|
-
May 7th, 2003, 11:26 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
It wasn't for oil, was It ??
-
May 7th, 2003, 02:14 PM
#2
Fanatic Member
Gee, I thought it was so we could swipe Uday's gold-plated gun collection. Who wants a bunch of icky dumb black goo when you can get c00l sTupH like a gold AK-47?
-
May 7th, 2003, 02:20 PM
#3
Addicted Member
Place Your VBForums Ad Here
-
May 8th, 2003, 03:15 AM
#4
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
Did you read the document ?
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
May 8th, 2003, 07:28 AM
#5
New Member
Originally posted by plenderj
Did you read the document ?
Since when do you believe anything coming out of the US government? 
X
-
May 8th, 2003, 08:11 AM
#6
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
I believe there are shreds of truth buried under mountains of spin
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
May 8th, 2003, 08:18 AM
#7
Addicted Member
As long as it coincides with your agenda.
Place Your VBForums Ad Here
-
May 8th, 2003, 09:48 AM
#8
Frenzied Member
I don't see what the big deal is????
Someone is going to have to run the iraqi oil industry until the iraqi government gets organized and is able to do it themselves, and yes, with all the arguing about what kind of government the iraqis want (democratic, islamic state, etc...) it could take a while before they get a government in place. What are they supposed to do in the meantime? just stop pumping oil? no, not when 100's of countries economies depend on them for a portion of their oil.
Being educated does not make you intelligent.
Need a weekend getaway??? Come Visit
-
May 8th, 2003, 10:50 AM
#9
New Member
I don’t think there is anything proven yet either. This is all preliminary information and subject to change. I haven’t actually seen excerpts from the original contract being quoted, only vague language stating that this company "can include "operation" and "distribution" of Iraqi oil."
Can include? And why is operation and distribution in quotes? What exactly does that mean? This seems to be all a political move and nothing more.
I can't really comment further without seeing the actual contract and what it really entails. Also I just want to add that I am glad that it’s an American company and not a French or Russian one 
X
-
May 12th, 2003, 12:34 PM
#10
Well ...
I heard on TV, I think it was BBC but not sure, that Powell has claimed the Iraqi oil production and sale should be under complete US control for one year.
.
-
May 13th, 2003, 07:02 AM
#11
Addicted Member
Place Your VBForums Ad Here
-
May 13th, 2003, 11:45 AM
#12
Fanatic Member
I thought the whole purpose of the war was to give HB something to talk about.
BOMB MECCA......please.
-
May 14th, 2003, 09:24 PM
#13
Well ...
Originally posted by venerable bede
I thought the whole purpose of the war was to give HB something to talk about.
BOMB MECCA......please.
Hmm... If that was the sole purpose of war, that just shows how irresponsible your governments have been Although I must give it to them that they have given not just me, but the whole world something to talk about. Any comments on the resignation of Clare Short from the Blair government? Or the return of Garner from Iraq to the US and Bremmer taking his place? Seems to me the US never had any plans for the reconstruction and now it's trying to find some justification why it destroyed Iraq. Why it's being reported in newspapers that forget the WMDs, the US has not even found enough conventional weapons to fight a war in Iraq...
.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|