|
-
Mar 11th, 2001, 04:43 PM
#1
Thread Starter
PowerPoster
Which is faster, DSN or DSN-less for connecting to a database? I have been using DSN, are there any specific advantages of using DSN-less? It seems no matter where I look, every one seems to favor one or the other.
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
-
Mar 11th, 2001, 05:48 PM
#2
Hyperactive Member
DSN is faster, but dsn-less is good if your db's are on a separate server and you don't know the full path or you can access it to install a dsn. thats what i've heard anyway.
-
Mar 12th, 2001, 09:25 AM
#3
New Member
I've always read that DSN-Less connections are faster, as a DSN connection requires a trip to the registry on each connection meaning when large numbers are being performed you suffer more of a performance hit?
-
Mar 12th, 2001, 12:07 PM
#4
Black Cat
DSN-less connections seem to me to be easier to maintain. I can upload the database without needing physical access to add/change the DSN.
Josh
Josh
Get these: Mozilla Opera OpenBSD
I have books for sale: "MCSD in a Nutshell" and "VB Distributed Exam Cram" - PM me for details. Will also trade for a decent ATX Pentium 2 MB/CPU/RAM combo.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|