Printable View
Self Explanitory, who do you think flames the best? When a dumb question arises who is there to make ppl feal the dumbest? Who doesnt hold back words?
I got a few in mind:
1:Cid(in me early days)
2:Intelsucks(makes grown men cry)
3:Corona Beer(new, but he can flame. not as good as me of course ;) )
Any one else have any better suggestions?
el oh el
I dunno, mendhak will put a hurting on you :)
This thread belongs in the world events forum. Funny - none of you guys have ever made me cry :D
Stupid thread you lousy **ck ****er. Eat **** and die, mother ****er. If I see you on the street, I'll rip your ****ing head off and **** down your neck.
Oh, and Cid, you're the biggest flamer on VbForums, so you win. Now, go sew or something.
;)
I invented e-murder, you speak, I stomp you to the floor.
ZZZ, You arent even close to being the best. Martin Liss is a better flamer than youQuote:
Originally posted by CORONA BEER
I invented e-murder, you speak, I stomp you to the floor.
Wow, i have heard of women faking it but jeeezze :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by demotivater
Stupid thread you lousy **ck ****er. Eat **** and die, mother ****er. If I see you on the street, I'll rip your ****ing head off and **** down your neck.
Oh, and Cid, you're the biggest flamer on VbForums, so you win. Now, go sew or something.
;)
Ah, but he is a better programmer than you so were even.Quote:
Originally posted by cid
ZZZ, You arent even close to being the best. Martin Liss is a better flamer than you
I'm sure you have, first hand no doubtQuote:
Originally posted by cid
Wow, i have heard of women faking it but jeeezze :rolleyes:
hahaQuote:
Originally posted by demotivater
I'm sure you have, first hand no doubt
There is an art to flaming. It is closely related to being rude but the trick is not to let the flamee know he's being flamed.
The flamer should use subtlety and poise to accomplish his goal of discrediting and humiliating his mark.
Few people can do it well. Those proficient in the art tend not to refer to it directly, at least not in polite conversation, unless when offering advice regarding its prosecution. Past flames are between the flamer and flamee and should not be referred to except as a tie break in a heated discussion in isolated company.
Thus the forums (sic. fora) remain a peaceful and polite haven of intellectual growth and fortitude.
A truly great flamer would never stoop to "leet speak" to convey his argument, instead preferring to ply his opinion using eloquence and wit. If you would like any further information please contact me at the following email address.
[email protected]
:D
What is a flamer? Are you people flaming now?
Geezze its hot around here :D
I'd stick to two short planks if I were you ... :)Quote:
Originally posted by wossname
There is an art to flaming. It is closely related to being rude but the trick is not to let the flamee know he's being flamed.
The flamer should use subtlety and poise to accomplish his goal of discrediting and humiliating his mark.
Few people can do it well. Those proficient in the art tend not to refer to it directly, at least not in polite conversation, unless when offering advice regarding its prosecution. Past flames are between the flamer and flamee and should not be referred to except as a tie break in a heated discussion in isolated company.
Thus the forums (sic. fora) remain a peaceful and polite haven of intellectual growth and fortitude.
A truly great flamer would never stoop to "leet speak" to convey his argument, instead preferring to ply his opinion using eloquence and wit. If you would like any further information please contact me at the following email address.
[email protected]
:D
Yes, you seem to have done well enough.
how's the handbag business?
Your father is my best customer. Tell him those earrings don't go with his tank-top.Quote:
Originally posted by Wally Pipp
how's the handbag business?
ah dad, always fancied lovely ladies behind the counter ....
He has fine taste. Hope his ankle is ok now. I told him he shouldn't wear 6" heels at his age.
and you should know :)
Exhausted your shallow pool of wit have you?
No, merely exhausted my interest in tapping into that pool of wit to come up with a decent retort. Could do but can't be arsed. :)
I'm better than you. :p
nerny nerny nerrr.
You guys are off track, this is a thread about who is the best. Consider it a passive poll. You elect your own delegate. This is not a post of who can flame the best, but merely who would you elect to be the best.
I vote for: Cid;)
Forgive me for not knowing what flaming is - but surely you cannot vote for yourself :confuseed:Quote:
Originally posted by cid
You guys are off track, this is a thread about who is the best. Consider it a passive poll. You elect your own delegate. This is not a post of who can flame the best, but merely who would you elect to be the best.
I vote for: Cid;)
Fine new rule:
Can not elect your self as a delegate!
Vote is recast: intelsucks:wave:
Here comes the steriler :thumb: