Estimates from the pentagon say that we have killed approximately 100,000 Iraqi soldiers. America has lost approximately 40 soldiers in combat, Brittain around 20... and they say the war isn't going well...:rolleyes:
Printable View
Estimates from the pentagon say that we have killed approximately 100,000 Iraqi soldiers. America has lost approximately 40 soldiers in combat, Brittain around 20... and they say the war isn't going well...:rolleyes:
And Australia has lost zero! Yeah baby. :)
The cameraman doesn't count ;)
The main reason the brits are losing so many troops is because of the Iraqis. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Pc_Madness
And Australia has lost zero! Yeah baby. :)
The cameraman doesn't count ;)
That is a quotable statement. I like it.Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
The main reason the brits are losing so many troops is because of the Iraqis. :rolleyes:
Errr.... so what are the yanks loosing their men to then? :confused:
US dead is now at 80 ;)
I was talking about the Brits. :rolleyes: The Americas have lost about 90% of their casualties to frendly fire and the other 10% to the Iraqis.Quote:
Originally posted by Pc_Madness
Errr.... so what are the yanks loosing their men to then? :confused:
US dead is now at 80 ;)
Nice to see you seem to get so much enjoyment out of suffering and death. Why not keep a high score?
NOT FUNNY :mad: I was simply answering his question.Quote:
Originally posted by DeadEyes
Nice to see you seem to get so much enjoyment out of suffering and death. Why not keep a high score?
It wasn't meant to be funny!
The idea of a war going well only exists if you don't care for the people who are suffering.
such statements show total disregard for peoples lives.Quote:
The cameraman doesn't count
So that's something to be proud of is it ?Quote:
Originally posted by Arc
Estimates from the pentagon say that we have killed approximately 100,000 Iraqi soldiers. America has lost approximately 40 soldiers in combat, Brittain around 20... and they say the war isn't going well...:rolleyes:
That your vastly technologically superior army can massacre and rain destruction down from above on an inferior military force.
Three cheers for the americans and such a courageous victory.
I agree. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by DeadEyes
It wasn't meant to be funny!
The idea of a war going well only exists if you don't care for the people who are suffering.
such statements show total disregard for peoples lives.
Why don't you whip up a score keeping prog and sell it over the net ? Could make you a bundle, who knows eh ?
Might even be a best seller ...
:D
Too little gloating on that site. I doubt if Arc would find it 'interesting' enough ...
WOOHOOOO!!! I killed around 100,000 in a war I have been fighting in my back yard. I will admit it this war was over oil. The spill cup from my BBQ overflowed onto my patio leaving 3 tabelspoons of pure Black Angus porter-house steak oil laying unclaimed. My territory was invaded by terrorist ants intending to steal my oil. I promptly attacked using a "shock and awe strategy" . My war strategy consisted of an airal bombardment of black flag incecticide, the bottoms of my shoes, and a rolled up copy of the Seattle Times. My closest ally "Starlen" a German Shepherd spearheaded the ground attack on the western flank literally licking up the enemy.
Score
Me: 100,000 little ant basterds
Ants: 0
Umm, British have been killed by US Friendly fire.Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
I was talking about the Brits. :rolleyes: The Americas have lost about 90% of their casualties to frendly fire and the other 10% to the Iraqis.
Really? that would be more sensible, but its more down to being attacked by US A4s, and missiles, and dodgy pilots who moan about flying in sand when they are trained (or are supposed to be) to fly in zero vis :/Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
The main reason the brits are losing so many troops is because of the Iraqis. :rolleyes:
Your analogy to this current war would mean that Iraq ran this "Shock and Awe" (which is a stupid typical American name) "campaign" and wipped out the invading armies (UK/US)Quote:
Originally posted by MasterBlaster
WOOHOOOO!!! I killed around 100,000 in a war I have been fighting in my back yard. I will admit it this war was over oil. The spill cup from my BBQ overflowed onto my patio leaving 3 tabelspoons of pure Black Angus porter-house steak oil laying unclaimed. My territory was invaded by terrorist ants intending to steal my oil. I promptly attacked using a "shock and awe strategy" . My war strategy consisted of an airal bombardment of black flag incecticide, the bottoms of my shoes, and a rolled up copy of the Seattle Times. My closest ally "Starlen" a German Shepherd spearheaded the ground attack on the western flank literally licking up the enemy.
Score
Me: 100,000 little ant basterds
Ants: 0
:p
It is a typical US media nickname. Most Americans find it a ridiculous as the rest of the world. I apologize my weekend war did not completly comply with the events in currently happening in Iraq. Ants are sneakey little basterds and cannot be trusted to make for a good monday morning story.Quote:
Originally posted by chenko2
Your analogy to this current war would mean that Iraq ran this "Shock and Awe" (which is a stupid typical American name) "campaign" and wipped out the invading armies (UK/US)
:p
Thats what I meant. Dont take it as an offence, its my hobby to find flaws in analogies ;)Quote:
Originally posted by MasterBlaster
It is a typical US media nickname. Most Americans find it a ridiculous as the rest of the world. I apologize my weekend war did not completly comply with the events in currently happening in Iraq. Ants are sneakey little basterds and cannot be trusted to make for a good monday morning story.
Well, first of all i never said anything about being "proud" of it, i was merely giving a refrence to how well the Coalition is doing, because alot of people are trying to say that the war is stalled, or it's not going as planned etc..etc.. I think those numbers show something completely different.Quote:
Originally posted by plenderj
So that's something to be proud of is it ?
That your vastly technologically superior army can massacre and rain destruction down from above on an inferior military force.
Three cheers for the americans and such a courageous victory.
But actually now that you mention it, i am proud of America's armed forces. Even though we do have superior technology we are doing an amazing job against these iraqi forces. Especialy when you consider the tactics the iraqis are using. Holding up children in front of them as they shoot at us, hiding in mosc's, hospital's and school's shooting at us, faking surrender then shooting at us, acting as civialians then car bombing us etc..
And let's not forget, America/UK have to win 2 wars. While taking out the Iraqi forces we also have to show the islamic world that we are not purposely killing innocent people and destroying thier mosc's, schools's,hospital's,baby milk factories etc.. This is very hard to do when every day the iraqi and other islamic countries people are being force-fed propganda lies. Just as you and others buy right into thier propaganda i'm sure so do the islamic militant people around the world. "Look how terrible the American's are they shot women and children!" Let's just leave off the bit about how we forced the driver to run the checkpoint by threating to torue and kill his whole family:rolleyes:
I was responding to a question posted by Pc_Madness about the Yanks. Of course I know that the Americans have killed the Brits aswell. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by chenko2
Umm, British have been killed by US Friendly fire.
At least the Brits and Aussies question the targets before firing at them. :rolleyes:Quote:
Really? that would be more sensible, but its more down to being attacked by US A4s, and missiles, and dodgy pilots who moan about flying in sand when they are trained (or are supposed to be) to fly in zero vis :/
Well let's not forget that the UK are in charge of Basra while the U.S. is in charge of the entire rest country. Since we are flying 1,000's more sorties per day i would expect a mistake.
It doesn't boil down to the U.S. doesn't look where it's shooting:rolleyes:
I said they should question the target before firing. :rolleyes:Quote:
It doesn't boil down to the U.S. doesn't look where it's shooting:rolleyes:
Yah and? That's what i am saying. The U.S. Does question the target. I have seen in cocpit video tapes, it's no joke.Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
I said they should question the target before firing. :rolleyes:
haha, I could definately see that happening. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
I said they should question the target before firing. :rolleyes:
:rolleyes:Quote:
Pilot: Ahh, theres the target, better set her down
...After Landing...
Pilot: Excuse me Mr Target, are you the target? If you are, would you mind if I dropped a bomb on you?
Quote:
Originally posted by Pc_Madness
haha, I could definately see that happening. :rolleyes:
:rolleyes:
Ha ha I mean ask themselves if they think the target is a good guy or bad guy first.
having just woken up, upon reading this,images of Monty Python walking up to a group of enemy soldiers pop into mind...Quote:
Originally posted by Nightwalker83
At least the Brits and Aussies question the targets before firing at them. :rolleyes:
Excuse me, We are about to bomb you, and so, we are going to ask you a few questions...
not having had my first cup of coffee, I come to realize I am going nowhere with this, and so I stop.
;)
Quote:
Originally posted by NotLKH
having just woken up, upon reading this,images of Monty Python walking up to a group of enemy soldiers pop into mind...
Excuse me, We are about to bomb you, and so, we are going to ask you a few questions...
not having had my first cup of coffee, I come to realize I am going nowhere with this, and so I stop.
;)
Quote:
Ha ha I mean ask themselves if they think the target is a good guy or bad guy first.
Since when is the success of a war defined by amount of kills?Quote:
Originally posted by Arc
Estimates from the pentagon say that we have killed approximately 100,000 Iraqi soldiers. America has lost approximately 40 soldiers in combat, Brittain around 20... and they say the war isn't going well...:rolleyes:
How else do you think America won the Vietnam war?Quote:
Since when is the success of a war defined by amount of kills?
I don't know, I just thought it was all about oil and not to kill as many iraqi as possible.Quote:
Originally posted by MerrionComputin
How else do you think America won the Vietnam war?
Fewer of them to put their sand back on top of our oil?Quote:
I don't know, I just thought it was all about oil and not to kill as many iraqi as possible.
What you mean your oil? It's there oil and it will remain that way.Quote:
Originally posted by MerrionComputin
Fewer of them to put their sand back on top of our oil?
well yah it's thier oil, but technically it's our oil and it will remain that way.
No you get the Saddams head on a platter. :rolleyes: :pQuote:
Originally posted by Arc
well yah it's thier oil, but technically it's our oil and it will remain that way.
"Oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, hello girls, are you missing me? oil, oil, oil, oil, oil,!"Quote:
Originally posted by Arc
well yah it's thier oil, but technically it's our oil and it will remain that way.
http://www.vbforums.com/attachment.p...postid=1407310
Since when did America win the Vietnam war?? After hundreds of thousands of US soldiers had been killed, the army was pulled back, remember...Quote:
Originally posted by MerrionComputin
How else do you think America won the Vietnam war?
Oh, and when you're comparing victories to the amount of kills I think you've made the worst choice possible with Vietnam...
Number of communist party members <= number of McDonalds burgers consumed annually hence US victory.Quote:
Since when did America win the Vietnam war?? After hundreds of thousands of US soldiers had been killed, the army was pulled back, remember...
Get your facts straight bud, America lost around 40,000 soldiers.. the Vietnamese lost over 1 million.Quote:
Originally posted by TheVader
Since when did America win the Vietnam war?? After hundreds of thousands of US soldiers had been killed, the army was pulled back, remember...
Oh, and when you're comparing victories to the amount of kills I think you've made the worst choice possible with Vietnam...