Printable View
Hey,
I have a laptop with processor Centrino 1.6 Ghz and I am programming a VB.Net (ADO.Net) and have a back connection to Access. The connection is very slow.
Can anyone tell me if I get laptop with a multi-threading Pentium4 Processor will help?? Thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by angelica
if you mean that youre acces backend is not on youre laptop, then it's not gonna help you an bit.
I guess the slow connection is youre bottleneck, but you can always buy an other laptop and donate this one to me for the advise :D
I highly doubt a faster CPU will solve your problem.
I've moved this to the General Pc Forum, i feel you may get a better responce here :)
let me explain my problem well. At the moment I only have one connection running. I am connecting to Access on my computer as a localhost. When I rebuild the solution and get a connection this is very slow. Thus a hyper-threading CPU with a better speed help? I mean a Intel Pentium 4 with 3.0G give me a faster connection??
No. This sounds like a network bottleneck.
He's using access via localhost. He's doing it internally which means it doesn't leave his NIC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Sell
As to the poster, I have no idea. It might help or maybe there is a leak or some obscure bug or something you forgot to do. I don't know VB.Net and/or access very well.
I stand corrected.Quote:
Originally Posted by kasracer
If its running off the localhost, I'd say its an issue with your code...
i have a somewhat similar problem. as the program connects for the first time, there is a considerable lag before the adodc form opens. once it is connected, all is good.
She is using ADO.NET, there is no adodc control.Quote:
Originally Posted by dglienna
What are you using for your connection - OLEDbConnection, ODBCConnection, etc.
Also are you sure its just the connection thats slow or some loading of data through a OLEDbDataAdapter, OLEDbCommand, or ???
Can you post some relevant code?
What version are you running VB.NET 2002, 2003, or 2005 beta?
How much ram do you have? 256 is not enough to happily run XP in my experience.
I just upgraded to 640 and there have been huge efficiency gains all round.
But it does sound most likely to be a network bottleneck as mentioned above.