-
Jan 13th, 2003, 06:37 AM
#1
Sounds too good to be true
All the buzzt
CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Jan 13th, 2003, 12:19 PM
#2
<?="Moderator"?>
ive been beta testing it for a while(since i cant afford to buy it )
and i think it well kool
PS. dont take me too serious i dont know much about C++ optimizers and stuff like that
-
Jan 14th, 2003, 09:41 AM
#3
Monday Morning Lunatic
It's about time, but kudos to MS for getting it going
Although, most of the issues with buffer overruns are the fault of using C-like code rather than C++...
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Jan 15th, 2003, 12:01 PM
#4
Guru
Looks like a bunch of crap to me.
ISO/ANSI C++ Standards Compliance
For some reason, I highly doubt that this will come complete and not very buggy.
Many of Microsoft's core products have been and are built with C++, and the language has been central to Microsoft. Regrettably, Standard C++ has not been.
***? Is he saying what I think he's saying?
New features include Partial Template Specialization, Partial Ordering, Member Template Definitions, and much more.
Good job. Too bad Microsoft has already driven everyone away from templates.
On the other hand, look here: http://www.comeaucomputing.com
Microsoft has added the /GS compiler option.
Hi? It's available in VC++ 7, which has been out for like a year now.
-
Jan 15th, 2003, 02:22 PM
#5
transcendental analytic
Partial Template Specialization
even though I came up with a workaround since VC6
***? Is he saying what I think he's saying?
not sure what you thought, but it seemed like Microsoft didn't care much about standard compliance.
The only thing I actually care about now is the optimations, if VC++.NET2k3's compiler is going to optimise better than VC7, then its certainly going to be useful.
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Jan 16th, 2003, 07:07 AM
#6
Guru
Oh, I misread it, and thought he meant it is regrettable that Standard C++ has not been under Microsoft control, which is clearly not regrettable and quite relieving
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|