Determine Time on Someone Else’s Web Server

Hi,

I want to be able to check the time on a web server (not my own) to launch browsers (and pages on that site) at a specific time, according to THAT server's clock.

There IS a way to do it:

1) Use URLDownloadToFile API to download the page source code from the home page (which has a clock on it), this API writes the text to a file.

2) Open said file, find the tags that surround the time text, use Mid() to extract the value.

3) Determine the difference (in seconds) between the two times.

4) Using a timer, update using my system's time plus the difference.

That's seems pretty round-about. Who knows how much lag-time could occur. Then there is also a problem using DateAdd() when the server time hits midnight. The DateAdd() result keeps the PM and sets the hour to zero-one ( i.e., “01:00:00 PM” rather than 00:00:00 AM). But that's a secondary issue.

Is there a more efficient way of obtaining and maintaining the server's time? Milliseconds are not important, but seconds are.

Keep in mind that some of my users will still be using dial-up. IF there is a way to ping the server regularly for its time, will there be a dramatic hit on bandwidth?

Suggestions, please?

This seems like it would be a relatively easy thing to do. Someone must know how to do it.

So I'm bumping it. :bigyello:

I really could use some help with this. Anyone out there?

Here are two links that show you two different methods, the first uses SNTP protocol, the second HTTP protocol.

Link #1: http://vbnet.mvps.org/index.html?cod...cksynctime.htm

Link #2: http://brigsoft.com/atomic-clock-syn...cVbArticle.htm

You can use NetRemoteTOD API to get server time info

NetRemoteTOD seems to only work on NT servers within your network, not for servers on the Internet. Link #2 appears to only read Universal Time from an atomic clock site. Apparently it (the site) is sent up to supply the time when asked for. In my case, I don't have that luxury.

I'm still looking into Link #1 though it appears to have the same limitation as Link #2.

Thanks for looking into this form me. Ideas and/or clarification is appreciated!!!!