Printable View
Does anyone know how Windows NT takes the password, and throws it through a one way encryption scheme. Does anyone have that code. L0pht Heavy Industies found a way, So I believe the code is not only in Microsofts's Sealed whatever. Any help is appreciated. EISECURE please don't resopnd unless you have the final answer you seem to lock my threads.
lol...
I'll just give you a final answer.
The answer is: Yes
You can easily get the NT password. If you want to know how, just tell me.
Well, if you want to do heavy security stuff, you gotta know the subject first. (ie.: "How do I RSA a file??");) :DQuote:
EISECURE please don't resopnd unless you have the final answer you seem to lock my threads.
BTW, did you read that book I recommended you?:confused:
and by the way, you should change the title of this thread. Its not called hashing, it's called encrypting.
Another thing, NT doesn't use a "one way encryption" method. All encryption is 2-way. If it was 1-way, then it'll take an awfully long time for you to log on. :) :D ;) :p
Hey, instead of racking your post count even more.. why not edit your last remark
Why not use 1-way? When you change your password, it's hashed and stored. To verify, what you supply is hashed and checked if it matches what's stored. This way you cannot get the original password.
Rivest's very robust Message Digest 5 is available as a freebie .dll at:
http://www.net-security.org/various/...09,5468,.shtml
It is a very secure one-way hashing algorithm suitable for password hashing, and the .dll comes with instructions.
:)
MD5 has, to all intents and purposes, been cracked.
Then can you point me to a program that will crack any md5 hashed password within a short time?Quote:
Originally posted by parksie
MD5 has, to all intents and purposes, been cracked.
If you put it that way, RSA has also been cracked, but it takes ages to decypher the info, just like md5.
I wasn't saying not to use it, because the crack algorithm was only recently found and I don't think it can be done quickly. The thing was, before this there weren't any useful ways of cracking MD5.
It's still quite secure, just not very secure.
There is a problem of perception here.
MD5 is more than secure enough to warrant use for any reasonable app. For National security, where the potential damage is perhaps being obliterated by some maniac country, then yeah, don't use MD5.
But who is stupid enough to use 100+ hours on a Cray at a cost of $2500/hr compute time to crack a single password on a Diablo II disk that costs $50? This isn't even remotely practical.
If you want to rule the world then spending millions on cracking hashed passwrods is worth it. Cracking a single MS Office disk for $US250,00 is absurd. To say the least.
why don't use just use SHA-1 hashing?
In case you missed it,
it seems vb5prog has been a little busy. But,
No offense intended
SHA-1, MD5
EiSecure, et all, he just wanted to know about
how Windows NT takes the password
Alternatives are good, but it seems to be a waste of time when
the poster hasn't come back yet to process the first responses.
Lets wait and see what he comes back with.
-Lou
if you can tell me how to take a string such as "passport" and hash it exactly like windowsNT makeing it look something like "1A3F35A7B1C8D9E" on and on it stops at 34 characters i believe . Screw cracking it who needs to crack it when you can do this
use NT's own hashing algorithm to match other hashes
Administrator:1F4B82B96E6F9A1F4B82B96E6F9A
brute forcing.....
passing = 2B96E6F9A1F4B82B96E6FBC
passport = 1F4B82B96E6F9A1F4B82B96E6F9A
try to understand
then if the hash for passport = password hash then
password = passport
run through a dictionary file and hash the passwords in real time and then compare them to the aquired hashes
find and run L0phtCrack
yes there is ^ zero instead of an O
you might understand