It's not the first time I do a serch for the "For Each", but now it's time for a rant. Until when must I wait for you guys to do something about it? :(
Printable View
It's not the first time I do a serch for the "For Each", but now it's time for a rant. Until when must I wait for you guys to do something about it? :(
Well if you refer to the FAQ you'll see that you must rack up at least 4 rants before something is looked at by the admins.
So just three more to go :)
... just kidding by the way ;)
I'll point it out to the admins.
Thank you. :)
Besides would you really want me to http://apolyton.net/forums/images/smilies/rantanim.gif 3 more times? :D
Try searching on "*For Each*" without the quotes.
I find it hard to believe that in all these years since the forum is alive the only times the cycle For Each has been talked about was in only 7 threads...
But thanks for the tip, it's better than nothing. :)
...but not enough.
A search for "foreach" (without quotes) yeilds 75 threads or 106 posts. "*for each*" yields just a few.
Brad!
That's nice Brad, but if you check many of those threads, you'll notice taht the users are either talking about C# or made the typo and wrote foreach without a space inbetween. But my problem is that the search function still doesn't detect VB code snipets with the For Each cycle.
Using For...Each generated 31 threads with 25 for General VBQuestions.