[RESOLVED] !! About the new type of Single Language MSDN that I am making for Microsoft !!

I have the project working in some sort of .NET Projector that I have been able to write for the COM Project. Look it works, really well. So then there is not a chance in the world to change it, because it works right. However there are some sort of problems, that go with the two commands, and they are: The DIR and also the OPEN VB6 commands. They have to be worked on, and then fixed so that they work properly inside the Projector...

PS: I got one of the Projects, working inside the .NET Projector. It's name is: QuickBrowser. Which is the very same one that was from the COM Project, I just placed it in a COM OCX File and then placed it into .NET as a COM Object. Then compiled the Project and then wrote some of the code, to work on the Projector. The Source Code that I wrote the Projector with, you can ask for it, if you want to use it in your .NET Projects. You have my word, that you can use it if you want to use it, please ask for it...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by samuelk

It's like spending a year building a car and then a year using a manual to convert it into a boat instead of spending 6 months reading the manual, 6 months building the boat and then having an extra year to enjoy sailing it.

---

Well, some people say it's not the end that matters, but the journey to the end.
With VB6, though, I must say it looks like the end has long past gone, but the journey, for some weird reason, still continues.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker

It's STILL a learning experience, you'd just be learning something other than what you want to learn.

---

need, not want. IMO the OP 'wants' to learn VB6 whereas he needs to learn dotnet.

.

What do you mean by: Learn VB6??? I have been able to learn most of the stuff that was on offer, in University. But then there are still more things to learn from that. Also like now, I am being able to learn .NET, even without being in a University Degree, as such and then the like...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

Question: How do you make an Windows EXE File, using Visual Studio 2010??? Can you please go through the steps, one by one???

!! Thanks in advance !!

---

This is the wrong forum to ask for that kind of advice. I thought you must have realized at least as much after so many posts here.

Anyways, I don't know if your doggedness is a virtue or a vice. It certainly is a rich source of entertainment in this otherwise drab landscape.




Learn VB6??? Did anyone ever say that? I thought people were trying to 'forget' VB6, it's so old!

.

Quote:

---

This is the wrong forum to ask for that kind of advice. I thought you must have realized at least as much after so many posts here. Anyways, I don't know if your doggedness is a virtue or a vice. It certainly is a rich source of entertainment in this otherwise drab landscape. Learn VB6??? Did anyone ever say that? I thought people were trying to 'forget' VB6, it's so old!

---

Yes I know, that...

At this very point in time: I am now converting my VB6 Projects, into COM Controls. Thus being able to import them as .NET Projects. This means that they are also very well and truly compressed, in deed. This is very good news. But then it makes a lot of time, for writing the Control. Which in actual fact is the very same one for each of the VB6 Projects...

I've been looking at my Source Code in VB6 COM and then discovered that there aren't any kind of Automation Errors, to deal with. But then when I run the OCX File, in VB6 COM to get a handle on the Errors. But then it then comes up with an Error Code of "440", which then means that there is an error with the Source Code. I have been looking in the Debugger, and found nothing as to where this type of error can appear. Also it isn't telling me as to where this error is appearing. So then what do I do, when dealing with this type of error code???

I have never been able to deal with an error that cannot appear out of the Source Code. Also it is telling me that there is an error with the ActiveX Control Object, that I have been able to write for the VB6 COM Project, which is thus named: Visual Suite SX. Don't worry about the name, it isn't going to stay. It will then be able to be renamed after the Project has been able to be released, as such and then the like...

!! Thanks in advance !!

As someone has already told you, the error means it needs to be rewritten in VB.NET.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

At this very point in time: I am now converting my VB6 Projects, into COM Controls. Thus being able to import them as .NET Projects. This means that they are also very well and truly compressed, in deed. This is very good news. But then it makes a lot of time, for writing the Control. Which in actual fact is the very same one for each of the VB6 Projects...

---

I hate to hand out serious advice, however this is not what people meant when they said you need to use DotNet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

I've been looking at my Source Code in VB6 COM and then discovered that there aren't any kind of Automation Errors, to deal with. But then when I run the OCX File, in VB6 COM to get a handle on the Errors. But then it then comes up with an Error Code of "440", which then means that there is an error with the Source Code. I have been looking in the Debugger, and found nothing as to where this type of error can appear. Also it isn't telling me as to where this error is appearing. So then what do I do, when dealing with this type of error code???

I have never been able to deal with an error that cannot appear out of the Source Code. Also it is telling me that there is an error with the ActiveX Control Object, that I have been able to write for the VB6 COM Project, which is thus named: Visual Suite SX. Don't worry about the name, it isn't going to stay. It will then be able to be renamed after the Project has been able to be released, as such and then the like...

!! Thanks in advance !!

---

It must be Saddam's doing, inserting errors in your code!

No wait, Saddam is dead. It must be Laden's doing then!


Heck, he is dead too! Can't we find someone else of the stature of these two so we can blame the errors on them?

.

Bush:thumb:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FunkyDexter

Bush:thumb:

---

Well, on that line how many other ex-presidents can you name?

I am really losing touch with the reality, I must take a break.

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

At this very point in time: I am now converting my VB6 Projects, into COM Controls. Thus being able to import them as .NET Projects. This means that they are also very well and truly compressed, in deed. This is very good news. But then it makes a lot of time, for writing the Control. Which in actual fact is the very same one for each of the VB6 Projects...

---

This is not what I meant at all by switching to .NET, what you are doing is taking an old, semi-useless at this point language, and putting it in a new, very useful "Projector" that has a completely different and better language that comes with it. By doing this, you are creating excessive amounts of fail, and because of this, I feel that you should have you're laptop/computer/toaster removed from your possession and given to an infant Chinese boy, so that one day he can use it for something at least half useful.\

At this point, there is no way I can come to believe that English is your first language, or that you are Australian. If I were to guess, I would have to say that you are Brazilian, I know a lot of Brazilian people, and all, or at least most, of them are stubborn/ignorant and terrible at the English language, just like you are. I refuse to further give to good advice until you tell me your Nationality and the first SPEAKING language that you EVER learned, or the one that you can use correctly.

Portuguese to English is very rough, so I could understand why you don't listen when anyone tries to help you.

Or maybe you are the Yotamarker...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by honeybee

Well, on that line how many other ex-presidents can you name?

I am really losing touch with the reality, I must take a break.

.

---

You only need to know the previous one. All the other ones are known for the things they did-or-did-not-do-and-if-they-did-it-wasn't-them-and-if-it-was-you-can't-prove-it-and-if-you-can-then-they-just-write-a-book.

Well I am not sure on why you don't believe me that I am what I am. Just that when I revieal my project to Microsoft, then you will know then...

Ok let's say that English is your first language(hard to believe since i am using it better and it's not my first language). Then the next logical question that comes into mind is how old are you.If i had to guess i would probably say...errr....Six?Am i close enough?
And if you tell a fib we should start asking you about women(girls for your) and then it would be difficult to hide your age!

Well I am: 32 years old...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sapator

Ok let's say that English is your first language(hard to believe since i am using it better and it's not my first language). Then the next logical question that comes into mind is how old are you.If i had to guess i would probably say...errr....Six?Am i close enough?
And if you tell a fib we should start asking you about women(girls for your) and then it would be difficult to hide your age!

---

Well, to be extremely fair, English isn't my first language and I can speak / write it better than many other people, so that really doesn't hold water.

And going by the coherent parts of his posts, he is definitely older than six years. Other than my nephew who is two and a half years old, I have yet to see a kid come up with so many coherent statements in a single thread.

.

Well I can also say the very same as that, last Post from honeybee...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

Well I can also say the very same as that, last Post from honeybee...

---

Beware! I might sue you for copyright infringement! That post is copyrighted to me and you cannot say the very same thing as I have said!

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by honeybee

Beware! I might sue you for copyright infringement! That post is copyrighted to me and you cannot say the very same thing as I have said!

.

---

I second that ...



Oops ..


* calls lawyer *

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by visualAd

I second that ...



Oops ..


* calls lawyer *

---

Don't worry, it's the letter that's copyrighted, not the intent.

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

Just that when I revieal my project to Microsoft, then you will know then...

---

Based on my experiences dealing with Microsoft, I can just about guarantee you that they won't even look at your program unless it supports Visual FoxPro.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

Well I am not sure on why you don't believe me that I am what I am. Just that when I revieal my project to Microsoft, then you will know then...

---

I have witnessed 4 year olds use English better than this. That is why I do not believe you and refuse to believe that English is your first language, and if it is, you might as well just say it isn't and just start typing in gibberish.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thebuffalo

I have witnessed 4 year olds use English better than this.

---

He has stated multiple times that he has dyslexia, so questioning his use of English is a dead horse. I've seen Americans who don't speak any other language and are well into adulthood use worse grammar. Most of them are on CraigsList.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by samuelk

He has stated multiple times that he has dyslexia, so questioning his use of English is a dead horse. I've seen Americans who don't speak any other language and are well into adulthood use worse grammar. Most of them are on CraigsList.

---

My very good friend has dyslexia and he is semi-retarded too, he can still put words in the correct order they go in and use them correctly. Dyslexia is NOT the cause of his butchering of the English language. It isnt even the grammar, he uses words COMPLETELY wrong and mixes them up in sentences. The order of his sentences are that as if he is translating from another language.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thebuffalo

My very good friend has dyslexia and he is semi-retarded too, he can still put words in the correct order they go in and use them correctly. Dyslexia is NOT the cause of his butchering of the English language.

---

Because dyslexia only comes in one form and everyone who suffers from it is identical. I know perfectly competent programmers who only speak English but write just as bad as TheImp.

I didn't know dyslexia causes people to use buzzwords extensively and throw around phrases without any regard to their meaning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baja_yu

I didn't know dyslexia causes people to use buzzwords extensively and throw around phrases without any regard to their meaning.

---

That's usually caused by "majoring in marketing at college", but I think it's the least of his problems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by samuelk

That's usually caused by "majoring in marketing at college", but I think it's the least of his problems.

---

Hehe :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by samuelk

That's usually caused by "majoring in marketing at college", but I think it's the least of his problems.

---

Coffee Spew! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baja_yu

I didn't know dyslexia causes people to use buzzwords extensively and throw around phrases without any regard to their meaning.

---

But seriously

Over the course of this thread, I've moved slightly towards: Yotamarker. I don't put the percentage very high, yet, but it is not zero anymore.

Well then I can now say that we can call, this Thread: Reolved???
Don't you???

Yes.

Reolved.

OMG.....I'm gonna miss this thread continually popping up in my CP's subscribed threads. It will feel weird not seeing that anymore....wow 15 pages......Intriguing thread.

-- Freeky, you mean???

That's just one of many adjectives I'd use to describe this epic thread. :)

What reolved the thread? Yotamarker?

No way man, not @yotamarker. But then I was able to be converted to be using .NET, instead of just COM for my Project...

So what did you do exactly?I mean you coded something, can we see it?(i can't believe i'm asking but anyhow).

Right-ie ho there it is, right now for Download!!

Well, I guess the thread was marked as Resolved quite a long while back, however the popularity of the thread with the members keeps it going still, possibly producing many unresolved questions than the original one.

.

Right on, dude. So then can we please stop posting, but please only if it is necessary then please do so...

And how am i supposed to run this?Where is the setup?

There isn't as yet, because I am still working on Internet Activation and also serial regisration, and things like that...

Why bother?....Err anyhow.

Well I am trying to make it look really professional, and then make alot of processes inside of it. Trying to do some good, in fact of the matter...

Well, I can understand the internet activation, but not the cereal registration. You always seem to be going against the grain.

lol, that was so funny that I nearly fell out of my chair!!

What a load of tosh .... unsubscribed

Nooooooooo!Stay true to the cause!"In fact of the matter",Unsubscribe means mutiny!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sapator

Nooooooooo!Stay true to the cause!"In fact of the matter",Unsubscribe means mutiny!

---

-- Thanks for the help, sapator, I needed it...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThEiMp

No way man, not @yotamarker. But then I was able to be converted to be using .NET, instead of just COM for my Project...

---

You were able to be converted? Please explain.

Catholic to Muslim?

Catholic, of course...

I'm addicted to cats too. They're just sooo cuddly.

--You would have to in times like these, going on right about now!!

I will buy your program and all rights to it for $3 USD.

No way, dude I am not loosing the right to the product. Also that is way and also far too cheap to purchase my products...

He has already being offered 1mil Euros and you give him 3 lousy dollars?Pff pathetic!