Why using DX & VB if you can use DarkBasic?
(Just a question...)
Printable View
Why using DX & VB if you can use DarkBasic?
(Just a question...)
please explain. I've seen darkbasic, but it seemed far too simplistic.
I tried it once, said HEY!, this looks pretty good.
Then I noticed there were no lights and you can't make use of Transform and Lighting.
DarkBasic crashed on every system i tried it on. Besides, it gives you far less freedom then C++ (or VB) and DX.
Z.
and darkbasic is not free as i remember..
OK, Darkbasic sucks. I also read on the site that we have to pay some licenses too.
Long live VB, not?
And C++ ;)
C++.
Z.
Aye, c++ is what ya need
Darkbasic sounds evill.....
Hm, let's check..
DarkBasic is evil http://fox.acky.net/vb/res/smiley666.gif (<- yup, indeed).
:)
OK, long live C++, but also: long live C, not?
The speed increase is very little if any, and object-oriented programming is a must nowadays :)
So I would say no, I don't think C is an option anymore except for speed junkie functions (eg. graphics routines)
C++ add a little extra overhead, but OOP and such outweights the cons.
Z.
...and HTML :)