Nah, XP uses a LOT of resources with its butt ugly UI... And changing its look to classing only makes it LOOK like regular windows... still hogs resources.
Z.
Printable View
Nah, XP uses a LOT of resources with its butt ugly UI... And changing its look to classing only makes it LOOK like regular windows... still hogs resources.
Z.
i still think its security is useless.. only takes up memory and resources, but your right about the interface lol :D
Hmm, maybe i spoke too soon... i read that XP is win2k + win9x + mac os-style ui. But im sure what you say is probably correct, ill stop talkin about something i dont kno anything about and refrain from making an ass of myself.
i thought of this as a friendly chatter rather than a debate lol
:D
I know that, but if you read my original post, programs run on my slower comp at 100s of fps while on every comp that my firends have with XP, programs run at like 0.5fpsQuote:
Originally posted by ice_531
that would be determined by the users pc, not just the os -
ram, cable/dsl or 56k... and other aspects determine the speed :p