ijkl
Printable View
ijkl
mnop
qrst
uvwx
yz01
2345
6789
Muwahaha! Power of no 30 second wait
I can post... FOREVER!
Size 6 post
Size 1 post
I need to write an auto bot to write this carp for me!
You get it, carp?
Like the fish that's crap.
Magikarp!
Splash
That was it's only move.
Until level 15 then it learned tackle.
And then at level 20 it evolved into the OP Garados!
I recognize the language....and I can see that it is divided into nice sentences....but I understand not a word of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
I had difficulties understanding that as well, but it could be my complete lack of knowledge on the topic.
At the risk of upsetting DD by reintroducing politics back into post race I'll explain. Through the 60s the UK used to run two kinds of schools, Grammars and Secondary Moderns. The idea was that academically gifted kids would go to Grammars while less gifted kids would go to Secondary Moderns. Which you went to was decided by a test you sat at age 11 called the 11+. The idea was that Grammar schools kids would be pushed harder and progress at a faster rate while SM kids would still be pushed but not so hard that they'd be left behind. It was an attempt to progress each kid as fast as they could handle. Sadly the reality tended to be that the Secondary Moderns were underfunded and just became dumping grounds.
In the 70s (I think) the labour party largely abolished both (there are a few exceptions still floating around) and replace them with comprehensives where all kids would attend the same classes regardless of ability. I personally think this was just throwing the baby out with the bath water and means that in a given class you're either going to have gifted kids being held back or weaker kids just being left behind. Actually, you probably get both as the class gets pitched at the centre of the bell curve.
I personally think that streaming by ability is pretty much a no brainer, as long as you're not under funding those at the back and you allow kids to move up and down streams as appropriate. Probably separating them into different schools was a bit daft but, in the UK, they're not even separated into different classes.
Anyway, politics over...
Moar Size 6 Posts!
lol....this place panders to feminism like nearly all mainstream sites. If you want sites that haven't been touched by feminism try 4chan.org or the red pill reddit.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedSomeAnswers
Anyways, the reason I ask is that the topic being discussed, the wage gender gap issue is actually feminist trolling. In other words, its not a real topic, just mental masturbation by hardcore feminists that somehow managed to get taken seriously by the mainstream.
No, not really. The gender gap is a real thing with multiple causes. It is going away, bit by bit, but it still exists. It also starts very early on and persists. As women increasingly outnumber men in higher education, it seems likely to reverse. There will always be a difference, though, and that's a good thing.
I've never ever seen this occur in real life. To me, its a myth that was the product of careful wordplay and deliberate misinterpretation of statistical data. I don't know anyone who would actually say to themselves or anyone that they would pay someone less for the same job simply because they are a woman. This flies in the face of basic common sense and feminism is devoid of common sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
Imagine a world without children... Future generations will thank us!
I have seen it happen, to a small extent. This was a bigger issue a few decades back, which is before I entered the labor force. It was certainly an issue for an earlier generation.
They will be applauding us!Quote:
Originally Posted by dday9
Finally, we will know the sound of one hand clapping.
c-c-c-c-c-ombo breaker!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
Ewww :sick:Quote:
Originally Posted by SJWhiteley
Marvel vs Capcom 2 > Ultimate Mortal Kombat > All versions of Killer Instinct combined!!
You've seen employers deliberately pay less because the employee is a woman ? What was the employer's reasoning ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker
Because she's a woman. Duh...Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya
Yeh i was tempted to reply to a few posts BUT this is post race and i feel i have sullied it enough already!!!Quote:
Anyway, politics over...
In my experience Humans are really excellent at flying in the face of common senseQuote:
This flies in the face of basic common sense
In fact i would go as far as to say we do few things better.
:thumb:
The thumb is my favorite smiley.
Any time I rep anyone I just type it in the comment.
It's like, "Good Job Mate" only in a Australian accent.
I like to pretend that everyone on VBForums has an Australian accent except for JMcIlhinney.
That's exactly right. It wasn't more complex than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by homer13j
I hate having flies in my face, and I'm sure common sense does too. However, I know this because flies like eyes. Common sense doesn't have any "I"s, but I'm sure that flies are still attracted to its face because they like to annoy common sense as much as they like to annoy me. Heck, most of them don't even land, they just fly back and forth trying to stick their tongues out at me...but they can't because they are flies and don't have tongues. It's really frustrating for all involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niya