name).
Hey Edneeis, stop crying before I buy you a bottle.
thats hilarious
Where TF did you pull them results from, your mum? They couldn't be more wrong then they are. The hyper-threading does not slow the processor down dumb ass.
cid, you been living under a rock or something or you biased too. a lot of that stuff is crap, intel win a lot more of those factors than you seem to think.
My Mum? And I do belive that those results came from the Intel website.
Please send the bottle to:Quote:
Originally posted by cid
Hey Edneeis, stop crying before I buy you a bottle.
1234 UpYours Ln.
SitAndSpin, CA 92530
;)
lame
That is a common mis-conseption (I just butchered that, lol) just like people say Apple is better for video editing or like a studio. AMD can perform, on par, with Intel in graphical applications. Sometimes, depending on what chips are being compared, AMD does even better.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
intel is better for graphical applications. Mainly because AMD mother boards have some AGP issues.
Never had any issues with AGP. However, I have had some issues with the VIA chipset I bought.Quote:
Originally posted by Memnoch1207
AMD issues with AGP
It is probably because you insist on insulting them. While I realize this is the internet and I, at times, act like an ass but god damn man, you make me look like a perfect christian or something online.Quote:
Originally posted by IntelSucks
Jeez...You guys take stuff to seriously.
VIA is a horrible company. I wish I never bought a VIA chipset with my Athlon XP.Quote:
Originally posted by IntelSucks
I think there are some via processors....do you remember cyrix?
I wish they'd die already, it has been over due
That isn't entirely true. Take a look at Intel's 64bit CPU and the Athlon 64. They are severly different and if a consumer tried comparing Intel's 64bit chip to AMD's, they'd be very disappointed.Quote:
Originally posted by Edneeis
only minimal differences between AMD and Intel
Intel's 64bit CPU only supports most 32bit software, but in an emulation mode. So a 3GHz 64bit CPU form Intel (I don't know how fast they currently are) would run a 32bit application like my 533MHz Celeron. It is very very bad at that but does a decent job on 64bit applications. The Athlon 64, however, has native support for both 64 and 32bit applications. There is zero slow down using 32 bit software or 64bit software with the chip.
This is true, I currently own 3 computers and 2 have Intel CPUs. They are not bad, but I still prefer AMD chips.Quote:
Originally posted by Edneeis
Myself personally I prefer AMD but that doesn't mean I think Intel makes a ****ty processor.
IBM makes the PowerPC CPUs for Apple's computers. Motorola used to make them, but IBM took over. Not sure if they use only IBM now or if Motorola still makes some chips for the smaller devices.Quote:
Originally posted by Edneeis
I believe IBM and Sun make their own processors too but mainly for LARGE super computer type operations. IBM also made the CPU for the PS2 (I think?) and will probably make the one for the next XBOX. Which even though they are consoles they still run on CPUs.
Not true. Please tell me how you can make a 3.06GHz CPU. Then tell me how to make it act like 2 CPUs without slowing its speed down.Quote:
Originally posted by Ideas Man
Where TF did you pull them results from, your mum? They couldn't be more wrong then they are. The hyper-threading does not slow the processor down dumb ass.
Hyperthreading is nice for multitasking (I can run a dedicated server off 1 virtual CPU, and play a game on another. Neither will affect the other directly since they're seperate, but you can't expect both to run at the full possible speed).
I like your reply
Of course they do, what else would do all the processing? Perhaps... a non-central processing unit? Hehehe just kidding around, I know what you mean.Quote:
Originally posted by Edneeis
Which even though they are consoles they still run on CPUs.
Though, the Megadrive (a.k.a. Sega Genesis) apparently used a Nintendo graphics processor, a Sony sound processor and a Motorola central processor. I could be wrong but I know for a fact that Nintendo, Sega and Sony all had something to do with each other.
Right. A common misconception that I have seen myself and is my video cards trouble shooting guide. You guys are not in a position to argue this point as I have the actual setup that this effects and KNOW for absolute fact the problem.Quote:
Originally posted by kasracer
That is a common mis-conseption (I just butchered that, lol) just like people say Apple is better for video editing or like a studio. AMD can perform, on par, with Intel in graphical applications. Sometimes, depending on what chips are being compared, AMD does even better.
Arguing with product shills is wearing thin!
Right. Like I said, you dont have the scenario where it is noticable. Just because you dont have the problem, doesnt mean it exists. Sure is easy for people to turn a blind eye.Quote:
Never had any issues with AGP. However
Then don't buy bad motherboardsQuote:
Originally posted by Cander
Right. A common misconception that I have seen myself and is my video cards trouble shooting guide. You guys are not in a position to argue this point as I have the actual setup that this effects and KNOW for absolute fact the problem.
Arguing with product shills is wearing thin!
Has nothin to do with motherboard manufacturer.
Obviously kas and Intel are going to continue to shill AMD as if it isnt possible that it has faults.
Go on believing that.
It has everything to do with the motherboards.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
Has nothin to do with motherboard manufacturer.
It is the AGP driver FROM AMD!!!
You cant win this.
Thanks.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
Just because you dont have the problem, doesnt mean it exists.
Yeah I know that the problem doesn't exist.
Thanks for proving you are a shill.
How do you know it doesnt exist?
If the problem exists than you hav p.o.s motherboard.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
Thanks for proving you are a shill.
How do you know it doesnt exist?
Conitnue making a fool out of yourself trying to make people mad, but it isnt going to work. I know how trolls operate.
I couldn't agree more.Quote:
Originally posted by Edneeis
Now you are saying everyone else is touchy (IntelSucks). The way this thread has gone is exactly what Danial was talking about in the first couple posts until you got on his ass about it.
I think you should take your lips off of AMD's ass and just realize that there are only minimal differences between AMD and Intel and everyone who thinks Intel is better isn't wrong. I think you are just compensating for a small schlong. Myself personally I prefer AMD but that doesn't mean I think Intel makes a ****ty processor. I also don't feel the need to attack anyone that feels differently although I think you have been rude to many people answering your post and if you ***** about my post then just read your own words "its funny to start threads like this because everyone starts to get mad and thats what this forum needs." - Glad to oblige.
I personally like Intel better :)
this review should help you decide which is better :0
http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/...nxp-26-mx.html
No it does. AMD doesn't create drivers for your AGP slot.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
Has nothin to do with motherboard manufacturer.
You obviously haven't read everything I've said if you're grouping me with him. Read -> Post, not vice versa.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
Obviously kas and Intel are going to continue to shill AMD as if it isnt possible that it has faults.
No, AMD does not make AGP drivers nor does it make the connection from the AGP slot to the CPU. The mother board manufacturers do this.Quote:
Originally posted by Cander
It is the AGP driver FROM AMD!!!
You cant win this.
INTEL ALL THE WAY BABY...!!!
AMD SUX
Um.... we've been saying this for a while..... you're a little late....Quote:
Originally posted by wrack
AMD ALL THE WAY BABY...!!!
INTEL SUX
u can never be late on a forum :p
:D
Ya well twisting the truth bcos you are jealous of Intel success or bunch of loosers who haven't got anything else to do.
Get a real work to do and oh yaa whatever the poll result is take this.
NO ONE BLOODY CARES
Quote:
Originally posted by kasracer
Um.... we've been saying this for a while..... you're a little late....
I really hate these sterotipcal responces. They seem to ALWAYS crop up in an arguement, ALWAYS. The worst part is that it isn't even true and you would know that if you actually READ my posts.Quote:
Originally posted by wrack
Ya well twisting the truth bcos you are jealous of Intel success or bunch of loosers who haven't got anything else to do.
"Get a real work"Quote:
Originally posted by wrack
Get a real work to do and oh yaa whatever the poll result is take this.
LOL, I just thought that was funny.
Friggin BritsQuote:
Originally posted by wrack
NO ONE BLOODY CARES
Looks like its tied up....and why are you posting if you dont bloody care?
For fun. :p
Ok guys these Intel fruits just dont listen to the facts because they have seen to many intel (subliminal messages) commercials. We have presented many facts about how AMD is better and they still want to argue AGP errors? THey need to get a grip pull their mouth off the medias nipple and get with the better CHEAPRER processor. A real programmer has AMD.
Wrong again. I work as a programmer and every company I have seen which does programming work has Intel so if just by using AMD if you think that other programmers who uses Intel are not real programmer then you need to get out more my friend.
Intel is better.
:wave: