Yikes....not sure where to start on this one. Is that review for real?? Tell that was freebie, cuz it wasn't even worth that much...
First and foremost, Sandra needs to be punched in the neck for that material. That review was one of the most useless, unprofessional, and completely meaningless documents I've ever seen. Out of 23,075 words(ya, that's 123 pages), only 338 words could actually be considered part of the "site review"...well, sort of. Somehow she worked in
her opinion of Magiaus' worth as far as salary potential, which, the last time I checked, has nothing to do a site review. The other 22,737 words are the output from whatever tool was improperly used to perform the analysis.
Now perhaps there may be other documents left out, but you don't throw figures around like that without some sort of qualification, like, um, where she got the numbers from(I'm referring to her assessment of the site value).
I like the part where she lists all the data, ya that's pages 3 through 123(and page 1 was title of this "thing"). I wonder if anyone has actually read through all 123 pages...the customer? ya right.
She indicates that she ran tests on 378 fiiles. Yet funnily enough, if you look at the list of files she reviewed, there are quite a few appearing in that strange
_vti_cnf directory...Somebody needs to brush up on Front Page extensions, and get a tool that know's about them as well.
Browser support. Always a sticky issue. I
validated the front page, not so bad, 14 errors[at the time of this posting]. I use Firefox and didn't have a problem viewing the site. Also
validated the vendors login page, 19 errors, none of which affected my use of the site. So the site isn't so friendly with Netscape 2.0 or Opera 2.1 or IE 3.0...SO WHAT, you've just counted out 3 people, none of which are prolly gonna be doing business with that site.
I can prolly go on for a while, but I'll spare the thread. Cool site though. I want a "Crap Cap" with my name on it.