Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
C# requires the Net Framework installed in order to run, and produces a nasty message if it isn't. This may not be a problem in the future as more computers are going to be using it.
Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
Thanks,
One more thing in C++ u dont need the runfiles right.
Thanks again
Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
Not in C++ no. But in C++.NET you still need the .NET framework.
- ØØ -
Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoteMe
Not in C++ no. But in C++.NET you still need the .NET framework.
- ØØ -
ah even if you dont use any managed classes?
Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
Then it isn't C++ .NET...:)
Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
hmm so if you compile something non-.NET with vs2003, it will run on older comps? vs2003 didnt update any c++ libraries? (I totally dont know anything about the world of c++ as you can guess;) )
Re: Moving from VB6 To VC#
Correct. If you don't use the .NET framework in C++, then you don't have to redistrebute them. Just like for me when I do DirectX. If I use DX then I have to distrebute the runtimes just in case. But if I don't use DX then I don't have to distribute the runtimes..:)
- ØØ -