Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Literary history question

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,008
    Here's one for you to tease out. Who can tell me the origins of the words:

    1.) QUIZ

    and

    2.) CABAL

    P.

    Not nearly so tired now...

    Haven't been around much so be gentle...

  2. #2
    Member Benjamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    48
    QUIZ
    Although we do not know the origin of the word quiz, just as we may not know the answers to all the questions on a quiz, we can say that its first recorded sense has to do with people, not tests. The term, first recorded in 1782, meant “an odd or eccentric person.” From the noun in this sense came a verb meaning “to make sport or fun of” and “to regard mockingly.” In English dialects and probably in American English the verb quiz acquired senses relating to interrogation and questioning. This presumably occurred because quiz was associated with question, inquisitive, or perhaps the English dialect verb quiset, “to question” (probably itself short for obsolete inquisite, “to investigate”). From this new area of meaning came the noun and verb senses all too familiar to students. The second recorded instance of the noun sense occurs in the writings of no less an educator than William James, who in a December 26, 1867, letter proffers the hope that “perhaps giving ‘quizzes’ in anatomy and physiology . . . may help along.”


    CABAL
    The history of cabal reveals how a word can be transferred from one sphere of activity to another while retaining only a tenuous connection with its past. Ultimately from Hebrew but transmitted to English probably by way of Medieval Latin and French, cabal is first recorded in English in 1616 in the sense “cabala.” Cabala was the name for the Hebrew oral tradition transmitted by Moses and also the name for a Jewish religious philosophy based on an esoteric interpretation of the Hebrew Scriptures. The notion “esoteric” is central to the development of this word in English, for cabal, probably following the sense development in French, came to mean “a tradition, special interpretation, or secret,” “a private intrigue” (first recorded in 1646-1647), and “a small body of intriguers” (first recorded in 1660). It is probably not coincidental that cabal is found with these latter meanings during the mid-17th century, that time of plots and counterplots by Royalists and Parliamentarians. The word gained a false etymology when it was noticed that the five most influential ministers of Charles II were named Clifford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley, and Lauderdale.
    -Dennis
    [email protected]
    Ever stop to think, and forget to start again?


    The end justifies the means
    http://www.cfm-resources.com/d/dewrenn
    http://www.phpsquare.com

  3. #3
    Guest
    Great reply, Dennis. I wasn't able to find anything on the
    roots of either, but I DID find some exceedingly
    interesting pages in the search. The most interesting
    (IMHO) is

    http://shideh.jetcafe.org/dave/usenet/freedom.html

    This guy says that yelling FIRE in a crowded theatre IS a
    perogative of Free Speech. It is YOUR problem what to do
    with it. Rather scary, in my opinion.

  4. #4

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,008
    V. Good.

    Quiz was the result of a bet - that a word could not be introduced into the language within a week. The gamblers posted up the word Quiz? in Dublin over the course of a weekend and by the end of that week, everyone knew the word.

    Course, that may all be bollocks, but there you go. That is why history is interesting.

    Cheers,

    P.
    Not nearly so tired now...

    Haven't been around much so be gentle...

  5. #5
    Guest
    Paul

    What was the time frame for the bet?

  6. #6

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,008
    A week, I think, but my memory on it is quite vague. I found it in an old encyclopaedia in a bookshop that I was browsing through. Nothing to back it up tho'. Interesting to see if we could find the derivation elsewhere.

    Cheers,

    P.
    Not nearly so tired now...

    Haven't been around much so be gentle...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width