|
-
May 23rd, 2012, 03:33 PM
#11
Re: Big new technological advancements ?
 Originally Posted by SJWhiteley
Making (forcing) us to flush with gray water doesn't bring those without clean drinking water any closer to that reality.
In addition, is flushing with clean, sanitary, water a problem? Is it a health risk? If it doesn't make one difference or another, why do it? Is there truly 'no burden' in actually converting to a dual water system? If so, why are we not doing it now? (I'm certain if we followed this argument it would eventually end in the Godwin-like Big Oil barrier).
Where did I say this should be done because flushing with clean water is unsanitary or a health risk? You're arguing with statements that I've never made.
I'm simply saying is that it's a waste of a pretty valuable resource, and that steps should be made to conserve it. I'm not advocating for a dual water system, that might in fact be the most expensive solution especially if you were to retrofit it to existing buildings.
EDIT: And you already have laws limiting the amount of water per flush to 1.6 gallons, so how would a similar (and reasonable) mandate be different? But I guess you flush twice just to spite the government.
Last edited by baja_yu; May 23rd, 2012 at 03:45 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|