I keep comming up with the same answer for this problem. :confused: 4/x2 + 4x - (2 / x2 - 4x) --> 2x -24 / (x+4)(x-4). My book has 2x -24 / x(x+4)(x-4). Anybody for a quick check? Thanks. :D
Printable View
I keep comming up with the same answer for this problem. :confused: 4/x2 + 4x - (2 / x2 - 4x) --> 2x -24 / (x+4)(x-4). My book has 2x -24 / x(x+4)(x-4). Anybody for a quick check? Thanks. :D
I was bored... so...
I made my ti-92 solve them against eachother for x.
Your equation yields 4 answers, while the book's answer only yields two answers.
But they are equal in a sense that a solution can be derived from both when set equal to the original polynomial.
When having the ti-92 factor the original, I get:
(2(4x^3+1))/x^2
And simplifies to:
8x+2/x^2
So what kind of question wants a partially simplified solution?
That's silly. :lol:
I had a quiz where the question was to find the factors of 6!/3! or something.
I thought the question was stupid because it has so many possible factors, how far should I go??? (I got it wrong, of course :rolleyes: )
Since 6!/3! is 120, don't you just have to find the factors of that then? 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12...
What is fairly interesting (yeh, rite) is finding the factors of 20032003... no better yet, find the factors of that number which are perfect squares.
I must be having a mental block, but what are perfect squares?
Don't know the formal definition, but its basically any number whose square root is an integer, eg 4,9,16,25,36,etc.Quote:
Originally posted by Acidic
I must be having a mental block, but what are perfect squares?
I forget the exact wording (it was in french anyways) but the point was to simplify it from
6!/3!
to
6*5*4*3*2*1
------------------
3*2*1
to
6*5*4
and if you had anything else it was wrong
I was wrong. 2x -24 / x(x+4)(x-4) is in fact the correct answer. :blush:
4 / x2 + 4x - 2 / x2 - 4x
4(x2 - 4x) - 2(x2 + 4x) / (x2+ 4x)(x2 - 4x)
2x2 - 24x / (x2+ 4x)(x2 - 4x)
2x(x - 12) / x2(x + 4)(x - 4)
2(x - 12) / x(x + 4)( x - 4) --> 2x - 24 / x(x + 4)(x - 4)
I must have originally factored the denom wrong.
The corect breakdown should be --> (x2 + 4x)(x2 - 4x) --> x(x + 4)x(x - 4) --> x2(x + 4)(x - 4) --> x2(x2 - 16) --> x4 - 16x2 --> (x2 + 4x)(x2 - 4x)