I admit it.
I love C#, and am about to get VS.net, but I also want to be able to write plain c++. Not managed c++, just plain-ole, no .NET C++. Is it possible with VS.NET, or should I have VS 6 for this?
Thanks,
Carole
Printable View
I admit it.
I love C#, and am about to get VS.net, but I also want to be able to write plain c++. Not managed c++, just plain-ole, no .NET C++. Is it possible with VS.NET, or should I have VS 6 for this?
Thanks,
Carole
MS would be shot if they removed standard C++ from VS.NET =). In fact, the compiler is much closer to the standard then VC6, so I hear.
Z.
Yeah, that's true... but then, MS has been accused of doing such things as well.Quote:
Originally posted by Zaei
MS would be shot if they removed standard C++ from VS.NET =).
Thanks for the info.
It is :)Quote:
Originally posted by Zaei
MS would be shot if they removed standard C++ from VS.NET =). In fact, the compiler is much closer to the standard then VC6, so I hear.
Z.
Wonderfully, I wrote up a load of code with GCC 3.0.1 under Linux, then transferred it to VC7 and there were only two problems:
1. I'd used strcasecmp which is only on POSIX (equivalent of stricmp).
2. I'd missed some iterators where I should have had const_iterators (VC7 picked up on them where GCC didn't ;))
Hey wow! MS got something right!! Did they even get something "righter" than gnu??? :eek:
Just that one they did ;)
Although GCC whomps it for all sorts of template trickery which only a mother (or Kedaman) could love :D
parksie, have you got the thing to link and work in windows?
No :(
I tried getting it working under Cygwin but it was having trouble installing. It compiled ok, and I could actually run the compiler on something, but it was completely lost for all its paths, and went extremely strange :confused: