yay! go get it:
www.microsoft.com/ie
Printable View
yay! go get it:
www.microsoft.com/ie
There is no big difference between ie5.5 and ie6
what???????? you are joking right :)Quote:
Originally posted by abdul
There is no big difference between ie5.5 and ie6
itis a big difference. it looks totally different. it looks like MSN, different skin.
and by the way you are alittle late
http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=99529
Sorry, I did not know that it had skins with it now. I just downloaded the preview version of it once and it did not hav skins in it so there was not much difference.
I will download it for sure now;)
Oooh... Aaaah... it has skins.
***?
I hope it has something more than skins. I hope it is smaller, faster, and 100% compliant with all W3C standards.
I also hope it is configureable, letting me install only the options I want.
It should also have multiple integrated windows so you can open as many pages as you want with one instance of the browser.
ohhh sweet:p
It does? I just installed it and couldn't find any such option...Quote:
Originally posted by CiberTHuG
Oooh... Aaaah... it has skins.
no, I just checked ms website now and it does say anything about skins:rolleyes:
It just says that it has a new design in Window Xp
But I liked the XP look. :( Bummer.
Okay, everyone missed my sarcasm.
I don't care about skins, I want to know about performance.
You buy a Mustang for looks. I buy a Talon to kick your ass in the quarter mile. :)
For me, I will get it based on its appearence:D
I want something that doesn't crash
And MS product always does;)
Yes, well you are an idiot. Civilization will be better off when you and yours die off.Quote:
Originally posted by abdul
For me, I will get it based on its appearence:D
If you are sick of an inferior product, but you get something based on looks only. What is that about?
I should have made my post more sensible:
Actually, If IE6 has the same old interface then the previous version is still better than downloading it again...and now this version won't support Netscape-like plugins, java technology, and that quicktime player:D
I here IE 6 is loaded with Bugs. Cnet has suggested people to wait on this until they come out with a SP1 for this. It also does not support any Netscape pluggins. I guess it's Payback time. It will support ActiveX components as long as they match up to the buggy code. LOL...The way I understand it all these new apps based on XP, which IE 6 is, are going to be buggy. Microsoft just may end up taking themselves down......It wouldn't hurt my feelings. LOL...:D
Since it is just shy of your goal...
And if I understand you, you want a browser that is no more complaint then the one you have, and doesn't support Java, and doesn't support Quicktime, and doesn't support plugins, as long as it looks prettier?Quote:
Originally posted by abdul
edited by Thug
Actually, If IE 6 has the same old interface, then the previous version is still better then downloading 6. Now 6 won't support plugins, Java technology, and the Quicktime player.
***?
it really does. my IE rarely ever crashes anyway..
i think the media bar should allow you to play MP3s on your drive from a playlist. and if you open a new window, the song its playing will still be playing. and if you close that window, whatever its playing will transfer over to the new window.
combined with iSpeed its pretty fast..
This is something I dislike about the MS approach to UI.Quote:
Originally posted by nabeels786
i think the media bar should allow you to play MP3s on your drive from a playlist. and if you open a new window, the song its playing will still be playing. and if you close that window, whatever its playing will transfer over to the new window.
I don't want one application that does everything for me. Call me crazy, but... I want my web browser to only have web browsing code. I want my MP3 player, to only have MP3 player code.
Now I can understand a media player that supports MPx, instead of just MP3. And I can understand my web browser having hooks to start my media player.
But the two should be seperate applications, on the off chance that I like one and not the other. Or I upgrade one and not the other, or, heaven forbid, I just don't want one, just the other.
Quote:
Originally posted by CiberTHuG
Since it is just shy of your goal...
And if I understand you, you want a browser that is no more complaint then the one you have, and doesn't support Java, and doesn't support Quicktime, and doesn't support plugins, as long as it looks prettier?
***?
yeah, i dont really care about looks, as long as it works.
i just reformatted...ahhh outlook need antialiased icons..i dunno IE6 just seems reallly different..
Quote:
Originally posted by CiberTHuG
This is something I dislike about the MS approach to UI.
I don't want one application that does everything for me. Call me crazy, but... I want my web browser to only have web browsing code. I want my MP3 player, to only have MP3 player code.
Now I can understand a media player that supports MPx, instead of just MP3. And I can understand my web browser having hooks to start my media player.
But the two should be seperate applications, on the off chance that I like one and not the other. Or I upgrade one and not the other, or, heaven forbid, I just don't want one, just the other.
yeah, but i also like less clutter in my taskbar. but winamp takes care of the audio stuff. i think IE is microsoft best program. so what if its uninstallable and integrated into windows, doesnt matter to me. my windows hasnt crashed once since i installed 2k on it (which is more than a month now). i like IE being integrated, it makes it easier..i was reading a mag that said XP stood for xtended proceedings, yeah its pretty wrong of them to include/integrate everything...damn those meglomaniacs
I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say anything about different skins. I said it has a different skin and it is different. like Abdul said it is like the design of XP and I think that is ugly.Quote:
Originally posted by abdul
no, I just checked ms website now and it does say anything about skins:rolleyes:
It just says that it has a new design in Window Xp
But I agree with CiberThug, I don't want pretty, just want it to work. I hate the mp3 bar and all that crap. I used it once and uninstalled it. good ridence :D
Has anybody even gotten window xp beta or any other edition?
Will the ISPs supoprt this version after it is released because I can't get my inernet working right now on windows xp.
And how is this problem related to your ISP? The protocols have not changed. You have a problem in XP.Quote:
Originally posted by abdul
Will the ISPs supoprt this version after it is released because I can't get my inernet working right now on windows xp.
Then don't put anything in your taskbar. I personally don't use the mouse, so I keep clutter to a minimum by not needing it.Quote:
but i also like less clutter in my taskbar.
Yes and yes. :) IE just uses standard HTTP like any other browser, so any ISP worth a d*** should support it.Quote:
Originally posted by abdul
Has anybody even gotten window xp beta or any other edition?
Will the ISPs supoprt this version after it is released because I can't get my inernet working right now on windows xp.
IE6 is full of bugs? ermm i dont think so
someone shud make a prog that will subclass IE into a mdi window..hey theres an idea!
/me starts VB
You misunderstood that. I was talking about windows xp that my ISP does not support this version of window:DQuote:
Originally posted by filburt1
Yes and yes. :) IE just uses standard HTTP like any other browser, so any ISP worth a d*** should support it.
your isp doesn't have sh*t to do with your windows version
My ISP is *****ed up but I can't find any other DSL ISP in my town:)
I realy like to have internet access on windows xp and also linux but my ISP does not work on any of them:(
BTW Skitchen:
You signatures are great. I was always looking for those 3 sites;)
lol, no one tell john... ill get caps locked at if he finds out
:D It is a good resource anyway:D
if you are running DSL then you might have to get rid of it. if Winxp doesn't support some of the stuff that your ISP has to have in order for the DSL to connect to them, then ya you will have to go without or get dialup. I don't think you should have any problem though as XP is not that much different than any other windows, as far as the networking goes.. I wouldn't think.
Linux on DSL might be a little harder. I don't know how to hook linux for DSL as I never had to do it.
what kind of connection do you thing is better other then dial-up? dial-up is so slow now. What most of the people use anyway?
cable is much better than dialup and DSL
The cable service providers in Edmonton can't keep their damned thing up for more than ten minutes, and I'm not kidding. I've had my DSL for three years with Telus Communications, and downtime has totalled about an hour.Quote:
Originally posted by scoutt
cable is much better than dialup and DSL
see it all depends on who provides it. I have had @home and I never had a problem.
Here's a goodie:
Can anyone tell me how google and others do this:
http://toolbar.google.com/
And i.e toolbar or something and can you do it in vIsual BAsic?
anyone??
thanks
it is a plug-in that you download and I think you can do it in VB. if I remember right someone asked this question about 3-4 months ago in the general forum, it might have been longer though.