Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: OBITUARY

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member barrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    My own little world
    Posts
    274
    TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12
    OBITUARY: DEMOCRACY DEAD AT 224

    http://www.geocities.com/dearkandb/index.html

    United States Supreme Court: The ideal of American government succumbs
    after
    protracted gang-rape. The one-time virtue and muse of our national life
    was
    known for rising above partisanship.

    WASHINGTON--Democracy, an American ideal who championed causes ranging
    from
    full enfranchisement to civil rights, and was an influential presence in
    national political issues, died Saturday. She was 224.

    Officials writing for the majority at the United States Supreme Court,
    where
    Democracy died Saturday afternoon, declined to release a rational
    explanation for her demise. Constitutional scholars and historians say
    she
    apparently succumbed to injuries suffered during prolonged and violent
    torture and gang-rape.

    Democracy had undergone what these scholars describe as "willful torture,
    clearly intended to result in her demise." Just Friday, they had
    expressed
    hope that she would escape her captors and tormentors, the Republican
    Party,
    the Bush-Cheney campaign, and the conservative majority of the Unites
    States
    Supreme Court.

    From Washington to Los Angles, the well-liked, soft-spoken Democracy was
    remembered as the "ultimate expression of the peoples' will," who had
    risen
    above partisanship during a career in national politics dating from 1776.
    She was widely respected by progressive politicians for taking on
    thankless
    but important jobs, including equal rights for women and minorities; and
    had, until recently, enjoyed a friendly working relationship with
    conservatives on the other side of the aisle.

    A onetime elusive, almost impossible ideal, Democracy came into her own
    during the second half of the Twentieth Century. In recent years,
    however,
    she was increasingly unable to fend off ceaseless efforts by the radical
    right wing of the Republican Party to overturn her record of inclusion
    and
    empowerment. "Republican tactics before, during and after this election
    already have a rank odor" said constitutional scholar Anthony Lewis. "She
    [Democracy] held on, though, for as long as she was able."

    President Bill Clinton praised Democracy as a heroine who "worked
    tirelessly
    for the citizens of our nation," and "worked hard to make sure that the
    voices of the less fortunate could always be heard." Vice President and
    presidential candidate Al Gore recalled Democracy as "a grand pursuit,
    perhaps the most noble pursuit ever undertaken by humanity," in a somber
    statement late Saturday evening. "She wasn't one who used demagoguery or
    went out of her way to harm others," Gore added. "She was more interested
    in
    serving the people."

    A little over a month ago, Democracy was reported missing by voters in
    Florida's Palm Beach County. Soon, reports began flowing in from other
    counties in the state, indicating that she was thought to be missing
    there
    as well. Concerned citizens from other areas of the state, indeed from
    all
    over the country, joined in a desperate search for the missing icon.
    Concern soon turned to dread as reports began trickling in that Democracy
    was being held hostage by the Republican Party, the Bush-Cheney campaign,
    and the conservative majority of the US Supreme Court. As the reports
    grew
    more ominous, it became apparent that rape was the motive.

    With ostrich-like denial, the national press refused to entertain the
    possibility that the venerated American muse might be in danger. Despite
    urgent reports and voluminous evidence, which continued to mount for
    several
    weeks, the media treated her abduction and torture with indifference and
    good humor. Progressive political leaders and involved citizens,
    including
    presidential candidate Gore, continued to appeal to the Fifth Estate for
    its
    assistance in investigating and documenting the crime in progress, to no
    avail. These same political leaders and citizens petitioned the courts
    to
    intervene on Democracy's behalf, but were rebuffed.

    Just this Friday, hopes were again raised when it appeared that Democracy
    might escape her tormentors alive. Progressives celebrated in the
    streets
    of America, honking their horns and hugging each other in unabashed joy.
    Their relief was short-lived, however, as word came Saturday indicating
    that
    Democracy had, indeed, died at the United States Supreme Court.

    "There isn't a single time when the people called upon her that she
    wasn't
    there," said Florida Representative Lois Frankel (D), wiping away tears,
    "I
    am just so sorry that we couldn't be there to save her."

    In a display of excruciatingly bad taste, powerful members of the
    Republican
    Party appeared on a series of national media programs, to celebrate
    Democracy's death, and to congratulate those responsible for her rape and
    murder. When questioned about the circumstances surrounding her death, a
    Bush aide in Tallahassee commented, laughing, "It's just a family
    affair."

    Memorial services for the deceased will be held at undisclosed locations,
    nationwide, for the next four years.

    "The shock [of Democracy's death] will linger for a while," said Rev.
    Cecil
    Murray of First AME Church. "But a great person always stands taller than
    her tombstone."

  2. #2
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,008
    Benign Dictatorship is a better form of government anyway...

    Ooooh. Controversial!

    No chance that you are a Democrat (capital D)?

    Bet the Florida Supreme Court reply in kind. Does the US Supreme Court have the power to overrule the Florida court?

    Surely the running of the election is a State matter and not a Federal one? Not too sure how your system works with reference to the Judicial arm.

    In the UK, you don't tend to get party splits in panels of judges - that is because none of them would ever vote Labour!

    Cheers,

    P.
    Not nearly so tired now...

    Haven't been around much so be gentle...

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member barrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    My own little world
    Posts
    274
    Yes indeed. I am a registered democrat. I don't agree with the republican platform at all. It is going to be an interesting four years with Bush as president. I'm not looking forward to it. The scariest part is the legacy Bush will leave behind. They expect two supreme court justices to leave during his term which means that Bush will be able to appoint two new justices (of course they will be republican). What this means is that Roe v. Wade (the legalization of abortion) will be overturned, the anti-gun legislation will be overturned...many other scary things to come.

    As for Benign Dictatorship being better form of government.....this is the form of government we use in our family...works great when you have teenagers!



    [Edited by barrk on 12-13-2000 at 12:02 PM]

  4. #4
    Guest
    The Supreme Court is the final word on all Constitutional
    questions. The big argument (usually) is WHICH part of the
    constitution is being violated. The remedy for the
    violation is usually NOT prescribed by the Supreme Court.

    In this case, the court has held that NOT counting all the
    "undercount" votes is more fair than using a non-described
    standard that can vary. In other words, my vote for Gore
    might not count in a district where "dimpled" chads are not
    allowed, while your vote for Gore would count. This is
    deemed unfair to me, therefore NO votes will count.






  5. #5
    Guest
    Read this thread barrk. Has to do with the Obituary .

  6. #6

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member barrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    My own little world
    Posts
    274

    Smile

    Cute Matthew...it's Katie not barrk please.

  7. #7
    Guest
    Sorry barrk.

    ...I mean, Katie .

    Got to get into the habit of calling you Katie .

  8. #8
    Guest

    Unhappy Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

    ....the day the music died.

    Ozzie for President with Jimmy Page as running mate

    Currently under discussion in Oz.

    Do we despatch Australian Peacekeepers to the USA, to maintain law and order till democracy can be fully re-instated to this strife torn land.

  9. #9
    Lively Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Posts
    123
    If this situation arose in an African or Central American banana republic (no offence intended towards bananas!) then the United Nations collectively and national governments individually would refuse to recognise the government, saying that the election was rigged.

    Whats the difference in this case?

    This is not intended to be anti-Bush. I had the same opinion as soon as this fiasco started.

  10. #10
    Guest
    Not at all, Michael. The UN and etc, are (in the case of
    small volitile republics) more concerned with form than
    with substance. All countries that have votes have
    evidence of fraud, lying, vote-buying, etc.

    In this case, there was a matter of definition: What
    constitutes evidence of voter intent. These ballots went
    through the counting machines twice, and were twice kicked
    out because the machine could read no punched hole.

    The Dems contention was that the machine couldn't read the
    vote due to MACHINE failure (ie: the chad didn't clear
    out). The Reps contention was that the machine was the
    only truly dis-interested party, and that people could not
    be trusted to be fair (you always accuse others of what you
    would do).

    The courts decided (right, wrong, or otherwise) that
    without a clearly defined manner of determining voter
    intent, the Reps contention was closer to the perfect
    truth, AND was the only clearly applicable standard for the
    entire country.


    If the same senario were to play out in Rwanda, with the
    same lack of interest in a coup, the UN and the rest of the
    world would be cheering in the streets.

  11. #11
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Posts
    1,089
    Could I just mention that personally, no matter how much fun I have taking the piss that I think this election was an example of democracy working perfectly.

    What people don't seem to realise about democracy is that it doesn't work because people choose which of the 2 candidates is best (imagine if you had to vote between Saddam and Hitler, Even if the elections worked perfectly people still wouldn't get the president they wanted.) Democracy works because the contesting parties shift their political positions to where the vote lies. The reason the election was such a shambles was that there was essentially nthing to choose between the 2 parties, apart from a few trivial differences so people didn't know which one to vote for If public opinion was furthur to the right Bush would have won because he's the slightly more right wing, further to the left Gore would have got it. But because public opinion and the political stance of the parties are so close the vote was split and nobody could decide who won.
    If it wasn't for this sentence I wouldn't have a signature at all.

  12. #12
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    I'd vote Hitler every time because he's dead.

    I just don't see why they spent so long over it. Even with a close result, in Britain we have a new government within about 2 days .

    Unfortunately most of our choices are complete crap.
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width