|
-
Jul 15th, 2001, 10:52 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
The Great Rod Puzzle...
I'm gonna start a new thread on The Great Rod Puzzle. I'll post a question then wait for the answer, and then post an extension question &c...
So first up, really easy to start with:
1) Take a rod of length 2a. Break it into two pieces. What is the average (mean) length of each piece?
There are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary, and those that don't.
-
Jul 15th, 2001, 11:15 AM
#2
-
Jul 16th, 2001, 02:44 AM
#3
Fanatic Member
Lets see now:
suppose the rod is broken into two lengths of xa and ya, then
xa+ya=2a
therefore:
average length = (xa+ya)/2
replacing xa+ya :
average length = (2a)/2
average length = a
QED.
Martin J Wallace (Slaine)
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 05:03 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Part 2...
Well done.
Second question:
2)Take a rod of length 2a. Break it into two pieces. What is the average (mean) length of the shortest piece?
There are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary, and those that don't.
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 05:21 AM
#5
Frenzied Member
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 05:39 AM
#6
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
That was quick!...
Well done
3) Take 2 rods each of length 2a. Break both into two pieces. What is the average (mean) length of the shortest piece?
There are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary, and those that don't.
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 05:42 AM
#7
Frenzied Member
a/4?
Not sure about that one, I'm half-guessing.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 06:50 AM
#8
2a/4 [2 rods into 4 pieces]
=
a/2
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 06:56 AM
#9
Frenzied Member
But if the mean length of the shortest piece of one rod is a/2, then that can't be right.
2 rods of length 2a and 2b (where a=b but different letters for clarity)
mean shortest of a is a/2
mean shortest of b is b/2
mean shortest of a/2 and b/2 will always be less than a but usually less than a/2 as well.
I don't know the maths exactly but I'm still guessing a/4.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 07:26 AM
#10
damnit, I dodn't read the question properly!
I don't think I understand anything now...
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 08:33 AM
#11
transcendental analytic
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 01:07 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Keep on trying...
Some good (intuitive!) guesses but no-one's come up with the right answer yet.
Keep trying and I'll give a clue tomorrow...
There are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary, and those that don't.
-
Jul 17th, 2001, 04:42 PM
#13
transcendental analytic
a/3? i was assuming the rod was a, not 2a, so
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Jul 18th, 2001, 05:54 AM
#14
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Aha!...
Well done keda. a/3 is the answer. Tell us how you did it?
I may write a easy (easier!) to understand explanation later but for now.
1)Break the rods. Discard the longer length of each. Keep the shortest lengths.
2)The shortest lengths can be any length between 0 and a. So, draw a graph with the x axis being one rod and the y axis being the other.
3)Put a point (call it X) at some distance between 0 and a on both axes.
4)Find the area where the shortest length is smaller than X.
5)Remember to scale by a^2 because probabilities are out of 1.
6)This is the cumulative distribution function.
7)Differentiate with respect to x to find the probability density function.
8)Multiply by x and integrate between 0 and a.
Volia, a/3.
If everyone is sick of this puzzle then kewl, but say if you want another extension.
There are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary, and those that don't.
-
Jul 18th, 2001, 05:57 AM
#15
Frenzied Member
I always hated stats, and I still do.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Jul 18th, 2001, 11:53 AM
#16
transcendental analytic
I had the same exercise some years ago
And i remembered the result was 1/6 for a rod with length 1 anyways what I did was drawing a figure instead of integrating, a tetraeder (or tetrahedron, dunno how what it is, you know a pyramid with triangle as base) where the rightangled triangle base consists of the probability scale 0-1 and the length factor involved. As you divide off the height anyway, i've set it 1. The volume of a tetraeder is height* (length*width/2)/3 length*width being the base area, You get the same formula when you integrate, for sure. So that results in a/3 for length=2a
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|