Search:
Type: Posts; User: LogicalVue
Search:
Search took 0.02 seconds.
-
Correct, the free version will be able to run your apps directly from the IDE (including using the remote debugger). You only need to purchase it when you are ready to create stand-alone apps.
...
-
It could be. For some the price goes up, for some the price goes down.
The new pricing redistributes the cost more fairly, we think. And the new free version will allow many more people to use...
-
As Joacim also mentioned, the remote debugger greatly mitigates this problem.
And with the Enterprise Edition, you are allowed to run the IDE on any platforms you want. With the other editions you...
-
Real Studio has two main strengths. First, it is incredibly easy to use. Second, it is cross-platform.
VB6 was also incredibly easy to use. But its language was not fully object-oriented and it...
-
Right. The WebSDK is really only for hooking up controls (although you can use controls that also rely on their own frameworks).
-
Us evangelists can smell threads like this :-)
Sorry about that. Your sig had links so I thought they were permitted. I'll remove the conference link.
Yes, you can use controls that rely...
-
Real Studio is a great alternative to Visual Basic. As far as capabilities go, it fits between VB6 and VB.NET. The language itself is fully object-oriented and closer to VB.NET than it is to VB6. But...
-
Depending on your needs, you might also want to take a look at Real Studio. Its language is similar in syntax to VB6, but is fully object-oriented like VB.NET.
-- Paul (Real Software Developer...
-
REALBasic's AutoComplete works a little different than VB. When you see the "..." that shows up after you start typing something you can just press the Tab key to get a pop-up list of the available...
-
I see an error at App.CancelClose that says SaveFile does not exist. Which it doesn't. Although it does exist on TextWindow, the App class has no knowledge of that.
It doesn't look to me like...
-
Your frustration with REALbasic is evident, but that is no reason to be so cranky :)
Anyway, contrary to your belief, REALbasic does not use an interpreter. It does actually compile to native...
-
I hear Delphi is pretty good. I've been meaning to try out one of the Turbo Explorer editions, but I haven't gotten around to it (it seemed like it had a bunch of prereqs I needed to install first...
-
Well it depends on what you're doing, of course. If you're using VB.NET to create ASP.NET applications, then REALbasic is not an option. If you're creating services or anything COM related then...
-
I know:
REALbasic, VB6, VB.NET, C#, PowerBuilder PowerScript, Advanced Revelation R/Basic, Pascal, C, SQL, PL/SQL and Java.
But I greatly prefer basic-like languages because I find them the...
-
I'm not familiar with PowerBASIC, but REALbasic does generate native code for each platform that it builds for (Windows, OS X and Linux). Its native code is not known for being tremendously fast,...
-
I'm curious how many people on this forum have looked at REALbasic as an alternative to VB6 or VB.NET.
Your thoughts?
---
Paul Lefebvre
REALbasic Community Evangelist
-
I definitely cannot agree with this statement. REALbasic may not be as popular as VB (what is?), but it's a perfectly decent programming system. I also would not say it's cumbersome. The IDE...
-
I've tried a bunch over the years (Mandriva, RedHat, SuSe, PCLinux, Linspire) and I like Ubuntu the best.
-- Paul
-
That's weird. I've had no trouble getting Vista to run in Virtual PC 2007. I'm sure you've check this, but did you make sure that the network card settings in the virtual machine properties are...
-
Have you considered REALbasic? For someone just starting out, it could be a good combination between the ease-of-use of VB5/6 and the object-oriented goodness of VB.NET 2005.
-- Paul
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|