Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: RedHat

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    RedHat

    I am trying to get RedHat linux setup on Virtual Server 2005, however Microsoft states that the versions of RedHat that are compatible are

    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 (update 6)

    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 (update 6)

    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.0

    • Red Hat Linux 7.3

    • Red Hat Linux 9.0

    Now I think the "enterprise" ones are the pay versions of redhat, but how about the 7.3 and 9.0 versions. In my searches around the web, it appears that even version 9 is rather old??

    I would try a newer build, or even fedora, but the Virtual Machines additions drivers are only stated to work with the given versions above. The additions drivers boost the guest OS performance in a virtual machine, and are really NEEDED to make using the guest OS a decent experience.

    So I found this archive link. Does this look like it would be what I need?
    ftp://archive.download.redhat.com/pu...at/linux/9/en/

    Also what is the newest version of RedHat that is available? I know fedora core is version 6, but fedora and redhat are technically 2 different things right?

  2. #2
    type Woss is new Grumpy; wossname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    #!/bin/bash
    Posts
    5,682

    Re: RedHat

    RH9 is pretty old now. And as far as I'm aware it doesn't support things like SATA discs so I wouldn't get used to it if I were you.

    Give FC6 a try anyway. If it doesn't work then thats MS's fault.

    RHEL and FC are different. RHEL is summarised here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux

    FC here
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_Core

    RHEL is basically corporate-based and commercial, FC is community-based open-source.
    Last edited by wossname; Apr 6th, 2007 at 10:52 AM.
    I don't live here any more.

  3. #3
    Frenzied Member TomGibbons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA Previous Location: UK
    Posts
    1,345

    Re: RedHat

    The current version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is 5.0, Red Hat 9 is about 4 years old, Red Hat and Fedora Project merged in 2003.

    Fedora Core 6 should work fine. It's technically different, but not by much. The biggest difference between FC and RHEL is that you pay Red Hat for support for the latter.

  4. #4

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: RedHat

    Well I havent found anything to say that anyone got the VMAdditions working on Fedora.

    SATA drives arent an issue because its all virtual anyway..

    I don't know enough about linux to be able to really thoroughly troubleshoot.

    I will try it though, because its all virtual machines, so I can easily blow out and retry things with the installations.

    Maybe I will do both RedHat 9 and Fedora 6 and see.

    I am pretty sure both will run fine as a virtual machine. I am more worried about the VM additions drivers working, as using the VM without them installed is rather sluggish.

  5. #5
    type Woss is new Grumpy; wossname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    #!/bin/bash
    Posts
    5,682

    Re: RedHat

    I only mention SATA because it highlights how out of date RH9 is.
    I don't live here any more.

  6. #6
    Frenzied Member litlewiki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli Distro:Ubuntu Fiesty
    Posts
    1,162

    Re: RedHat

    This link from a Google search is interesting.
    __________________
    ________________0îîî___
    ___îîî0________(___)____
    __(___)_________) _/_____
    ___\_ (_________(_/______
    ____\_)_________________

  7. #7

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: RedHat

    Quote Originally Posted by litlewiki
    This link from a Google search is interesting.
    My problem is less with which ones technically will install, and more with which ones will allow VMWare Additions to work.

    I don't know if you have played with virtual machines or not, but they are not fun to work in without having those extra drivers installed.

  8. #8
    type Woss is new Grumpy; wossname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    #!/bin/bash
    Posts
    5,682

    Re: RedHat

    At this rate you'll spend more time battling with the VM than Linux.
    I don't live here any more.

  9. #9

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: RedHat

    It is nice to use virtual machines because it takes the limit of off the amount of hardware I need to run.

    I might try VMWare server for linux installs instead of Virtual Server, and only use VS for Windows installs, and the few linux distros that are supported.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width