Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Try mounting the drive manually using mount from the console.
I think it would be something like... (at your own risk)
mount -t nfs -o ro bsp27:/u2 /bsp27_u2
See if that gives you the same result.
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Yep, that does exactly the same thing. I also loathe you for the fact that your advice made me type "man mount"!
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
"man touch" is also most amusing.
What is the native filesystem on the drive that you are mounting? Its not NTFS by any chance is it?
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Nah, it's HTFS (SCO specific file system) but it mounts with the correct options on an older redhat box which is why it puzzles me.
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Maybe the -n option may be of use (with the mount command). Other than that, this is out of my depth mate.
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Nah, -n relates to when the fstab file is on an ro file system. Thanks for trying tho - a bit ouf of my depth too, which sucks given that I'm the sysadmin :p Linux file systems I'm fine with but SCO is a strange scary world with lots of badly documented stuff....
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSurfer
Yeah, I know it should go in the General PC forum, but anyway:
Does anyone know why, when I have explicitly included
ro in the /etc/fstab options, SuSE Linux 10.1 should still be mounting an NFS file system as rwxrwxrwx?
Sample /etc/fstab entry:
VB Code:
bsp27:/u2 /bsp27_u2 nfs ro,nosuid,noexec 0 0
Ignore the permissions of the mount directory. Try writing to a file beneath the mount point and it should fail.
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Aha! You are in fact absolutely correct!! Well done that man! What a bloody stupid idea that is, listing a read only dir as having full permissions!!
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Man, I was having the same problem just a little while ago. :P
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Is this just Need For Speed? or the New NFS Most wanted?
NFS:Carbon is coming soon!! woot!