No mercy it is then Niya.
Printable View
Beef4lyfe kid!!
Imma gonna ask the mods for a name change. Imma change my handle to "EatBeefAllDay"
Do you have a favourite dinosaur that you like more than the others? Take your time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur
"Triceratops (Greek for "three-horn face") is a genus of herbivorous ceratopsid dinosaur that first appeared during the late Maastrichtian stage of the late Cretaceous period, about 68 million years ago" (Wiki). You can't murder beef if you are a Triceratops, try again ugga boye.
That is what it means to be higher on the food chain.
I've been having <ahem> "stomach problems" that have been getting worse and worse for about 3 or 4 years. Been to see the doctors and there's nothing diagnosable so I've been cutting out various types of food to see what effect it has. A couple of weeks ago I tried cutting out meat and, while not perfect, my digestion improved pretty dramatically. Conclusion: I may be forced to cut meat out of my diet completely.Quote:
If hell is a place where I can eat beef all day, then sign me up!
Hell is the place where you can't eat beef all day.:cry:
Mind you, I had a burger last night and damn the consequences. It should be noted that there are two meanings for the word "damn" and both are equally applicable.
I don't have the statistics, either. They line every fenced stream in this state, though.
I was wondering why you kept talking about UV radiation. I assumed that it was an afterthought, but now it looks like you really think that UV is related to heat. Are you sure you aren't thinking of IR? UV has little or nothing to do with heating as far as I can tell, it only deals with sunburns. The link you provided did show UV max, but also showed (and stated) that maximum surface temperature was much later. The link I gave you wasn't terribly hard to navigate to find the maximum daily temperature. Just click the radio button for the archived data, then select any day in the listbox. The daily max temperatures are there. However, since you seem to have gotten onto UV, I can see why you weren't able to get it, because that isn't in those reports.Quote:
Sadly I couldn't seem to work out how to get the figures I needed to work out the U.V. and temp readings over the course of a day.
When I was talking about U.V. and temp over the course of a day I was talking about that:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/clisci0.html
"By the time the surface temperature reaches its maximum, the amount of UV radiation reaching the surface has decreased almost by half of that at solar noon". At noon there is max U.V. and the temp is close to the daily max making it the worst time of the day in a desert. I know the temp can stay elevated near the daily max sometimes not dropping until 10pm or later, but noon is still the most stressful time in my view.
What's up with the UV?
Classic! As soon as that video started, I recognized Dr. Dan Schill. He's a reasonable person to have talking about redband trout, since he has been involved with so much research on them. They aren't "making their way" into the desert. They've been there longer than we have.Quote:
Trout are typically regarded as cool climate fish so that is a problem if they are making their way into desert areas like the redbands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXqrE2IJVnQ
Which ones? The desert fish, or the introduced species? Trout are trout, so you either like them or not. Redbands never get all that big, and I don't know of a single species found in desert streams that grows large enough to bother eating. You can certainly try eating chubs, if you so desire. There are plenty of species of those that are not endangered. I don't know of a single species that is consumed by humans, though.Quote:
As far as I am aware the majority of the native desert fish in North America are endangered or have become extinct this century including the bonytail chub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonytail_chub due to pressure from non native species. One solution is to reintroduce some of the endangered species of native desert fish in order to avoid the problems you are talking about regarding the water temperature killing the non native or temperate climate species. I bet some of those species are extremely tasty.
On one point I would agree with Witis: If we banned the consumption of cows for meat, hides, and all the other things that they are used for (every part of the cow is used), that would work pretty well for me, because it would drive cows to extinction in no time. They simply aren't suited to live on their own, and wouldn't survive for long. The only reason they are sitll with us is because we find them useful. Without that, all the talk of evnironmental degradation that they cause would be moot.
So if we stop having cows as a protein source then what will it be replaced by?
Remember that movie Soylent Green (1973 might be too long ago for the young folk here).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IKVj4l5GU4
So, let's move on to the next thing.
True, I can't imagine why they would fence them otherwise except to protect small shrubs and other plant life.Quote:
I don't have the statistics, either. They line every fenced stream in this state, though.
The U.V. chart shows the sun's intensity peaks at midday although it takes a few hours for the temperature to peak in response, even so the temperature at midday is only a few degree lower than its daily peak, thus the midday sun is the most intense time of the day in the desert. The water can be warmed indirectly by the air temperature or directly by the sun thus the water is being heated the most at midday and that is when the sun is overhead meaning that any trees lining the stream will have little to no impact on the daily water temperature. So I am not convinced a. that there are very many tall trees lining the desert rivers and streams and b. even if there are whether they can substantially lower the water temperature given the heating effect of the midday sun.Quote:
I was wondering why you kept talking about UV radiation. I assumed that it was an afterthought, but now it looks like you really think that UV is related to heat. Are you sure you aren't thinking of IR? UV has little or nothing to do with heating as far as I can tell, it only deals with sunburns. The link you provided did show UV max, but also showed (and stated) that maximum surface temperature was much later. The link I gave you wasn't terribly hard to navigate to find the maximum daily temperature. Just click the radio button for the archived data, then select any day in the listbox. The daily max temperatures are there. However, since you seem to have gotten onto UV, I can see why you weren't able to get it, because that isn't in those reports.
What's up with the UV?
I am not sure that was the point Dan was making, he was suggesting that it wasn't their natural environment and that they only survive in the desert in cool spring fed streams i.e. trout are a cool climate rather than a desert fish and that they haven't evolved to live there.Quote:
Classic! As soon as that video started, I recognized Dr. Dan Schill. He's a reasonable person to have talking about redband trout, since he has been involved with so much research on them. They aren't "making their way" into the desert. They've been there longer than we have.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Witis
Not the trout as they are a cool climate species and so you know that there are going to be problems trying to get them to survive in the desert, so any of the native species that have evolved to withstand desert conditions. As far as picking out the species to focus on I guess that would involve a series of taste tests to determine which varieties will be most sought after in the fish markets, although perhaps you can make a case for some of the other less tasty varieties.Quote:
Which ones? The desert fish, or the introduced species? Trout are trout, so you either like them or not. Redbands never get all that big, and I don't know of a single species found in desert streams that grows large enough to bother eating. You can certainly try eating chubs, if you so desire. There are plenty of species of those that are not endangered. I don't know of a single species that is consumed by humans, though.
My vision on this issue is that you are not allowed to murder innocent creatures in the same way that humans are not allowed to murder each other or execute innocent men. You mean that you actually want to go around trying to murder everything while trying to take over the universe? If that is the case then you clearly don't want to live in heaven, you want to live in a nihilistic lair of iniquity instead, and that means going to hell when you are finally caught and brought to justice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3ZcZ2h4Ths
How do you consider it ok to kill a fish or a lizard and are against a chicken or a cow?
If you are using "animal IQ" then that lizard and chicken are pretty close - right?
The way I justify it is that 10,000 years ago man domesticated cows and figured out how to grow better vegetables. I consider both of those aspects to be the same - farming is farming - whether we have a man-made oyster bed, fish farms or chicken farms.
If you think cows are just special mammals for some other reason - religion or culture, for instance - then this is just a silly debate.
Why debate culture? The points is that you and yours "own" you culture - and I have my own :)