Multithreaded Socket Server

Hi,

I have created a multi threaded socket server. But it is not behaving like one..

See the following code

Code:

---

/*Creating a Mutex*/
hSocketMutex = CreateMutex( NULL, FALSE, "SocketMutex" );
        printf("%s: waiting for data on port TCP %u\n",module,SERVER_PORT);
        for(;;)
        {
                cliLen = sizeof(sdstruct.cliAddr);       
                sdstruct.newSd = accept(sdstruct.sd, (struct sockaddr *) &sdstruct.cliAddr, &cliLen);
                if(sdstruct.newSd<0)
                {
                        perror("cannot accept connection ");
                        return 0;
                }                       
/*Once a client requests I pass that socket structure to the Thread function which will handle that client request*/

                hSock = CreateThread (NULL, 0,AcceptConnection, (LPVOID)&sdstruct, 0, &dwThreadId);
        }

---

In the thread function..

Code:

---

DWORD WINAPI AcceptConnection(LPVOID lsock)
{
        DWORD iRetVal;
        SOCKET_STRUCT psock;
        hSocketMutex= OpenMutex( SYNCHRONIZE, FALSE, "SocketMutex" );
        iRetVal = WaitForSingleObject(hSocketMutex, INFINITE );
        if( iRetVal == WAIT_FAILED )
        {
                printf("WAIT_FAILED\n");
                return 0;
        }
        else if( iRetVal == WAIT_TIMEOUT )
        {
                printf("WAIT_TIMEOUT\n");
                return 0;
        }
        else if( iRetVal == WAIT_OBJECT_0 )
        {
                printf("WAIT_OBJECT_0\n");
        }
        psock = (SOCKET_STRUCT)lsock;
        memset(args,0,COM_ARGS);
        if(GetParams(args,psock.newSd)>0)
        {
                strcpy(com_dat,args);
                printf("%d\n",psock.newSd);
                printf("%s: received from %s:TCP%d : %s\n\n", module,inet_ntoa(sdstruct.cliAddr.sin_addr),ntohs(sdstruct.cliAddr.sin_port), args);
                memset(args,0,COM_ARGS);   
                ProcessData(psock.newSd);
        }
        /*else
        {
                printf("Command not received\n");
        }*/
        ReleaseMutex(hSocketMutex);
        CloseHandle(hSocketMutex);
        return 1;
}

---

Since I am using a Mutex though the client requested is accepted, it is served after the previous thread releases the Mutex.

All I want to know is how to overcome this.

If I dont create the mutex lock then there will be a clash of local/global variables..

Please let me know If there is a better method.

Thanks,
Pradeep

Remove global variables. Local (stack) variables are thread-safe anyway. Learn about TLS (Thread Local Storage).

Hae Thanks,

I too found that when I printed the address of the local variable in the thread... they were different..

How can I pass the connfd of the accept call from the server to the thread..

I guess in the thread I will do..

Code:

---

SOCKET lSock;

memcpy(lSock,connfd,sizeof(SOCKET));

---

Can I do this.. By doing this can I forget the MUTEX and go further..

Thanks,
Pradeep

Make a single global SOCKET variable. Have a global autoreset event. When your main thread gets a response, let it set the SOCKET to the connection, spawn (or wake) the handler thread and wait for the event. The handler gets the SOCKET into its own memory (away from the global) and fires the event.

Sounds good to me.

Hi,

I have two solutions.. Tell me which one is better..

1)

Code:

---


main()
{
SOCKET con;
    for( ; ; )
    {
      con = accept();
      thread(con);
           
    }
}


thread(SOCKET aSoc)
{
SOCKET tSoc;
char * Data;
tSoc = aSoc;

      getData(&Data);
      for( ; Data != NULL; )
      {
              send(tSoc,Data);
      }
     
      close(tSoc);

}

---

Is this OK.. Any way I will try this..

Other one is..

Code:

---


SOCKET gSoc[50];

main()
{
    for( ; ; )
    {
        index = GetFreeSocket();
        gSoc[index] = accept();
        thread (index);
    }
   
}
thread( int index)
{
//Process..

close[gSoc[index]);
}

---

Which is better.. ?

Thanks,
Pradeep

The first. Cast the SOCKET to an LPVOID to pass it. If you cannot (because of differnent sizes, I have no idea what a SOCKET is) or you don't want to, and you decide to pass by reference instead you MUST add synchronization of some sort.

Hi,

This is what I have done now...
Looks fine.. Have not done a regressive testing..

Code:

---

void main()
{
        SOCKET connfd;
        HANDLE tHwnd;
          DWORD dwThreadId;
                InitSocket(); // Finction to Init  ....
          for(;;)
          { 
                 
                int size = sizeof(theiraddr);

                  connfd = accept ( sockfd , (struct sockaddr *) &theiraddr ,&size );
                if ( connfd < 0 )
                { 
                          printf("connection error\n");
                        break;
                  } 

                tHwnd = CreateThread( NULL, 0, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)MyFuncThread, (LPVOID)connfd, 0, &dwThreadId );
                  if( tHwnd == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE )
                  { 
                          printf("Error %ld\n",GetLastError());
                  } 
                  CloseHandle(tHwnd);

                      /* Function to be added */
                       
        }
}       

void MyFuncThread(LPVOID aCon)
{
        SOCKET con;
          con = (SOCKET)aCon;

        char dynPort[255];
        char NewProcess[255];
       
        memset(dynPort,0,sizeof(dynPort));
        memset(NewProcess,0,sizeof(NewProcess));
        sprintf(dynPort,"9980");

        x++;

        printf("%d - %s\n",x,dynPort);
       
        int nw = send(con ,dynPort,sizeof(dynPort),0);
         
          if( nw < 0 )
        { 
                  printf("error at write\n");
                  closesocket(con );
          } 
        Sleep(200);
        closesocket(con );
        x--;


}

---

Looks good.

Hae CornedBee,

Got a question..

If I have a Thread.. which calls some function... which in turn calls some other function..

Code:

---

main()
{
      CreateThread(ThreadFunction);
}
ThreadFunction()
{
        function1();
}
function1()
{
        function2();
}

---

If the main creates 'n' threads.. will there be any clash when same functions are called by different threads... ?..

I guess I am asking something sensible..

Thanks,
Pradeep

The functions themselves do not clash. Local variables are separate for all threads.
Code that uses static or global variables, however, might clash.

Hae.. thankx...

Its running fine now......

Well I will let you know the status..

I am trying to make a RSH Daemon and Client ..
To Communicate from Unix to Windows..

Unix (Client)
Windows Server..

Thanks,
Pradeep

No idea what RSH is (remote shell?), but good luck!

Yes...

Now its working great... :)

Thankx...


Pradeep