Mixing and matching fonts is bad, mmkay?
BTW, It doesn't require either Flash or Internet Explorer. I'm sitting here with Portable Firefox and I refuse to install Flash. The site works, just no animations. I saw the links at the bottom of the front page, but they are a bit small and squished together.
Now the review -
First impressions are bad to start, since I dont have Flash. But never mind that. I found the Home link alright. Text looks a bit squished though. And like you didn't set a font.
Home page looks like one of the thousands of PHP-Nuke templates around. Circuit board with random shapes and hard edges sawn out look has been done before. Many, many, times.
Blue links - looks like you didn't set a colour there. Hard to read against your background. BTW, long dark to light gradients do not work. I have a dodgy laptop monitor - it looks baaad. You can avoid this by using only slight gradients, never a huge drawn out change in colour. Keep the styling consistent, have a couple of main colours plus a tint colour, etc. At the moment the main title and the newsposts titles do not match. Looks as if you copy and pasted the news posts image from somewhere else.
Now the posts themselves. They seem to be floating in the middle of nowhere, particularly at the top of the page above the background gradient. Need to integrate their look more into the rest of the page. Titles are hard to read, and the dates alone meaningless, especially in the all-numeric format you've used. Top post says to me 4th of October 2006. Change it so it uses the month name to avoid confusion like this. Give each post a headline. And change the font colour, or background - Black on dark blue is very hard to read.
The line spacing at the top and bottom of each post is inconsistent. Some have a blank line at the top but not the bottom, others one at the bottom, and others both.
Collapsable posts are neat, but poorly implemented. There is nothing suggesting that you can collapse them and I found it completely by accident (I was checking for tables by Ctrl+clicking, a Firefox trick to select a table cell).
Random lines at the bottom of the page? Looks odd. And the only way to navigate to another page (in my Flash-less state) is the tiny links at the bottom. Evil.
Now the Portfolio. It's grim and dark. I can't read it. Next.
Resume - Again, can't read a thing. Waaay to dark. And the font size is too small within the table.
Same goes for Contact page - too dark again.
Overall - For someone that lists HTML and CSS under their programming languages, it looks like a first attempt at using Photoshop and Frontpage. The table layout - I could forgive that if you had not listed CSS, but to do both screams incompetency. The visual design is terrible, can't read the content, which is the whole purpose of the site. And Flash objects on the front page and main title without fallback replacements - bad.
Verdict - Rubbish. With tg - Next!
Do take our suggestions seriously though. I gave up in the last thread because all you seemed to want to do was argue. Trust me, after a while of doing this sort of thing, you eventually learn how counter-productive that is.
On the design front, if you're short for ideas (I suck at coming up with design ideas) check out this site:
bwdow.com. Most of them are fairly out there, but there are some neat looks.
- P