Shaggy, I saw this and immediately thought of you: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...=feeds-newsxml No joke.
Printable View
Shaggy, I saw this and immediately thought of you: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...=feeds-newsxml No joke.
Now that would suit me down to the ground if it just had a qwerty keyboard. Calls and SMS is all I want but I want the SMS to be easy.
I don't want SMS, either. It sure looks like the phone may not be available on this side of the pond, but I certainly like the looks of it. That kind of battery life is just what I want.
Yeah, looks that way unfortunately.
Quote:
The Nokia 105 sadly won't come to the U.S. because it's incompatible with our networks, missing any frequency bands we use. But I hope Nokia reconsiders; I think a well-built, inexpensive voice phone could find a home in every nation.
I'm not sure about the 301 model though. It boasts similar battery performance, and has more functionality, but it's pricier than the $20 105. http://techreviewinfo.com/nokia-301-...-release-date/
It's good to see.
iPhone. Enough said.
They made an iPhone with just basic phone and text functions with a battery that lasts a month?Quote:
Originally Posted by moonman239