[RESOLVED] How can I refresh a treeview with new nodes without clearing then reloading the tree

Hi Guys,

How can I do the above. When I add new nodes to my treeview I call the original LoadTree Sub to clear then reload the tree. How can I refresh it without doing that as it is very time consuming to have to reopen sub categories in the tree.

You don't have to clear and reload everything - if you know parent node then what's the problem with adding new child?

Hi Guys,

Could someone please drop me an example. I add a new node to the tree but how do I get the new node to be visible immediately. Currently, I add a node then call a sub to reload the tree which involves clearing all the nodes and then loading them from a table in my database.

I hope you'll figure it out how to apply this quick sample to your aplication:

Code:

---

Option Explicit

Private Sub Form_Load()
    With TreeView1
        .Style = tvwTreelinesPlusMinusText
        .Nodes.Add , , "root", "Root"
        .Nodes.Add "root", tvwChild, "parent1", "Parent 1"
        .Nodes.Add "parent1", tvwChild, "child1", "Child 1"
        .Nodes.Add "parent1", tvwChild, "child2", "Child 2"
        .Nodes("root").Expanded = True
    End With
    Command1.Caption = "Add New Child Node"
End Sub

Private Sub Command1_Click()
    AddNewChildNode TreeView1, "parent1", "child" & TreeView1.Nodes.Count + 1, "Child " & TreeView1.Nodes("parent1").Children + 1
End Sub

Public Sub AddNewChildNode(tv As TreeView, parentnode As String, nodekey As String, nodetext As String)
    With tv
        .Nodes.Add parentnode, tvwChild, nodekey, nodetext
        .Nodes(parentnode).Expanded = True
    End With
End Sub

---

Hi RhinoBull,

Thanks alot for the example. I just did this a few minutes ago.

Code:

---

Set nd = frmItemManager.trvTree.Nodes.Add("c" & TreeRel, tvwChild, "i" & LastId, Trim(txtNewItemTypeName.Text))
    nd.ForeColor = &H400000
    nd.Bold = True
    nd.EnsureVisible

---

It does what I want it to do now. Can you please verify that I am on the right track.:afrog:

Syntax wise posted code looks fine - whether it does what you need it to do you are the one to verify.

Regards.