|
-
Sep 26th, 2004, 03:18 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Abel's formula, confusion!
Hello everyone,
The differiental equation i solved was:
dW/dx = -p(x)W.
I solved a diffferential equation above and it equaled,
W(x) = ce^(-Intgral[ p(x) dx ]), where c is a constant.
And i guess its a famous formual and its name is Abel's formula.
But now they want me to explain,
Why does Abel's formula imply that the Wronskian W(y1,y2) is either zero everywhere or nonzero everywhere?
Well I know the following:
Suppose that y1 and y2 are two solutions of the homoegenous second order linear equation,
y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = 0; //equation 1
on an open interaval I on which p and q are continuus.
(a) If y1 and y2 are linearly dependent, then W(y1,y2) = 0 on I.
(b) If y1 and y2 are linearly independent, then W9y1,y2) != 0 at each point on I.
Thus, given two solutions of Eq. 1, there are just two possiblities: the Wronksian W is identically zero if the solutions are linearly dependent; The wronskian is never zero if the solutions are linearly independent.
But this doens't explain why Abel's fomrula implys that the Wronkian W(y1,y2) is either zero everywhere or nonzero everywhere?
Thanks for listening,
C¤ry Sanchez
Computer Science/Engineering
@ Penn State
IBM.zSeries Intern
Mandriva 2007
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|